Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Which Major Newspaper Will Be First?
by Dave Morgan, Thursday, April 5, 2007, 4:16 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

 As regular readers know, I like to write about the newspaper industry from time to time. Not only did I work in the industry earlier in my career, but like many of us, I have a deep personal attachment to the product. I love reading news. I love reading newspapers. Newspapers have been in the news lately, with this week’s announcement of Sam Zell’s highly leveraged effort to buy the Tribune Company just one of a number of a number of “big” recent stories about the industry and the future path of newspaper publishing companies. So, with that as a backdrop, I ask you, “Which major newspaper will be first?”

No. I don’t mean which major metropolitan U.S. newspaper will be the first to collapse under its own weight and shut down, though I do expect that we will probably see one of those yet this year, or early next. In this case, I am focused on something more positive. I want to know which major newspaper will truly and dramatically change its business model and recognize that digital is its future and mass print is its past. Which newspaper will recognize that the headlines that it keeps publishing about its own businesses -- “newspaper ad revenue down 3% year over year” or “newspaper ad revenue was soft again last quarter” or “newspaper circulation fell 6% over last year” -- are not going away?

Ad revenue in most large newspaper markets will keep dropping 3-5% per year for the next five years. Real circulation -- excluding the tons of papers dumped on schools, hotels and the constantly-churning “free ten-week trial”  -- will keep dropping 3-7% per year for the next five years. Those two things are going to happen. Major metropolitan newspapers are largely powerless to stop them. Why? It’s simple. Every day, fewer people are reading daily newspapers than did the day before. Every day, more people are using the Internet for their news and information. Every day, the cost of energy, health care, pension benefits, wages, ink and newsprint in the cost-heavy industry goes up. Every day, more talented people leave the industry than join it. Every day, someone somewhere launches another new niche media product -- many times, a print product -- that continues to whittle away advertising revenue. That is daily newspapers’ future, and they must confront it.

What are most large daily newspapers doing about this? First, many deny it. Time and time again you hear them say “the decline will plateau” or “we’re just a quarter away from an uptick.”  Denial is bad. It prevents the implementation of solutions.

Then, there are those that grudgingly accept the decline but think that it will be long and slow and controllable, and that digital revenue will grow as print revenues declines, thus insuring the long-term life of the franchise.

That kind of vision would be nice if the newspaper business didn’t have an enormous fixed cost structure, but it does. There is not much difference in costs to print 5% fewer newspapers. You still need the presses and the sorters and the trucks and the press operators and the truck drivers. You still need the newsroom. You still need the sales staff. Of course, you don’t necessarily need the baseball team. Most newspapers have been responding to their declining financial fortunes -- and loss of favor with Wall Street -- by incrementally reducing the cost structures of their business. They have been cutting bit by bit, quarter over quarter. Laying off, and then laying off again.

Not only has this slow death killed morale at the papers, but it has typically been done with no vision for the future. The only future for those who survive cuts is hope that they will survive the next as well. Death by a thousand cuts -- not a great way to operate a healthy business.

What else are they doing? They are mashing together their fledging and fast-growing digital businesses with their tired and declining print businesses. It helps hide the print revenue decline -- a bit. It helps the print folks make their numbers -- a bit. It creates the opportunity to tout a vision of “integration” -- a bit. It demoralizes and scares away many of the very best digital talent -- a lot. For example, anybody who thinks that online salespeople and print salespeople are alike, sell alike, think alike, or truly want to work together, has not spent much time with both of them or truly asked for and listened to their opinions.

What should declining metropolitan newspapers do instead (and even those not yet declining, but soon to follow?

  • They should dramatically shrink their core mass reach product and its cost structure. When I say dramatically, I mean dramatically -- by 40% or 50%. This will not only mean publishing less in the paper, it will mean publishing a lot less papers, maybe one-half as many. Newspapers need only watch the U.S. auto industry to understand why they need to do this. They must get much, much smaller. Stop dropping massive, multi-pound treatises on people’s doorsteps that fewer than 5% of the recipients can even think about reading cover to cover, and instead execute a massive shift into niche and non-daily publishing. Print can still be a great medium, just not the way that most large newspapers practice it today.
  • They should quickly get rid of their sacred cows. This means everything from embracing -- and respecting -- content from their readers to selling off their printing presses and paper companies to changing the way they work with advertisers and selling them measurable results, not just space.

