Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Was It Google Or Was It Print?
by Dave Morgan, Thursday, June 8, 2006, 12:15 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

Some interesting headlines came out of Google's investor conference call last week. From Business Week: "Google Fumbles Offline." From the San Francisco Chronicle: "Google Can't Sell All the Ads that are Fit to Print."

What they are referring to is Google's well-reported experiment to sell print advertising through the same self-service auction format that has been proven so successful with its search and contextual advertising. According to media reports, the initiative involved more than twenty high-profile publications, including the Chicago Sun-Times, Martha Stewart Living, Hachette's Car and Driver, and PC Magazine. Google bought remnant space in these publications and attempted to resell the space in an open auction on its ad-buying interface.

Apparently, it didn't work very well. In fact, during the conference call, it was singled out as Google's "single most disappointing business development over the past six months."

What happened? While there have been a lot of facts reported about it publicly, it appears that: there wasn't much bidding; the prices came in well below even a discounted rate card; and, even at heavily discounted rates, the advertisers didn't get the results that they expected. To be fair, this was Google's first attempt at something like this. The company has acknowledged that they have to do a lot of work to find successful formats, and probably no one should have expected too much.

But, it was Google--and expectations were high--so it's appropriate to ask some questions. Why didn't it work? What went wrong? Was it Google, or was it print?

I suspect that many in the industry will attribute the setback not to Google, or to its approach to auction-based, self-service advertising, but to a fundamental problem with print media and print advertising. Print media is easy to beat up on these days. There are lots of problems, not the least of which are shrinking audiences, burgeoning cost structures, and antiquated approaches to ad packaging, sales, and measurement. Maybe print just wasn't able to stand the scrutiny and accountability of auction-based pricing and lead-based tracking and accountability.

I disagree. I suspect that the failure had much more to do with Google's inappropriate approach to print advertising than it did to print advertising's inability to deliver results for its clients.

Why? Google has not created the world's greatest all-purpose advertising machine. Rather, it has created the world's greatest yellow pages directory. There is a big difference.

Search is intent-based, just like yellow pages. It is used to generate leads. It focuses on creating immediate and measurable effects. Clicks are like phone calls.

National print display advertising is media-based or audience-based. It is about creating or influencing brand and product perceptions. It focuses on creating longer-term--and harder to measure--effects. Clicks are not like creating warm, fuzzy feelings about driving a Jeep up a mountain.

There are lots of other differences.

The advertisers are different. Search is driven by small and medium-sized businesses. National print display advertising is driven by large advertisers.

The creative is different. Search uses clickable text ads. National print display ads are highly graphical and can't be clicked.

The sales process is different. Search ads are largely bought on the basis of simple, information-based selling. Its lead-based nature means that its value is more obvious and self-evident. "Selling" search is providing information and lead reports. National print display brand advertising must be sold the old-fashioned way that requires longer sales cycles, lots of face time, and lots of consultation. Its longer-term, brand-based nature means that its value is complex, more qualitative, and less intuitive.

In theory, it would be great if Google could bring the efficiency of its self-serve methodology to the offline world. However, everyone should understand that just because it works in online search, doesn't mean that it will work everywhere. It can't. Some forms of advertising are just too different. If I were Google, and I wanted to build a marketplace for print advertising, I would spend much more time looking at print yellow pages, print classified books, and free-standing inserts in newspapers. These formats operate much more like search.

9 comments on "Was It Google Or Was It Print?"

  1. Chris Kelly from Petry Media
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 2:57 PM
    Dave Morgan is DEAD ON! One shoe, even the great golden Google slipper, does not fit all. When last I checked print is far from dead, too.

  2. nettie hartsock from internet business forum
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 2:00 PM
    Hi Dave,

    Great column! I just actually posted a column on my PR blog, about Google's foray at Capitol Hill this week which echoes your "why didn't it work" as far as their visit there.

    Nettie Hartsock http://www.allbusiness.com/blog/ProfessionalPR/2975292/005888.html

  3. Melody Dare from Dare Associates 2
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 1:53 PM
    I have to agree with Dave Morgan on his assessment of Google's print auction attempt. The difference between providing basic information that is available per click and building brands that influence human perception is as different as night and day. It's about time someone said it!

    Melody Dare Dare Associates

  4. Merrell Ligons from The San Antonio Express-News
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 1:41 PM
    Dave that was very well written.

  5. Arthur Barbato from eyesclick.com
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 1:09 PM
    After reading Dave Morgan's article it's as clear as bottled water that Tacoda has a handle on the core baseline differences of print and online.

    Without the contacts at the brands and their agencies nothing much gets done.

    The old-school approach of making-the-calls and gaining face-time is, as Dave Morgan describes, still the key to success of advertising/marketing. Advertising/marketing are still partners much the sames as leeanddan.com and Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. One without the other is like a tree falling without a witness. -arthur@addata.net

  6. Edward Omeara from MediaHound Development, Inc
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 1:06 PM
    Completely Agree. I remember when Google first came out, and it was that exact metaphor - yellow pages - that we all used. However, the spin-meisters, blogaholics, and well worn pr flaks in search of higher meaning that rebranded it as Advertising...

  7. Joshua Chasin from Warp Speed Marketing, Inc.
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 1:04 PM
    Precisely.

  8. Gary Strauss from Imaginova
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 12:42 PM
    Nice story Dave. ROI and DR is not a major factor in planning a magazine media buy. If I am working selling space for SI, Vogue or a myriad of the other fantastic magazines out there, what Google could possibly offer a publisher is revenue to augment their sales teams. Their sales teams call on the major accounts-Google could help but consolidating new, mostly direct advertisers but in no way will Google, despite their best efforts, do anything but add a little revenue to existing magazines. Not unless of course they become a publisher.

  9. Joe Straughan from Networld Alliance
    commented on: June 08, 2006 at 12:38 PM
    In fairness to Google, a mid-year test is pretty much doomed for failure in today's economy. While some advertisers may use fiscal-year budgeting, most run from January through December. Discretionary funds seem to be pretty much a thing of the past. Who has budget for unexpected bargains?

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

DAVE MORGAN
  • Dave Morgan is the CEO of Simulmedia. Previously, he founded and ran both TACODA and Real Media.


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES

Recent Online Spin Articles
The Loss Of Apprenticeships Is A Tragedy    
I had breakfast earlier this week with Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack, a friend who is...
Time To Eliminate Vacation Policies?   
There was quite a stir a few months ago when an internal presentation about how Netflix...
A Simple Prediction For 2010    
I've decided that making predictions in a climate which is so tenuous and conservative could be...
Understanding Social Media 2.0: The Widget Is Dead    
The Internet was around for many years before it got its "2.0" designation. Social media has...
How News Spreads Today: The Media-tization Of The Big Black Phone    
When I was a kid, a phone ringing in the middle of the night meant only...
Caskets? Great Deals At Costco   
'm not easy to market to. I'm loyal to few brands. I shun most advertising. I'm...
End The Debate: Go Ahead, Charge For Your Online Content    
"Web communism" and "ubiquity is the new exclusivity" were among the lines being traded in a...
Coupon Clippers Proven To Drive Incremental Sales   
Digital couponing has risen dramatically in the last 12 months because consumers are more concerned with...
The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace   
There is a race going on that a lot of people don't fully understand -- but...
Brand Velocity And Your Business Model   
We often affirm the necessity of thoughtful consumer brand marketing that conveys and sustains the brand....
>> Online Spin Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com