Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 17 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL) Apr 27 Outfront Conference (NYC) May 12 OMMA Mobile (NYC) May 13 Digital Out-of-Home Awards (NYC) Jun 15 OMMA Video Jun 16 OMMA Publish (NYC) Jun 17 OMMA Social (NYC)
Recently Concluded Events
Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 25 OMMA Performance (SF) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 Digital Out-of-Home Awards
2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Fox's O.J. Simpson Dilemma: An $8M Question
by Wayne Friedman, Monday, November 20, 2006, 12:45 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

Bill O'Reilly makes a strong point in the controversy around O.J: He won't buy the book, watch the show, or "if any company sponsors the TV program, I will not buy anything that company sells--ever."

And, that of course, is the $64 million question. Actually it's an $8 million question, at best. That would be what Fox grosses in advertising sales over the course of two nights at the end of this month should it sell all 40 thirty-second commercials in the two-hour broadcast at some $200,000 a spot.

Can Fox sell any advertising? Analysts speculate that movie companies might take a whack at it, and some Internet companies, who seemingly don't care about content. The Internet domain Web site, GoDaddy.com, could be one of those, say media executives.

Other media analysts say this has nothing to do with whether Fox can sell advertising or not. Pure and simple, it's about publicity for Fox. Eight million dollars is a drop in the bucket when your network is suffering from some poor fall programming choices, when the Major League Baseball playoffs aren't making money and aren't contributing to any kind of promotional platform for your new TV shows. (Only "American Idol" can provide that.)

There are bigger issues. Perhaps it's telling that not even Fox News would dirty up its hands with O.J. Simpson and his new book, If I Did It. One wonders if Fox indeed tried to get its experienced journalists to attempt an interview with Simpson. Seemingly journalists at Fox News would have rejected this out of hand--as would virtually any reputable reporter.

But one former reporter has taken it on--Judith Regan. Her background is working at that esteemed publication, the National Enquirer. She's also the publisher of the book.

Regan, who now runs ReganBooks, an imprint of HarperCollins owned by News Corp., believes she gets a confession from O.J. in the interview. She says that her own experience as a battered woman pushed her into publishing the book, and hopes that the injured parties will grab some of the money from the proceeds of the book.

So Regan's purpose is to help the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman? If that is the case, what is her allegiance to Simpson, her client?

Not surprisingly, nine Fox affiliates have figured all this out. So they have told Fox they won't be airing the show. "Our company feels very strongly that there is no beneficial interest to the airing of this program except to O.J. Simpson, and we have no desire to benefit O.J. Simpson," Pappas Telecasting Co.'s Mike Angellos told the Washington Post.

"Interest" is the key word here. TV analysts should take careful note of the minute-by-minute ratings. The interview may score big ratings in the first minute--but by minute 23, viewers might be bored and lose interest.

That won't be good news for Fox. With the buzz dying down, the network will have to go into a quiet period again, waiting until late January when "Idol" comes around to save the day.

1 person recommends this article. 

11 comments on "Fox's O.J. Simpson Dilemma: An $8M Question"

  1. James W. Johnston from Johnston & Company
    commented on: November 23, 2006 at 2:47 PM
    Wayne--

    With all due respect, I must ask "How pathetic we have become?"

    An Eight Million Dollar Question. If that is all the O.J. Simpson saga means to you, I must suggest that you are missing the much larger and more important point.

    The real question is, "What are your values, and how will govern your actions?" You will not be engaged in your career forever. None of us will. This is just a way to earn our daily bread--the sweat of the brow, if you will. Humans are possessed of an immutable, eternal spirit that exists far past the grave. This is a simple, easy fact. Mortality is one phase in existence and a critical one. It behooves us to ask ourselves, "How will we account for our behavior, our values and that which we held dearest while living in this mortal proving ground?"

    I submit you that there is far more at stake here than eight million dollars; if that is all one sees, I can honestly say they are (a) missing the point entirely; and (b) in for a nasty shock.

    Direction and momentum is the key. Principal, and living by the right ones, is essential. Profiting on murder is wrong. End of story.

    Jaywhiz

  2. Jennifer Chelwick from Donnelley
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 4:51 PM
    I agree that this T.V. Show and Book are completely disgusting and in poor taste. I do however think that the book will be the only way that the Brown and Goldman families will ever see a dime. So for their sake I hope everyone buys the book and then immediately dumps it into their recycling bin!