 

  • Stop or unwind the forced digital integrations. Their digital media businesses might share the same brand name, and some of the content, but the future of local digital media is worlds away from the past of print newspapers. Forcing them together only serves to slow down the immediacy with which the print side will confront its decline and guarantees that the digital side will never be a viable long-term competitor for the hearts, minds and pocketbooks of local audiences and advertisers.

I am sure that I will get some flack about this column when I attend the Newspaper Association of America Publisher Conference in New York next week. But I think that most of the great newspaper folks know in their heart that I am right. The future of newspapers is not about a slow “controlled descent.” Things never work out that way. It is about implementing aggressive, proactive and -- for the newspaper industry -- radical changes to survive and thrive in the future.

 

 

1 person recommends this article. 

17 comments on "Which Major Newspaper Will Be First? "

  1. Bill Hornung from RNR Partners
    commented on: April 15, 2007 at 1:09 PM
    As a fellow former print journalist, I concur with your assessment of the newspaper biz. The local rags have a huge opportunity before them if the seize the high ground before it's too late. They can truly offer the best of both worlds... a slimmer, trimmer print product combined with depth, creativity and instant user involvement of online. European newspapers have done this for decades... not because of the web, but for the same economic reasons you state. I left the newspaper business in the mid-80s when I saw "traditionalists" bemoan USA Today. I knew the industry was too slow-moving for me when co-workers scoffed at why anybody would want color pictures and large weather maps in a newspaper.

  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited
    commented on: April 11, 2007 at 11:22 AM
    True, most of the newspapers have created their own demise - 20% + profit necessities, management off the crazies' wall, disconnect to the employees and clients including many rah rah redherring propositions, turning away millions and millions of dollars for accounts which only desire is to match other major pubs CPM's along with other pricing disgraces, promotional bombs prior to the get go (my particular favorite was the Ad Director's Yellow Fever with Scarlet Fever as the next level), keeping the same creative person on the same one account for 30 years, inexcusable lack of intelligent knowledge and planning, wasting millions upon millions on redundant, unresponsive to their needs internal systems, lack of allowing input and follow through with programs to enhance their life...I could go on with more specifices, but.....But is that the downturn of newspapers is a negative in an assumingly supposedly free society. Any paper which still wants to sincerely wants help to keep their heart, importance and profit ability - 610-212-9973.

  3. Monica Woodworth from Sacbee.com
    commented on: April 09, 2007 at 4:18 PM
    Completely correct!

  4. Michael Cox from M&J Southwest, Inc
    commented on: April 09, 2007 at 3:49 PM
    Newspaper people love tradition, even if it kills them. When offset replaced hot type, the adaptation was slow and painful in most markets. Even though the unions were killing them, a lot of the big city dailies went under rather than change. When it came time to get digital in the newsroom and in composing we dragged most of our people kicking and screaming into the new age. I asked some old friends in the newspaper business what they thought the future held for their industry. To a man (and woman) they said, honestly, they didn't know. A lot of papers are going to just go away and some will do as you suggest, but it will be painful to watch. Unofortunately it will still be "paper" people running a digital business--mounted cavalry trying to fight tanks that have GPS and laser-guided weapons.

  5. Darin Ingalls from James Tower
    commented on: April 09, 2007 at 11:57 AM
    I think what we are seeing is the begining of the end for Newspapers and Broadcast TV as we knew it. Its all about the distribution of information and transfer of ad revenue and placement. Those papers and TV stations that have strong positions in the online arena will be just fine. Small localized and neighborhood papers may actually be the answer to print distribution. They just need to shift the content and ad dollars. And as many others have indicated the death of many newspapers is not just related to the medium of print. Content plays a big role in that as well. I had a hard time paying for other peoples opinions...give me the facts and let me decide on the implications. My only concern is what happens when I need to start a fire in the fire place? Will I need to resort to buying paper to burn?

  6. Jeff Gomez from Holtzbrinck Publishers
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 1:26 PM
    You're very much on the right track; print needs to change and adapt to not only a digital mindset, but an increasingly clear digital reality.

