Viral Fireworks: Beautiful, But Not Worth It
On this July 4th, during the worst economic climate in decades, city event planners around the country asked themselves if they were ready to spend money on large fireworks displays. Many cities were not, and canceled long-standing traditions. We occupy the same economic climate as those city event planners, and it's about time we started asking the same questions about whether our viral campaigns provide enough bang for the buck.
In a recent chat with digital thought leader John Rabasa, he mentioned a term that I love: viral fireworks. This means campaigns where the creative is viral, but the message has nothing to do with the value proposition of the product or service. You get meteoric growth, followed by an entertaining flash and then... nothing.
As long as you can keep the pace up, you can maintain the audience's rapt attention, but, like fireworks, as soon as the last entertaining flash has faded, you've captured very little of your audience's attention. Folks will remember the experience fondly, and may even attribute positive sentiment to your brand because of it, but they won't learn anything about what you're marketing. And that's assuming all of your campaigns work the way you expect them to -- just look at Cadbury to know how hard that is.
By using viral video to subtly communicate the core value proposition, you can change people's memories from just a fond experience to remembering the core value of your product.
Let's look at an example:
The recent campaign for LG Decoy featured a little person in a blue shirt who surprised Erik Estrada by jumping on his back; you can see the video here. It was then followed up with a video of the same little person, the hero of the campaign, sadly wondering down the street until he finds his match, an exact replica of himself, only bigger -- he hops on his double's back and they live happily ever after. We then learn that the campaign was for the LG Decoy, the first phone to ever have a built-in Bluetooth headset that you can disconnect from the phone to use.
The video was still entertaining, and didn't beat the message into your head, but subtly, almost in its DNA, the video was able to share with you the product's best feature -- and those viewers will remember that fondly. Contrast that to most viral spots and you'll see why it pays to invest the extra effort in your content. Effective storytelling, after all, is what marketing is all about.
0 comments on "Viral Fireworks: Beautiful, But Not Worth It".
Leave a Comment
Recent Video Insider Articles
-
Video Drives Up To 35% Sales Bump For CPG Brands May 23, 3:47 p.m.
The age-old question about advertising is which half is working, but the more important one may ...
-
The NewFronts Bring A New Day -- What's Next? May 21, 10:53 p.m.
At the end of every NewFront week, our industry asks the same question: Has digital video ...
-
Online Advertising: The Era Of Lowered Expectations May 21, 1:01 p.m.
Eric Schmidt dubbed advertising the last bastion of unaccountability in corporate America, and judging by the ...
-
Three Lessons Digital Video Advertisers Should Learn from Direct Marketing May 20, 6:13 p.m.
As a consumer, I often see pre-roll ads on my phone, Roku, Wii, tablet and PC. ...
-
Once Again: Are You STILL Making These Fatal Video Content Mistakes? May 17, 11:10 a.m.
No one plans to make bad marketing videos. Yet, the majority of them ARE bad. And ...
-
Cable and Broadcast in TV Everywhere's Bed; In-Stream Engagement Strong May 16, 10:10 a.m.
Perhaps the most important story to emerge from the TV upfronts isn’t the next hot hour-long ...
-
What If Yahoo Bought TV Guide? May 15, 9:50 a.m.
I may be dating myself here, but I still remember when families sifted through the print ...
-
Mister Rogers: No Tattoos, But Wisdom To Spare May 14, 12:53 p.m.
Ten years after his death in 2003, Fred Rogers -- aka Mister Rogers -- is back ...
-
Content Is Consuming Us: If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em May 13, 12:53 p.m.
Two years ago, the inventor of the Web browser Marc Andreessen commented that software is eating ...
-
People Are People Are People: The Future Of Video May 10, 10:44 a.m.
“I think I just passed by Sarah Jessica Parker, and btw I’m much taller than her,” ...

Willis, 22, is director of marketing for Involver, a technology company that helps brands distribute, track and optimize video campaigns on social networks. Willis writes about virality, engagement and monetization at http://blog.involver.com and is @tylerwillis on twitter. He can be reached directly at tyler@involver.com.
Great insight Tyler...good stuff!
Excellent points, I see it all around me. Goes back to the disconnect between creatives and the results the client is trying to achieve. Very impressive observations (and from a 22-year-old).