Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Brand Evolution Vs. Brand Revolution
by Cory Treffiletti, Wednesday, June 20, 2007, 9:45 AM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

How often do you get to sit down and think about the answer to the question, "what is a brand?" I'm relatively lucky because I get to sit and think about it almost everyday. I used to not be a believer in the power of brands, but I eventually changed my tune and feel they are indeed necessary to achieve lasting growth when you build a company, product or service. That being said, the last few years have seen a radical evolution in the way a brand is built and managed, almost to the point where the evolution of a brand is more of a revolution of the brand.

In order to understand the difference, we need to revisit the definition of a brand. The dictionary definition is as follows:
1. Kind, grade, or make, as indicated by a stamp, trademark, or the like: the best brand of coffee.
2. A mark made by burning or otherwise, to indicate kind, grade, make, ownership, etc.
3. A mark formerly put upon criminals with a hot iron. (note: thankfully, this is not in wide use anymore and not relevant for this discussion)

A couple of other definitions further down the page go as follows:
11. To impress indelibly: The plane crash was branded on her mind.
12. To give a brand name to: branded merchandise.
13. To promote as a brand name.

Source: Dictionary.com

Summarizing these various definitions, I see that a brand is a unique descriptor tied to one product, idea or service. It is meant to impress upon the viewer or audience a message that describes the product and differentiates it from the competition. The problem is that people spend a lot of money to try and broadcast a brand to their customers -- and historically, they've never reacted to what the audience tells them their brand truly is!

In marketing today, the power of a brand is in defining the experience. If the promise of the experience matches the actual experience itself, then your brand is what you said it is. If the experience is different than the promise, then you have to listen to the audience and adjust accordingly.

The evolution of a brand would be a gradual change that meets the needs of the current customer. If you look at the strongest brands in U.S. history, you will see their gradual evolution, especially in the world of packaged goods, which tends to listen well to customers and evolve its messaging over time.

The revolution of brands comes when you see immediate changes to the brand itself as a direct result of customer experience. In today's marketplace, the changes happen more rapidly and as a direct result of customer feedback. In truth, the power of your brand is directly proportional to the speed at which you can respond.

For example, auto manufacturers are in a rut these days, especially those based on the U.S. The Detroit Three, as they are now called, are not reacting quickly to the feedback and the needs of their customers, and as a result we are seeing the gradual decline of these companies and their brands. Toyota, on the other hand, has built a business that rivals and in some cases exceeds the traditional leadership, based on listening to the customer. It is developing hybrid vehicles and hipper, newer brands to be customized, such as Scion. Toyota utilizes digital media to create a connection with the consumer and provide an immediate line for feedback on an ongoing basis.

Additionally, the company recognizes the "remix culture" (as coined by Radar Research), and provides a means for its brand to integrate into this culture. By doing so, Toyota takes the chance that the consumer may react negatively, or change the overall impression of its brand. But it takes that risk willingly, knowing that success is dependent on delivering what you promise. If you deliver on the promise, your brand will succeed.

The Brand Revolution comes from this simple fact: Your brand is only as strong as the tie between the message and the people who react to it. The revolution is in the hands of the consumer. It is very much a bourgeois revolution, run by the masses, for the masses, and by the masses. That means, if you let them control your brand, but you deliver on its promise, then it will succeed. This is not something that everyone is comfortable with, hence the revolution concept. Sometimes you have to leave your comfort zone in order to succeed.

It's not new, I know. Many, many Internet brands are doing it, in publishing as well as television. That's why "Heroes" does so well. That's why "Lost" is doing so well (again). It's why reality TV does so well. It's because they invite the consumer along for the ride, and they listen and they react. They invite consumers into the process to define the mark that will be "impressed indelibly on the mind of the consumer," thereby affecting the actual brand itself.

It's really just a matter of perspective and trust. If you have the new perspective, and you trust in your consumer, then success can be achieved!

Don't you agree?

