Verizon and Alltel Pay Up For 'Free' Ads
The settlement marks the latest chapter in Attorney General Bill McCollum's longstanding investigation into Web ads that promise free mobile content, but actually are for paid subscription services. McCollum has previously settled with other players in the mobile content market, including AT&T and AzoogleAds.
The authorities have alleged that consumers were tricked into providing their cell numbers in exchange for supposedly free ringtones or other content, and were then billed monthly fees for subscription services.
The Verizon deal, termed an "assurance of voluntary compliance," deal calls on Verizon to pay $1 million and Alltel to pay $500,000. (Verizon purchased Alltel last year, but the settlement addresses the companies separately.) The telecom also will offer rebates to consumers. Press reports say that those rebates could come to $30 million ($24 million for Verizon and $6 million for Alltel), but a Verizon spokesman said those numbers "have absolutely no basis in reality."
In addition, Verizon agreed to require third-party advertisers to prominently disclose the costs of ringtones, horoscopes, wallpaper and other mobile content. A Verizon spokesperson said the company already takes such steps. "Our agreement with the Florida AG reflects business changes we have made over the past few years to ensure that third-party content is marketed, advertised and billed accurately to consumers," he said.
0 comments on "Verizon and Alltel Pay Up For 'Free' Ads".
Leave a Comment
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
Weather.com Develops Real-Time Data Ad Targeting May 17, 5:12 p.m.
Weather.com has begun using audience segmentation data from Lotame to develop real-time ad targeting services based ... -
MetroPCS Drops Challenge To Neutrality Rules May 17, 4:44 p.m.
T-Mobile's newly acquired MetroPCS withdrew its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules on ... -
'Geo-Conquesting' Drives Higher Mobile Click Rates May 17, 3:56 p.m.
The practice of conquesting -- running advertising for a brand or product near editorial content about ... -
Cox-Backed, Skyword Raises $6.7 Million To Enhance Content Creation May 17, 3:34 p.m.
Internet services and utilities will rely more on content as the industry matures. Shereta Williams, vice ... -
Ford, Jeep, Chevy Top Digital Auto Brands May 17, 1:09 p.m.
On the digital proving track, Detroit is beating out the competition. Ford, Jeep and Chevrolet were ... -
Choosing Sides: VivaKi Backs comScore; ABC Throws In With Nielsen May 17, 9:52 a.m.
In a battle to control the future of the ad industry’s currency, Nielsen and comScore each ... -
Yahoo Adds Tweets To News Feed May 16, 6:18 p.m.
Yahoo will incorporate selected tweets into the news feed on its redesigned home page through a ... -
Mozilla Puts Cookie-Blocking On Hold May 16, 6:16 p.m.
Mozilla is putting the brakes on plans to block third-party cookies by default in the upcoming ... -
Mobile Ad Results In Line With Rich Media May 16, 5:39 p.m.
Mobile display ads perform roughly on par with rich media ads in terms of click-through and ... -
Google Plans To Transition Brands Into Content-Driven Advertising May 16, 4:30 p.m.
Google wants technology to "step out of the way" as developers integrate it into everyday life. ...


I wonder how many people either will not know that they should claim, or will not bother to claim back the hidden charges. This is a prime example why I will not sign a contract with a cell carrier. It really seems sometimes as if the descriptions of charges are intentionally indiscernible. So it’s easy to see how this could happen to literally thousands of people. And I'm sure Verizon is not the only company involved in this kind of scheme.
I prefer to use prepaid phones where I pay for what I use, with no hidden charges added. For instance: my Straight Talk plan will give me 1000 minutes, 1000 texts and 30mb data for $30. Not $35-$40 after all the added hidden charges! And with prepaid phone options now often cheaper than contracts there really is no reason to sign on the dotted line anymore.