Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
When Will We Deliver On The Promise?
by Dave Morgan, Thursday, January 25, 2007, 1:33 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

It's hard not to get caught up in the online ad market's optimistic frenzy these days. Online ad spending continues to grow at an extraordinary rate. More and more of the largest brand marketers, who were slow to the party, are embracing online campaigns. Offline competition continues to take body blows as they struggle with audience fragmentation and newly forceful demands from their advertisers for more accountability and a better return on investment.

However, as well as the online ad market is generally developing, we also need to remain acutely aware of the many areas where we are not doing a very good job. That's the reminder that I got loud and clear earlier this week responding to an audience question while participating on a panel at the DLD (Digital, Life, Design) conference in Munich, a thought-provoking gathering of folks involved in digital media, design and the arts that was a stopover for many of the folks headed to Davos and the World Economic Forum later in the week.

The multipart question was: When will the online advertising industry actually deliver on its outstanding promise of the last decade to present the right ad to the right person at the right time? When will we finally deliver a consumer experience where the vast majority of ads that we deliver are meaningful, and not junk and clutter on Web pages?

The questioner was someone who knows something about the consumer's online experience -- Walt Mossberg, personal technology columnist for The Wall Street Journal. His point was that the online ad industry is always touting its extraordinary technical capabilities to target relevant ads -- a point that I had just been emphasizing -- but from his perspective, we are still giving consumers a terrible experience when it comes to the vast majority of ads that we place on their Web pages.

It doesn't take much research to recognize that he is right. You could ask almost anyone you know who surfs the Web whether or not they think that the Web ads they see are relevant, or you could look at the research that's been done in this area. According to a 2005 Roper Public Affairs study, only 21% of people said that advertising adds to their enjoyment of the Internet, versus 47% for magazines and 47% for newspapers. Whether we want to believe it or not, we have to accept the implied criticism as valid. Consider:

  • The online ad industry has been investing billions of dollars to create systems to improve the relevance of ads -- but in fact, the total volume of ads that are truly relevant to users is probably less than 20% of all of the ads that are served, and most of that is targeted to editorial adjacency. Outside of search, which represents less than 2% of all Web pages viewed, precision targeting, where ads are truly targeted by user data or user behaviors, probably represents only a few percentage points of all online ads.

  • We have too many ads on most of our pages. Too many Web sites still look like Times Square at night: lots of crazy colored ads all shouting at once. While many of the top content sites have dramatically improved in this area, far too many sites are addicted to just adding another ad unit every time that they have a new revenue opportunity. We have to learn how to say no more, and make pricing better reflect share of voice and share of audience.

  • While rich media has certainly made many of the ads that consumers see more robust, they also have a long way to go. Ads with images that move constantly and distract the eye are annoying to consumers, and most rich-media ads can be so much more informative than they are today. Clearly, one of the reasons that consumers like ads in magazines and newspapers is that both of those media have done a great job presenting valuable information in their ad spaces.

    I am confident that we will resolve these issues. To put things in perspective, we as an industry were almost left for dead only five years ago. Only three years ago, you couldn't use the word "optimistic" to describe how most folks in the industry felt. We've come a long way since then. And I think that several key trends over the next few years will bring solutions to these problems.

  • More marketers and advertisers embracing the Web will mean a wider variety of ads designed specifically for different kinds of people, Web sites and content. Just increasing the available pool of ads that we have to deliver will make a big difference in improving the ad experience for consumers.

  • Technology will start to fade into the background. I am sure that when radio and television were new, much of the focus was on the technology that powered them, from the transmission towers to the tubes in the sets. Over time, the technology disappeared into the background as the listening and viewing experience became better and more central to the consumer experience. That will happen here as well. Someday soon, we as consumers will look back and find it hard to believe all of the time and attention we gave to issues like browsers, media player plug-ins and powering up.

  • Creative units will dramatically improve. This is coming. I know that it is slow, but it is happening. Online ads in general are getting better.

    When will we get to the point that consumers will find online ads as enjoyable as magazine advertising? I believe that this may happen as soon as the end of 2008. Why? Because I see so much progress going on behind the scenes in the core organization and processes of how we plan, create, deliver, measure and optimize online media and advertising; I see so much new competition coming into this space; and, most important, I see so much focus now on the consumer experience, that I am confident that this will happen more quickly than most would probably expect.

    1 person recommends this article. 
  • 7 comments on "When Will We Deliver On The Promise? "

    1. Steven Comfort from hi5 Networks
      commented on: January 28, 2007 at 1:09 AM
      The problem with "irrelvant" ads isn't targeting technologies, it's the simple fact that we consume more web pages than there are targeted campaigns booked against them...

    2. Ari Kaufman from Advertising Online, Reactionary with Insight
      commented on: January 26, 2007 at 10:59 AM
      Solid arguments Dave, and a very positive outlook. I think to see the conformity trend makes a lot of sense. But I also think that repurposing existing technologies presents the opportunity to put the right ad in front of the right person now. I don't know how you answered Walk Mossberg's question, but he is not alone in that inquiry. It is a popular question and one that I know TACODA aims to answer with BT. Putting the right ad in front of the right person at the right time is the golden nugget. Knowing how to recognize the righth person is the major task. BT does it with the prospecting of anonymous individuals as we know. Customer re-targeting can establish the same capability through first party ad serving as I have argued in the past. Together these two technologies can enable an advertiser to put the right message in front of prospects and customers while advertising on the web in real-time. The composition of the advertising audience can be measured so that customers no longer get re-prospected with promotional messages and customers get driven towward recurring revenue-minded actions. Putting the right message in front of the right person at the right time makes the advertising relevant.

