Once Again, Court Backs Gripe Sites
In a ruling quietly issued late last week, U.S. District Court Judge Robert Cleland in the eastern district of Michigan dismissed a lawsuit brought by a consortium of recruiters called Career Agents Network against the operator of two critical sites.
Career Agents Network alleged that the sites -- careeragentsnetworkbiz.com and careeragentnetworksbiz.com -- created by the businessman Lawrence White, violated its trademark and a federal cybersquatting law by incorporating its name into the domain names. The sites themselves warned people off Career Agents Network: "If you are considering investing in this 'opportunity', be aware that it is highly improbable that you will earn enough to cover your investment. If you proceed with this company you have been warned by those that know and have lost $20,000-$150,000 by trusting them and their 'plan,'" read the copy on the sites.
White created the sites after a falling out with Career Agents Network, according to Cleland's written decision. He also took the unusual step of using a search engine optimizer to drive traffic to the sites, Cleland wrote.
Still, the sites were themselves noncommercial and, therefore, didn't infringe on copyright or violate the cybersquatting law, Cleland ruled. "There is no evidence that defendants [White and a marketing company in which he was the majority shareholder] used these 'gripe' websites for commercial gain to themselves," he wrote in an opinion dismissing Career Agents Network's lawsuit.
With the decision, Career Agents Network joins a roster of businesses ranging from Walmart to Goldman Sachs to have unsuccessfully attempted to shut down gripe sites.
Obviously, some image-conscious companies don't always like the things they see online. But as courts have repeatedly ruled, that doesn't mean the companies are entitled to stop the conversation.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


Be the first to comment on "Once Again, Court Backs Gripe Sites"
Leave a Comment