Google Faces New Antitrust Complaints
The company argues that this move resulted in the cost of its search ads rising by as much as 10,000% -- a prohibitive increase that forced myTriggers to stop purchasing pay-per-click ads from Google.
MyTriggers additionally alleged that, last December, its placement in Google's organic results plunged for no good reason.
Lawyers at the firm representing myTriggers in the case -- Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft -- have represented Microsoft in antitrust matters. Those lawyers also are representing another search marketer, TradeComet, which filed an antitrust case against Google last year.
Now it's come to light that three other companies -- Foundem (a U.K. price comparison site as well as a member of the Microsoft-funded Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace), the French legal search engine ejustice.fr, and Microsoft's Ciao! from Bing -- have asked the European authorities to investigate whether Google violated antitrust law by lowering their position in the organic results.
One of those companies, Foundem, raised a similar issue with the Federal Communications Commission. In a filing about net neutrality, Foundem complained that Google "gives preferential placement to its own Map, News, YouTube, Book, and Product Search services" -- apparently violating a concept that some anti-Google entities have dubbed "search neutrality."
This afternoon, the nonprofit Consumer Watchdog piled on. Consumer Watchdog called for the Department of Justice to investigate whether Google "is manipulating" search results by returning its own sites high in the search results.
Julia Holtz, Google's senior competition counsel, said in a blog post that the company isn't intentionally targeting rivals. "Though each case raises slightly different issues," she wrote of the three European companies who complained, "the question they ultimately pose is whether Google is doing anything to choke off competition or hurt our users and partners. This is not the case."
Whatever Google's motives, its moves clearly have angered some search marketers who have seen their prices rise, or organic rankings fall, and don't understand why. While these complaints seem to have picked up momentum in recent weeks, they're nothing new for the search giant. As far back as 2006, the company KinderStart unsuccessfully sued Google after it stopped showing KinderStart's site in the results. Not only did a federal district court judge in California toss the case, but the judge ordered KinderStart's attorney to pay $7,500 in sanctions for having brought the action.
Of course, much has changed for Google in the last four years -- especially the DOJ's view of the company's market position. In late 2008, the DOJ forced Google to back out of a deal to power search results on Yahoo on the theory that the agreement would further extend Google's dominance in search.
The assessment of DOJ lawyers certainly doesn't carry the same weight as would a judicial ruling against Google. At the same time, now that the Justice Department has gone on record with concerns about the company, courts and other regulators might not be quite as fast to dismiss complaints as in the past.
0 comments on "Google Faces New Antitrust Complaints".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
NSA News Drives Consumers To Seek More Privacy Protection June 19, 5:30 p.m.
If nothing else, news about the National Security Agency's extensive surveillance activities seems to have left ...
-
BuzzFeed Slideshow Leads To Copyright Lawsuit June 18, 7:31 p.m.
BuzzFeed has been hit with a copyright infringement complaint that could have a significant impact on ...
-
Can Ad Networks And Advocates Close The Gap On Do-Not-Track? June 17, 7:54 p.m.
Will the World Wide Web Consortium's effort to forge online privacy standards come to naught? Some ...
-
Analyst: NSA Surveillance Will Raise Awareness About Big Data June 14, 6:18 p.m.
The National Security Agency's data collection from Web companies remains top of mind for analysts and ...
-
Ad Group Warns Of Possible Backlash From NSA Surveillance June 13, 6:42 p.m.
For almost one week now, the ad industry has been digesting the revelations that the National ...
-
Cable Companies Try To Prevent New Platforms From Gaining Foothold June 12, 6:45 p.m.
Cable companies and telecoms apparently are so spooked by the prospect of cord-cutting that they're now ...
-
Mozilla, Other Web Companies Lobby To Rein In NSA June 11, 6:50 p.m.
Search engine Duck Duck Go, browser developer Mozilla and social news site Reddit are among dozens ...
-
Will NSA Revelations Bring Added Privacy Pressure To Ad Biz? June 10, 5:57 p.m.
The recent revelations that tech companies are sharing information about users with the National Security Agency ...
-
Universities Garner Support In Battle Against Authors Guild June 7, 5:26 p.m.
A broad array of outside organizations is aligning themselves against the Authors Guild in its lawsuit ...
-
FCC Poised To Vote On Wireless Privacy Protections June 6, 6:38 p.m.
The Federal Communications Commission will vote at the end of this month about whether to issue ...


I had considered purchasing PPC ads and did a short-term analysis of the results. Then I set up Adsense patches and waited a year before I took them down again. During that time I did not earn a single penny, not because my site was not navigable (Urchin gave me a good performance rating), but because people simply don't click on the ads. For Google to suddenly elevate the cost per click of an ad is a bad move for Google, and anyone wanting to maximize their presence on the net can choose among thousands of other directories. The purpose of the ads is to drive viewers to the site, but unless you have something everyone wants to buy, PPC is a great way to throw money down the drain.