    Read more about it on my blog Print is Dead:

    http://www.printisdeadblog.com

  7. Mark Metz from MetroGuide.com, Inc.
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 12:09 PM
    The web has decoupled the newspaper's profit centers (classifieds, retail advertising) from the loss leader that is the news and editorial operations. Sites that offer classifieds, business listings, etc., are sucking away that revenue. A whole new generation of CraigsList users have never picked up a paper and never will, and they won't be going to a newspaper website either. So, having a stake in Classifieds Ventures and ShopLocal is not going to be enough to capture that lost revenue back. Newspapers need to not just revamp their news operations, but recapture their position as the market leaders in their profit centers. They just don't seem to get that. As a strictly personal comment: their biggest problem is not just the web, though. I cancelled my subscription to my local paper because I just got sick of the agenda-driven, biased news stories, mostly coming from the AP. I understand that many people don't believe that there's political bias injected into the news reporting, but there are millions of people who feel that way and they can, like me, get all their news from RSS headlines (which is not technically the "web," since a browser is not needed).

  8. Jason Klein from Newspaper National Network
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 9:31 AM
    Dave, my friend,

    Most major metropolitan newspapers ARE ALREADY FIRST in providing a local online gateway with sites like boston.com and sfgate.com.

    The local online business is still in its early stages, and local print will continue to be a larger and more profitable business for awhile, especially if newspaper companies ignore your recommendations to slash their print editions prematurely. The newspaper challenge is to invest for clear leadership in the local online arena, and one of the benefits of moving to new, non-public ownership is that they can manage the print to online conversion with a longer-term orientation.

    The future of digital media is not “worlds away� from a well run newspaper Company which is fully focused on its sustaining and building its local franchise.

    Jason E. Klein President and CEO Newspaper National Network LP www.nnnlp.com

  9. Greg White from iEntry, Inc.
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 9:13 AM
    A single voice of reason in the jungle.

  10. Henry Hoke III from Hoke Communications, Inc.
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 8:38 AM
    David,

    I feel you are right on target with all that you wrote.

    The sad urth is people are letting og of newspapers and magazines.

    HRH III

  11. Paul Camp from Content That Works
    commented on: April 06, 2007 at 7:45 AM
    The fact is most newspapers still return upwards of 20% of revenue to the bottom line. Most businesses in the U.S. would kill for similar margins. Until profitability shrinks to below 10% massive changes such as you suggest will be slow in coming.

    As you say the "core" daily news product must shrink. In the future newspapers will offer a digest of the important news of the day with a guide to finding the best additional information on the Web.

    At the same time, however, newspapers must shake off their traditional mile wide and inch deep approach to coverage of everything from local politics to Grandma's favorite recipes. Instead they must identify the true passions of their reading audiences and get deep and vertical in their coverage of those passions. This will be a challenge indeed. But if they succeed in this mission newspapers will continue to be the strongest local media brand going and will hold the high ground in the battle for local eyeballs and ad dollars.

  12. Gary Senser from NetAdvantage
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 8:15 PM
    You're absolutely right. In order to move forward, newspapers will have to re-define their future. Maybe they should think of themselves as being in the "news business" rather than the "newspaper business". With unlimited distribution made possible by the Internet, newspapers must re-think their product and business models. This is not unlike the challenge being faced by the big media companies. The future will look very different from the past. Now is the time to experiment and try new things. Continuing down the same path with the expectation of better results is very risky.

  13. Jeffrey DeArmond from Revedia. Inc.
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 7:41 PM
    I remember growing up in the deep south (northern Florida) when old southern gentlemen in overalls used the expression “that dog don’t hunt�! After reading your article that particular expression came to mind. I think newspapers should do something dramatically different than they are? I think that if newspapers don’t do something dramatically different they will continue the road to attrition? I was in the newspaper industry – a while ago, but I’ve always been in the media sales and marketing arena. For the past 14 years I’ve had a blessed and passionate career in Internet Marketing and Interactive Media Sales - I’ve been out and away from the print industry for that long. But it doesn’t take a mental antelope (my expression!) to figure out that print media is weakening! Print is expensive to produce and it takes too many people to make it work and even though Dave Morgan likes to read the newspaper - not a growing number of other people want to? By the way Dave Im a dying breed too! The Internet is going to keep growing. Now newspapers could take more advantage of what they still have left…Brand & Content! If newspapers could only invest in innovatively developing and delivering that content digitally they could really turn things around and make some big things happen. I thought I knew that newspapers could afford and probably try to hire really smart digital marketing people to figure this Internet thing out. But I’m beginning to doubt that? Newspapers might want to begin to create digital properties that are an extension of what they already have accomplished in the way of brand & content? These digital properties have got to make sense and offer consumers lifestyle benefits? Also these digital properties must be partnered with other digital properties to gain exposure and reach? Print links can help too! In your own newspapers! Let’s not forget about the advertisers – these digital properties must provide a rich platform to contextual interactive media buys – local and national. Wow it was great for a moment to imagine all the digital property possibilities that a major newspaper could realize? Newspapers might want to embrace the concept of social networking and search? Newspapers still have enough money to invest and create agnostic digital properties that are based solely on local consumer content and local lifestyle benefits. They could leverage agnostic digital properties once profitable? I love newspaper people too – they don’t have to die! They just need to turn into Internet people, quick! Jeffrey DeArmond President www.Revedia.com Cell: 727-278-6295