9 comments on "Brand Evolution Vs. Brand Revolution"

  1. Rapidshare download from Fileshunt
    commented on: March 27, 2008 at 1:13 PM
    "So you can find the information on it on my search resource http://fileshunt.com"

  2. M Bhave from mouthshut.com
    commented on: July 04, 2007 at 7:49 AM
    "If you have the new perspective, and you trust in your consumer, then success can be achieved!" - That if is huge Cory. Trust in a consumer has to still mature. It has to go beyond corporate relations of just using for test marketing, just using for feedback etc. It has to be branded that the customer is being used to CREATE better for all the others out there.. Strictly my feeling, Regards, M Bhave

  3. Roy Perry from Greater Media Philadelphia
    commented on: June 24, 2007 at 9:50 AM
    Cory, you are consistently one of the best, most perceptive observers out there but I think you need to go a little deeper on this one. "The power of your brand is directly proportional to the speed at which you can respond" is typical now-think, wildly popular with those who are impatient with and resentful of the time it actually takes to win as a brand. The correct word for that sentence is "product", a somewhat shallower concept better suited to the speed of adjustment possible in today's world. Brand is not a message you send, it's the message that comes back, but it's not the message that came back this morning. Real Brands take time and repeated experience and contain unmanufacturable earned emotion, sorry about that. Every high school girl knows the difference between "he likes me" and "he LIKES ME likes me" and a similar dynamic is at play here. There is depth, weight and history to a Real Brand and fiddling with such a recipe every couple of minutes based on the mood swings of the most fickle consumers since the earth cooled is absurd. On-the-fly modification may be a tempting approach now that it's mechanically possible and we're experiencing an oversupply of impatient folks who know how to do it but that's insufficient support for calling it a good idea.

  4. Toli Cefail from In Touch Media Group
    commented on: June 21, 2007 at 1:01 AM
    I agree whole heartedly. We insist that our clients conduct surveys of their customers and prospective customers routinely and adapt their products, packaging, marketing strategies and even pricing accordingly.

    Sometimes they listen and sometimes they don't but staying "in touch" with your consumers is the only way to really make a brand strong (and profitable!). -- Toli

  5. Marissa Gluck from Radar Research
    commented on: June 20, 2007 at 5:46 PM
    hey cory - thanks for the shout out!

  6. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@verizon.net
    commented on: June 20, 2007 at 2:07 PM
    Missing above:

    Brand/Product -- quality, price, distribution, placement of product, marketing, creative, product placement, competition, timing along with sufficient time - all to fall "correctly" within a chain of events.

    So this coming weekend, you can hula hoop, pet your pet rock, walk your invisible dog, say Halo to your halo and Barak your Obama. Enjoy!

  7. danielle stealy from ChaCha Search Inc
    commented on: June 20, 2007 at 12:50 PM
    I believe there is a nice middle road to this idea. There is definitely some power in guiding consumers to what a company would like to portray as brand image. There is power in creating an image. Where many companies lack is following through with that image from start to finish. To enhance a brand it is critical to listen to a consumer's feedback and react. Unless there is a conversation with the consumer, there can be no absolute way to ensure satisfaction.

  8. Michael Durwin from FUSE/ideas
    commented on: June 20, 2007 at 10:10 AM
    It's great to see more marketers considering consumer feedback as a brand building necessity. I read an article from a guy named Andrew Keen that said that user-generated content was actually killing our culture. He actually said that media outlets; music, film, news, did a great job and were being hurt by UGC. What is made clear from this article however is that engaging the consumer either in conversation, consideration of feedback or consumer content can only help a guide a brand down a more consumer friendly path. It's a win-win situation. The consumer gets what they want from the brand and the brand gets increased consumer consideration either in terms or revenue, ambassadorship, marketshare, etc.

  9. Jonathan Hutter from Garrand Marketing Communications
    commented on: June 20, 2007 at 10:07 AM
    No

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

CORY TREFFILETTI
  • Cory is president and managing partner for Catalyst SF. Contact him here.


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES

Recent Online Spin Articles
The Loss Of Apprenticeships Is A Tragedy    
I had breakfast earlier this week with Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack, a friend who is...
Time To Eliminate Vacation Policies?   
There was quite a stir a few months ago when an internal presentation about how Netflix...
A Simple Prediction For 2010    
I've decided that making predictions in a climate which is so tenuous and conservative could be...
Understanding Social Media 2.0: The Widget Is Dead    
The Internet was around for many years before it got its "2.0" designation. Social media has...
How News Spreads Today: The Media-tization Of The Big Black Phone    
When I was a kid, a phone ringing in the middle of the night meant only...
Caskets? Great Deals At Costco   
'm not easy to market to. I'm loyal to few brands. I shun most advertising. I'm...
End The Debate: Go Ahead, Charge For Your Online Content    
"Web communism" and "ubiquity is the new exclusivity" were among the lines being traded in a...
Coupon Clippers Proven To Drive Incremental Sales   
Digital couponing has risen dramatically in the last 12 months because consumers are more concerned with...
The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace   
There is a race going on that a lot of people don't fully understand -- but...
Brand Velocity And Your Business Model   
We often affirm the necessity of thoughtful consumer brand marketing that conveys and sustains the brand....
>> Online Spin Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com