Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 17 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL) Apr 27 Outfront Conference (NYC) May 12 OMMA Mobile (NYC) May 13 Digital Out-of-Home Awards (NYC) Jun 15 OMMA Video Jun 16 OMMA Publish (NYC) Jun 17 OMMA Social (NYC)
Recently Concluded Events
Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 25 OMMA Performance (SF) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 Digital Out-of-Home Awards
2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Woe The Digital Sale: Why No Cherry-Picking?
by Amy Auerbach and Jason Krebs, Friday, November 20, 2009, 1:00 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES
TAGS:  Media Buying, Online Publishing

MOST READ

Question from the mailbag: Why can't I just cherry-pick placements that I need for my media plan?  I've been working with a direct response client for a while now, and I know what works.  When I RFP sites, I can't just get what I want.  I have to buy other placements that don't perform in order to get what does.  Lucky for them, the ROI is still there but why is this the case?

Amy says: I've worked on many direct-response campaigns over the years and have encountered the same frustration.  It would seem to be much easier to just focus on buying a few placements that drive your response rather than a comprehensive plan with a site.  But there may be some hidden factors that could sabotage your performance if you left those other placements out. 

Usually the most targeted placements drive the best ROI.  Based on the navigation of the site, it may be that users are exposed to your ads on their way to the targeted placements.  So if you lose those impressions outside the most targeted placement, that last impression may not be as effective to drive that conversion. Users often travel through sites like going down a funnel -- from general content to more targeted content -- so you want to have them exposed to your ads the entire time.

Atlas Institute has done some research that supports this kind of attribution for a conversion: that it's not just the last impression that counts. The research focuses on different sites affecting conversion, but I think it can apply to placements too, especially with larger sites.

So, before you go cherry-picking, look more closely about what is going on with your campaign.  You don't want to mess up a good thing.  But that's just the agency perspective.  I'm sure there are more practical business reasons why sites don't sell just placements.  Jason, give us the real story!

Jason says: Bummed you can't cherry-pick? Pity. Life may be just a bowl of cherries, but advertising is much more nuanced than that. In addition to the fact that it may not be a good customer acquisition strategy, as Amy points out, allowing cherry-picking in the sales world is generally not a responsible form of asset management.

When a media property knows that a certain product or placement is a unique and highly valued asset, the thought is this: If someone wants it so badly, why not make him or her buy other things, of decidedly lesser value, in order to get it? Seems like a fairly democratic principle of supply and demand. (It is not unlike the hot girl you ask out who makes you bring along your roommate for her girlfriend with the great personality.) By the way, this is not just an Internet thing. You cannot just call up a salesperson at ABC and buy one thirty-second spot during an episode of "Grey's Anatomy."  Similarly, try asking Vogue if it would be okay for you to buy just one ad all year -- and could it please be on the back cover of the September issue? You may want to duck as the Jimmy Choo comes flying at you.

Not allowing someone to singularly pick off your best (or most wanted) asset is simply good media management. Life IS a bowl of cherries. You just have to deal with a few pits along the way (and angry roommates).

19 people recommend this article. 

2 comments on "Woe The Digital Sale: Why No Cherry-Picking?"

  1. Steven Fisher from HomeRemodelingPortal.com
    commented on: November 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM
    I am thoroughly enjoying this thread simply because everyone is right. From a sales point, it is basic economics, the law of supply and demand. You hold out your prime positions for your top advertisers and/or force them to buy the entire package. From a media stand point, you have to hold out for the best deal and exactly what you want.

    It is really a giant game of chicken and a question of who is going to blink first. If I have a really successful website and feel I can walk away if the deal isn't in my best interest than I will. On the other hand, if my website is flagging or I have a quota to meet, I will be more inclined to deal.

    As a buyer, it is the same conundrum. If there are lots of websites for me to choose from I have much more leverage. If I really feel I need this particular website then I will pay what I have to.

    Here is what it really comes down to: How do you build a win/win scenario out of an adversarial relationship?

  2. Thomas Greve from Summit Business Media
    commented on: November 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM
    Jason nails it with his response. Publishers fight with sales teams and clients over "value-added benefit" or "bonus pages" for a 3x ad schedule in our best issues. Premium placement should be reserved for the clients spending the most money. Try buying a 10 ticket package for the Yankees and ask for the Sox, the Mets and the playoffs. AND... you want to pay bleacher pricing for two rows behind the dugout. I don't think so. Why such a hard time for Publishers holding rate card integrity and protecting page yields? We respect your need to negotiate but be realistic. We have budgets to meet too.

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

AMY AUERBACH AND JASON KREBS
  • Amy Auerbach was formerly senior vice president, director, digital at Initiative Media in New York City. She has also run digital media planning & buying teams at Euro, Media Contacts and PHD. Jason Krebs is co-founder of ShortTail Media and has run digital sales and marketing teams at Conde Nast and The New York Times.


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES

RECENT VIDEOS
Recent Online Publishing Insider Articles
Why Ask Why When You Can Plan How   
When you learn your site didn't make a buy and then report this news to your...
The Fox Guarding the Hen House   
My latest MediaPost column attracted the ire of none other than Randall Rothenberg, President and CEO...
Pay Walls Are Smart Rationing: The Goldilocks Principle   
Rationing has been made a dirty word in the healthcare debate. But appropriate and successful rationing...
Publishers Are Committing Fraud    
It has come time for someone to finally call B.S. There have been countless articles and...
Woe The Digital Sale: Reflections On Gift-Giving   
From the mailbox: Our agency mail room was a bit more busy this year than last...
Subject: The Portals Will Perish (Eventually)    
So many predictions find their way into the public airwaves at this time. It's obviously a...
Woe The Digital Sale: End-Of-Year Deals?   
An agency person says, "Here we go again. Every November I get presented lots of 'great...
What Should Hearst Buy?   
What should a billion dollars buy? The New York media twittering classes are speculating on where...
CPM Pricing is Doomed   
Since it is the time of year that prognosticators attempt to predict the future, let me...
Taking Time Seems Hard To Take   
As a medium, we started this decade in such an aggressive rush to prove online "worked,"...
>> Online Publishing Insider Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2010 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com