  3. Yolanda Christiansen from Lincoln Financial Group
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 4:09 PM
    Regarding Regan's rebuttal that she is trying to seek revenge for the Brown's and Goldman's, financially, I don't think these two families are going to see $1 of the money involved both in fees to O.J. and in retail sales of this book. I agree with those networks that there is no benefit neither to the audiences of this network, nor to the families themselves. Who actually benefits?????

  4. Jim O'Neal from United Stations Radio Network
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 3:38 PM
    This just in...the show has been cancelled

  5. Jim O'Neal from United Stations Radio Network
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 2:22 PM
    The very thought of watching this/reading about it...and worse, seeing it sponsored...makes me sick to my stomach. Shame on Fox, Judith Regan and any one else behind this sick and twisted "event." OJ will rot in hell one day... he may well have company.

  6. Ken Greenberg from Edge Communications, Inc.
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 2:08 PM
    And O'Reilly is, we can now assume, tendering his resignation to Fox -- is that right?

  7. James Boldebook from CBC
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 1:55 PM
    let's wait til Idol saves the day. No one should air..or watch something that is just putting cash in the hands of a murderer who got away with it. If I was convinced every dime was going to the kids and the Goldman family I may feel different. I just can't understand why anyone close to OJ doesnt just shun him. Turn their back on him when he walks in the room. He deserves no less. Nor does anyone conspiring to aid and abet and enrich him.

  8. Theresa VanGutman from LivingWell
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 1:52 PM
    Fox is throwing away all hope of respectability for the next few years. This is sick and dehumanizing. Shame on those who advertise or watch a murderer selling his story for any kind of fame.

  9. Ron Galardi from mBlox
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 1:41 PM
    Shame on Fox! OJ does not deserve the attention - he deserves jail!

  10. Nancy Pierce from Pierce Media, Inc.
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 1:35 PM
    Why are we still allowing O.J. Simpson free publicity? I watch a lot of Fox television programs but I will not watch the interview with O.J. Simpson. I did watch this year's World Series and it saddens me to see that unless two large cities play in the World Series it is reported that it does not receive high ratings. I really wonder about the television rating systems...I don't know of any family that is part of the Neilson Rating program.

  11. Allan Grant from Metro Networks
    commented on: November 20, 2006 at 1:24 PM
    The fact that this is even an issue shows the lack of intelligence at the decision making level of Fox. Aren't there *any* grown-ups at that company?

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In
WAYNE FRIEDMAN
  • Wayne Friedman is West Coast Editor of MediaPost.



ARCHIVES

Recent TV Watch Articles
Who Gets Marketing Value From Letterman's Super Bowl Promo?   
David Letterman appeared in a promo during the Super Bowl with Oprah Winfrey and Jay Leno....
So Your TV Show Didn't Piss Off Anyone. Are You Off The Hook, Or Off The Air?   
If it's MTV's "Jersey Shore," or a foul-mouthed rock star presenter at an awards show, or...
Congress Wonders If Comcast/NBC Merger Will Make Consumers Happy    
How can we tell if the Comcast-NBC merger will be a good thing? Here are some...
Big-Event TV Is Back: Will Smaller Screens Be A Game-Changer?    
Make TV events bigger, and everyone should be happy. Or maybe not -- how about viewers...
TV Providers Want More Info About Viewers -- But Will They Pay The Price?   
Media companies want to seed interest in TV shows, networks, and services, on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace,...
Whom Do Viewers Trust In TV News? Fox Leads List, But Truth Is Complex   
Fox is the "most trusted" name in TV news, at least according to its recent advertisements....
TV Series Finales: Maybe There's More   
When does a TV series really end? ABC says this is the final season of "Lost"...
TV Executives And Talent Who Sucker-Punch And Live To Tell About It   
Had enough of Leno and O'Brien? Not us. We're punch-drunk with late-night love. Seems Jay Leno...
TV Shows Need To Be MultiDimensional -- With A Brand Manager Attached   
A really successful TV show doesn't have much to do with actual pixels, cast salaries, or...
TV Advocacy Commercials? Give Them All Equal Weight, If You Can   
CBS might have had better timing for its decision to ease restrictions on advocacy commercials. The...
>> TV Watch Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2010 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com