Judge OKs Class-Action Suit For AT&T Broadband Slowdown
The consumers alleged that the telecom promised "lightning fast" speeds of at least 384 kbps and up to 1.5 Mpbs, but delivered far slower connections due to "purposeful limitation or 'capping' of the lines," "the inadequacy of the lines," and "the poor condition of the lines."
AT&T allegedly "intentionally capped access to newsgroups and email for all of their customers," the lawsuit alleges. The consumers also alleged that attempts to remedy the situation by changing providers were met with hefty termination fees.
The judge in the case, Judge Gary M. Gaertner, recently ruled that the case could proceed as a class-action. "There is evidence in the record supporting the claims of (the consumers)," he wrote. "Defendants concede there were DSL customers who were capped."
That decision is critical because individual consumers who wanted to sue almost certainly would have found the cost of litigation prohibitively expensive. AT&T reportedly is planning to appeal.
Of course, the allegations in this one lawsuit concern just one small piece of the overall broadband picture -- a picture that remains fairly unimpressive in the U.S., according to a new report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The U.S. ranks 15th for broadband penetration among the 30 countries surveyed by the OECD, with rates hovering at around 27% as of June. Countries to rank higher include Denmark (37%), Korea (33%), and Canada (30%).
0 comments on "Judge OKs Class-Action Suit For AT&T Broadband Slowdown".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
NSA News Drives Consumers To Seek More Privacy Protection June 19, 5:30 p.m.
If nothing else, news about the National Security Agency's extensive surveillance activities seems to have left ...
-
BuzzFeed Slideshow Leads To Copyright Lawsuit June 18, 7:31 p.m.
BuzzFeed has been hit with a copyright infringement complaint that could have a significant impact on ...
-
Can Ad Networks And Advocates Close The Gap On Do-Not-Track? June 17, 7:54 p.m.
Will the World Wide Web Consortium's effort to forge online privacy standards come to naught? Some ...
-
Analyst: NSA Surveillance Will Raise Awareness About Big Data June 14, 6:18 p.m.
The National Security Agency's data collection from Web companies remains top of mind for analysts and ...
-
Ad Group Warns Of Possible Backlash From NSA Surveillance June 13, 6:42 p.m.
For almost one week now, the ad industry has been digesting the revelations that the National ...
-
Cable Companies Try To Prevent New Platforms From Gaining Foothold June 12, 6:45 p.m.
Cable companies and telecoms apparently are so spooked by the prospect of cord-cutting that they're now ...
-
Mozilla, Other Web Companies Lobby To Rein In NSA June 11, 6:50 p.m.
Search engine Duck Duck Go, browser developer Mozilla and social news site Reddit are among dozens ...
-
Will NSA Revelations Bring Added Privacy Pressure To Ad Biz? June 10, 5:57 p.m.
The recent revelations that tech companies are sharing information about users with the National Security Agency ...
-
Universities Garner Support In Battle Against Authors Guild June 7, 5:26 p.m.
A broad array of outside organizations is aligning themselves against the Authors Guild in its lawsuit ...
-
FCC Poised To Vote On Wireless Privacy Protections June 6, 6:38 p.m.
The Federal Communications Commission will vote at the end of this month about whether to issue ...
There's a delicious irony that AT&T have just spent millions in a peevish response to Verizon's "there's a map for that" ads - which suggested that AT&T's 3G coverage was less than stellar - and now they get slapped with a lawsuit regarding their poor service!
I wonder if Luke Wilson has ever tasted crow because somebody at AT&T may be eating it along with a slice of Umble pie ;)