Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
The Changing Face of the Press Release
by Jack Loechner, Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 8:15 AM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES
TAGS:  Marketing, Research, Advertising

MOST READ

According to the Executive Summary of a study conducted by Fellows of the Society for New Communications Research and made possible by Vocus, the advent of new online communication channels, the goals, target audiences, and overall scope of press releases have transformed press releases themselves into a new communication tool used by public relations and marketing professionals alike.

The respondents' top goals for online press releases indicated that the traditional goals of increasing an organization's visibility and credibility and announcing news are now almost equally as important as new goals that include reaching customers directly, creating online content, and search engine optimization (SEO).

Goals For Online Press Releases (% of respondents)

Goals

Mean Score (5=very important)

Very Important

Neutral

Unimportant

Increased visibility & credibility

4.50

90.3%

8.2%

1.0%

Announcing news

4.30

79.6

16.0

4.4

Reaching customers/consumers

4.25

80.0

13.8

6.2

Creating Online content readily available

4.10

7.45

18.1

7.5

SEO optimization for website

4.09

1.1

18.6

10.3

Conduit to other Online sources of information

3.69

59.7

29.0

11.4

Using as sales tool

3.59

58.8

19.5

21.7

Reaching bloggers

3.57

56.3

23.6

20.0

Enhancing thought leadership

3.25

43.3

31.0

25.7

Source: Society for New Communications Research/Vocus, October 2008

While PR professionals placed more importance on traditional goals such as announcing news and enhancing thought leadership, marketing professionals reported SEO and reaching consumers as important goals for their online press releases. Small business owners were concerned with using the release as a sales tool and reaching customers directly.

Both traditional media and new media emerged as the top two most important audiences respondents hoped to reach with their online press releases. Bloggers and new media followed traditional media in importance, but were a very close second, separated by only 0.28 points on a 1-5 scale.

Audiences For Online Press Releases

Audience

Importance Mean (5=Very Important)

Traditional media

4.16

Bloggers and new media outlets

3.88

B2B consumers/customers & prospects

3.72

B2C consumers/customers & prospects

3.32

Webmasters to repurpose

3.27

MSAs - geographical targets

2.89

Partners

2.83

Financial analysts & investment community

2.47

Competitors

2.23

Source: Source: Society for New Communications Research/Vocus, October 2008

In terms of target audiences for online press releases, significant differences emerged between marketing and public relations professionals. Although both marketing and public relations professionals reported more than average importance for reaching traditional media, consumers, and webmasters that will repurpose the release, PR professionals were consistently more interested than marketing professionals in reaching traditional media.

Marketing professionals were consistently more interested than PR practitioners in reaching new media or consumers directly. For example:

  • PR professionals rated the importance of reaching traditional media an average 4.53 on a 1-5 scale, which is significantly higher than marketing professionals' rating of 3.82 
  • Similarly, marketing professionals rated the importance of reaching webmasters with an average 3.49 on a 1-5 scale, which is significantly higher than PR practitioners' rating of only 2.83

These results indicate that online press releases have been adopted as a communications tool by the marketing profession, says the report, but are being used very differently than they have traditionally been used by public relations professionals.

The most frequently mentioned criterion for evaluating the success of online press releases was:

  • The number of times the release has been republished on websites (79.6 percent)
  • The number of times the release has been viewed online (76.8 percent)
  • An article based on the release (75.4 percent)
  • Media interview requests as a result of the release (74.2 percent)

Interestingly, although marketing and public relations professionals seem to use online press releases differently, there were no statistically significant differences between the two in terms of the criteria they use for evaluating success. In fact, the evaluation criteria were homogenous across different size organizations and industry sectors as well. The only statistically significant difference identified young communication practitioners (under 30 years of age) as more interested than the other age groups in obtaining coverage on blogs and social media sites.

Open-ended responses to a different survey question indicate that higher level indicators such as "eyeballs" and "dollar value" are desired evaluation criteria of online press releases, but communication professionals do not know how to measure them, concludes the study.