      Reactionary with Insight. www.arikaufman.com

    3. kent kirschner from Neighborhood America
      commented on: January 26, 2007 at 10:54 AM
      Dave,

      An excellent piece. You didn't really expand too much on what the future holds in the way of video advertising and its effectiveness. I've been on ABC.com and watched a couple of their shows and found that a sponsorship of Desperate Housewives by an advertiser is fine with me and in one case I actually engaged with the ad. I think targeting will become much more relevant when the internet more fully transforms television content and viewing.

    4. Nicholas Wright from Wireless World Forum
      commented on: January 26, 2007 at 8:16 AM
      Interesting stats consumer enjoyment about online vs. magazine advertising. I think consumers do enjoy some ads on the internet but that, in many cases, opinions in this consumer study were proabably skewed by annoying pop-up ads and flash-based adverts that distract and are inappropriate to content. As you say, the crucial problem is the proliferation of advertising that is required for revenue but conflicts with consumers' wishes. It's still about putting money before the worthwhile consumer experience and this continues to surprise me. Everyone in this scenario loses out: The consumer is annoyed, the site loses credibility and possibly a reader/viewer, the advertiser loses a potential customer.

      I agree with Mark on this one. While targeted, limited advertising is counterintuitive in terms of short-term revenue sources for websites often desperate for cash, it is the only way to actually satisfy everyone and help advertising achieve its objectives: selling products and postive brand awareness.

      PS I wouldn't say that magazine advertising presents "valuable information" to the consumer, unless you include entertainment value in that. Magazine advertising is content, internet advertising is often spam-like in its random, uninspired aproach. The main reason people like magazines is that they can browse (ie. choose) what they look at and how long they do so. A Rich Media ad next to text is often like someone poking you in the arm while you're trying to concentrate.

    5. Ji-Hae Han from SmartTravelAsia.Com
      commented on: January 25, 2007 at 8:30 PM
      All that you say is far too true, Dave!

      We have been doing this for FIVE years, before anyone dared to create a magazine, 100% online.

      Please check us out at http://www.smarttravelasia.com, Asia's ONLY online travel magazine.

    6. Joe Marchese from Yet to be named start-up
      commented on: January 25, 2007 at 5:21 PM
      Very well put Dave. Excellent piece. I share your optimism, and belief, that this will happen far more quickly than people might expect.

    7. Marc Bodner from The Bodner Consulting Group
      commented on: January 25, 2007 at 3:32 PM
      It's an interesting conversation, one that has new media acting like old media. The traditional printed media used ads to pay the bills and they collected ads from anyone who had the money to pay for the aggregated eyeballs. Online media took that model and will sell to anyone who has the money to pay for the aggregated eyeballs, relevant or not. Yes BT is supposed to help, but no publisher or ad network wants to turn cash away, so anything that may linmit the amount of cash taken in, or potential pool of ad revenue will ultimately be compromised. There are products being launched, like eTAGZ, which are rich media portable websites attached to conumer products and distributed at retail, that do fulfill a great deal of the promise of real relevancy and add value to the consumer experience. Marketing is limited, and content is integrated. However going back to the larger companies, I just don't see how a company with financial goals in the billions can deliver on the full promise and still meet their objectives.

    Leave a Comment

    You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

    Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

    DAVE MORGAN
    • Dave Morgan is the CEO of Simulmedia. Previously, he founded and ran both TACODA and Real Media.


    AUTHORS

    ARCHIVES

    Recent Online Spin Articles
    The Loss Of Apprenticeships Is A Tragedy    
    I had breakfast earlier this week with Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack, a friend who is...
    Time To Eliminate Vacation Policies?   
    There was quite a stir a few months ago when an internal presentation about how Netflix...
    A Simple Prediction For 2010    
    I've decided that making predictions in a climate which is so tenuous and conservative could be...
    Understanding Social Media 2.0: The Widget Is Dead    
    The Internet was around for many years before it got its "2.0" designation. Social media has...
    How News Spreads Today: The Media-tization Of The Big Black Phone    
    When I was a kid, a phone ringing in the middle of the night meant only...
    Caskets? Great Deals At Costco   
    'm not easy to market to. I'm loyal to few brands. I shun most advertising. I'm...
    End The Debate: Go Ahead, Charge For Your Online Content    
    "Web communism" and "ubiquity is the new exclusivity" were among the lines being traded in a...
    Coupon Clippers Proven To Drive Incremental Sales   
    Digital couponing has risen dramatically in the last 12 months because consumers are more concerned with...
    The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace   
    There is a race going on that a lot of people don't fully understand -- but...
    Brand Velocity And Your Business Model   
    We often affirm the necessity of thoughtful consumer brand marketing that conveys and sustains the brand....
    >> Online Spin Archives 
    ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
    ©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
    1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
    tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com