TV Indecency -- Fleeting or Always?
No doubt TV advertisers would say this is all indecent -- taking us back to the wild and woolly 1990s TV advertising markets. Let's find more rude stuff to complain about.
0 comments on "TV Indecency -- Fleeting or Always?".
Leave a Comment
Recent TV Watch Articles
-
CBS Falling Back To TV's Promo Future June 18, 4:17 p.m.
It’s back to old-school marketing for CBS: Virtually all its fall shows will premiere in a ...
-
Does TV Need One Big Show That Pulls In All Viewers? June 17, 4:21 p.m.
More than last season, this was the year Fox’s “American Idol” came down off its high ...
-
Fighting Executives Continue To Rage Against Bigger Media Companies June 14, 5:26 p.m.
It seems that small and mid-size cable network executives will always be at war with powerful ...
-
A Different Sort Of Prediction: More Live Viewing, And Perhaps Less Time-Shifting June 13, 4:59 p.m.
More than other digital platforms, Twitter has been compared to “live” TV -- or real-time media. ...
-
TV In The Clouds: Where's The Sunshine? June 12, 2:50 p.m.
Some executives can see TV’s future perfectly -- through the clouds. That's the point. Content owners ...
-
TV A La Carte -- From The Start June 11, 3:56 p.m.
Perhaps Intel has the right approach to revolutionizing the way we buy our traditional TV service ...
-
Broadcast Upfront So Far: Looking For Even-Steven June 10, 1:36 p.m.
Surviving tough times for many in the broadcast upfront business means maintaining an even keel. So ...
-
Cigarette Ads Back On TV? Not Quite June 7, 3:27 p.m.
Bans on TV advertising for specific products don't slow down technology. TV ads for tobacco-laden cigarettes, ...
-
Sex And Violence Are Still TV Issues -- And So Is Research About Them June 6, 1:38 p.m.
The arguments connecting media violence or suggestive sexual content to real-life actions never seem to end. ...
-
Attacking On-Air Talent With A Commercial Could Mean New Drama For TV News Marketing June 5, 4:52 p.m.
Seems you can't buy a TV commercial on a network that attacks the network. Shocking, huh? ...

Wayne Friedman is West Coast Editor of MediaPost.
Any idea how next year's lockout will affect longer term projections?
Since you mentioned it: The ripping off of a woman's clothing to expose, even to mimic exposing, is a violent act, not sexual. This is a criminal act and should still be held as such. No matter what the director or anyone else tells the entertainers to do, it was their decision whether to act upon it. Ultimately, Justin Timberlake should be held responsible for attempted rape. The others held as conspirators. That would be a better message to send that a measley fine.
Great satire. Especially Paula's characterization of radical feminist ideology gone wild. Yes, let's arrest Justin Timberlake and put him on the sex offender list.