Very few respondents indicated using social media release formats (26.3 percent) and even fewer reported adding video (12.8 percent) or audio (9 percent) enhancements. Of all multimedia elements, photos were the most popular, used in online press releases by 49.5 percent of respondents. Even more puzzling is that less than half of respondents (48.8 percent) link to their own press releases after they have been posted online.

The most frequently mentioned challenges of online press releases, grouped into categories according to the main themes, were:

  • Cutting through the clutter. This challenge speaks to the difficulty of getting a press release noticed in an information-rich environment. 
  • Targeting and distribution. Respondents often find it difficult to identify and target the specific audience for their press releases.
  • Measurement. Accurate evaluation of online press release results to include not only message distribution and exposure, but also evidence of audience receipt and behavior change was another perceived challenge.

Please visit here to retrieve the complete PDF Whitepaper release.

 

 

1 person recommends this article. 

5 comments on "The Changing Face of the Press Release"

  1. Dyann Espinosa from contact.com
    commented on: November 08, 2008 at 1:41 PM
    Was still hoping for a reply to my question about your statement. My question was: When you say that-- It is very telling that half of the respondents don’t link to their own press releases once they’ve been posted. Do you mean once the press release has been posted by a media outlet or by the PR firm or its client on their own website?

  2. Jack Loechner from Mediapost Communications
    commented on: November 04, 2008 at 2:22 PM
    thanks, Bruce, for the corrections...

  3. Dyann Espinosa from contact.com
    commented on: November 02, 2008 at 5:01 PM
    May I ask a naive question please. When you say that: It is very telling that half of the respondents don’t link to their own press releases once they’ve been posted. Do you mean once the press release has been posted by a media outlet or by the PR firm or its client on their own website? Thank you for the clarification.

  4. Bruce Oren from Classified Intelligence
    commented on: October 29, 2008 at 10:08 PM
    There are two bad numbers in the first table. Creating online content . . . Very important should be 74.5% instead of 7.45%; and SEO optimization . . . Very important should be 71.1% instead of 1.1%. Source: ROI of Online Press Releases study.

  5. Michael Durwin from FUSE/ideas
    commented on: October 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM
    I'm not surprised that so few PR respondents indicated using social media. By the same token I'm not surprised their press releases are getting so little attention while those who use social media are seeing great success. It is very telling that half of the respondents don't link to their own press releases once they've been posted. This shows that while they have latched on to buzz words and tactics for new media channels, they don't really understand them. A few weeks on Twitter would solve that.

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In
JACK LOECHNER
  • Center for Media Research



ARCHIVES

Recent Research Brief Articles
Economy Concern Declines, Optimism Rises   
As a complement to the annual Mendelsohn Affluent Survey, Ipsos Mendelsohn recently released another of its...
Matures Are Prolific E-Mailers, Online Shoppers   
Findings from the CTAM Pulse report, that includes data from the Life Stages & Life Styles...
Recession's Lasting Effects on Consumers   
A new study, entitled "Marketing to the Post-Recession Consumers," by Decitica, addresses the lasting effects of...
Endorsements Are A Mixed Bag   
According to the findings of a new Adweek Media/ Harris Poll, looking at celebrities and their...
Product Recommendations Come From Friends, Not Networks   
According to recent findings from MomConnection, The Parenting Group's research panel of 5,000 moms, 60% of...
PR Pros Split; Riding Both Horses   
According to recent poll of corporate communicators conducted by Ragan Communications and PollStream, 49% of today's...
Like, Totally Wired   
According to findings from Alloy Media + Marketing's 9th annual College Explorer Survey, projected annual technology...
Global Consumers Support "Good Cause" Companies    
According to new findings from the 3rd annual Edelman Consumer Study, 57% of consumers globally say...
Newspaper Execs And Readers View Online News Availability Differently    
American Press Institute, with ITZ Publishing and Belden Interactive, recently published initial results of a study...
Radio Dominant Audio Device   
According to a Nielsen analysis of a media study conducted by the Council for Research Excellence,...
>> Research Brief Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com