Time Warner Delays Pay-Per-Download Plan

fiber optic cablesFaced with consumer backlash and pressure from lawmakers, Time Warner is retreating from a controversial plan to roll out a new pay-per-download pricing system.

"It is clear from the public response over the last two weeks that there is a great deal of misunderstanding about our plans to roll out additional tests on consumption based billing," Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt said Thursday in a statement. "As a result, we will not proceed with implementation of additional tests until further consultation with our customers and other interested parties."

Two weeks ago, Time Warner said it would test a new metered billing plan in four cities -- Austin and San Antonio (Texas), Greensboro, N.C. and Rochester, N.Y. In those markets, the company would charge consumers based on bandwidth consumed. Subscriptions would have ranged from $15 a month for 1 GB to $150 a month for unlimited bandwidth. Currently, many Time Warner customers pay between $40 and $50 a month for unlimited bandwidth. A user can consume around 5GB by downloading just one high-def movie.

Critics of the new pricing plan cheered Time Warner's decision, but also warned that similar proposals might emerge in the future.

"It's a great victory for the grassroots and the netroots," said Rep. Eric Massa (D-N.Y.). "We are going to maintain our vigilance and maintain our position and move forward to make sure that no monopoly can dictate access to the Internet."

The freshman Congress member said last week that he intended to introduce the Massa Broadband Internet Fairness Act. Massa said Thursday that he still intends to press for legislation to rein in Time Warner, but might take a "strategic pause" to consult with other lawmakers rather than introduce a bill immediately.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday that he spoken with Time Warner's Britt about the opposition to the new pricing plan. Schumer also said in a statement that he intends to work with Time Warner Cable "to make sure that any future changes in Internet pricing are in line with what the community wants and needs."

In Rochester, Phillip Dampier, who founded the site Stopthecap.com, called Time Warner's retreat a "temporary victory."

"We have no illusions whatsoever. The Time Warner statement makes it clear that they think their only mistake here was that they didn't educate people enough," he said. "There's no education here that they need to do. It's very simple: Consumers here don't want caps."

Stopthecap.com has received 35,000 visitors in the two weeks since Time Warner said it would test the new pricing in the city, Dampier said. Prior to April 1, the site drew around 300 visitors a day.

Broadband advocacy group Free Press said Thursday that more than 15,000 members had written to Congress to oppose Time Warner's plan.

Before suspending its plan, Time Warner had argued that the new tiered pricing was the fairest way to deal with increased demands on its system. The company said that consumption among high-speed Internet subscribers was increasing by about 40% a year. But critics argued that the plan was aimed at discouraging people from watching online video for free rather than via pricey cable subscriptions.

Next story loading loading..