  14. Tom Hernandez from SpecificMEDIA, Inc.
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 7:28 PM
    Dave: Be sure to read - Web vs. Print: Online Successes at One Newspaper Raise More Questions Than They Answer Published: April 04, 2007 http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/

  15. Porter Bibb from MediaTech Capital Partrners
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 7:21 PM
    Dave: as a former Corp. Dev. Director at the New York Times Company, I (and many within upper management at the Times) saw all this coming years ago and began advocating exactly what you have articulated today. Fighting the editorial baronies and a family-owner mentality, however, was too much of an uphill battle. Perhaps now, with the handwriting etched so clearly on their brows, will the smart folks who run the newspaper business start to listen. It won't take Sam Zell five minutes to understand the sense of your suggestions. Changing the mindsets of dyed in the wool newspaper owners may take a bit longer. PORTER BIBB, MediaTech Capital Partners LLC

  16. Dan Seidler from Side By Side Marketing
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 6:44 PM
    A stark reality that change is inevitable, whether newspaper organizations embrace it by directing it toward profitability, or succomb to it by their demise. However, shrinking the core mass product only serves to perpetuate the demise. That is what a paper offers that is different. Consumers already have multiple sources of 'snippet' news: 20-45 seconds with TV news coverage, 'highlights' on radio breakaways. But they will never read an online vehicle 'cover to cover' as it were. A few articles, then it's distraction or other surfing to pull them away. The ability to expound on a story is the one thing print still has (although in typical writers style, the prime points are made first, then digress as the story goes further - allowing for edit). Every other media outlet has an "online" version. Far too many are knock offs of the same. True revolution will take a new perspective to what is being offered. Integration works as collaborative efforts, when one supports and directs further use of the other. The transition from print is, and has been underway and making strides. From digital coupons to real estate and automotive mainstays moving to online - core print supporters - the new revenue stream cannot come fast enough to save the print industry. But the value of sitting back with a good read, the ability to peruse the paper while sitting in the hot tub or 'in the facility', and the potential for much more news and information to be actually explored - that is their current appeal. Embellish your core - and figure out the best way to utilize other support media to maximize that reach. The new audience can then become an additional revenue source.

  17. Ken Tremayne from Media News
    commented on: April 05, 2007 at 6:25 PM
    If the market demand for print vs. digital is what controls the "descent" why is that bad. That way it happens when it happens. Is it good to force some people to get their news from a screen before they are ready?

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

DAVE MORGAN
  • Dave Morgan is the CEO of Simulmedia. Previously, he founded and ran both TACODA and Real Media.


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES

Recent Online Spin Articles
The Loss Of Apprenticeships Is A Tragedy    
I had breakfast earlier this week with Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack, a friend who is...
Time To Eliminate Vacation Policies?   
There was quite a stir a few months ago when an internal presentation about how Netflix...
A Simple Prediction For 2010    
I've decided that making predictions in a climate which is so tenuous and conservative could be...
Understanding Social Media 2.0: The Widget Is Dead    
The Internet was around for many years before it got its "2.0" designation. Social media has...
How News Spreads Today: The Media-tization Of The Big Black Phone    
When I was a kid, a phone ringing in the middle of the night meant only...
Caskets? Great Deals At Costco   
'm not easy to market to. I'm loyal to few brands. I shun most advertising. I'm...
End The Debate: Go Ahead, Charge For Your Online Content    
"Web communism" and "ubiquity is the new exclusivity" were among the lines being traded in a...
Coupon Clippers Proven To Drive Incremental Sales   
Digital couponing has risen dramatically in the last 12 months because consumers are more concerned with...
The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace   
There is a race going on that a lot of people don't fully understand -- but...
Brand Velocity And Your Business Model   
We often affirm the necessity of thoughtful consumer brand marketing that conveys and sustains the brand....
>> Online Spin Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com