Report: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Owner Taps Righthaven For Copyright Enforcement
Since launching in March, Righthaven has sued more than 100 bloggers, small publishers and nonprofits for allegedly reposting articles from newspapers in the Stephens Media chain, including its flagship paper, the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The company, called a "copyright thugster" by University of North Dakota law professor Eric Johnson, has drawn criticism for running into court against individual bloggers rather than asking them to take down the content. While the law doesn't require newspapers to send cease-and-desist letters before suing, most publishers seem to think that suing readers as a first resort isn't the best course of action.
Around 20 cases have been settled, according to the Las Vegas Sun, which has been tracking the cases. Most settlements were confidential, but the two that were public ranged from around $2,000-$5,000.
Righthaven doesn't appear to have yet filed any cases alleging infringement of articles from the WEHCO chain -- though it's probably only a matter of time before that happens.
Meanwhile, the company appears to be facing some judicial pushback. U.S. District Court Judge Robert Johnston inquired about whether he could find that 57-year-old unemployed blogger Allegra Wong -- who allegedly reposted an article in her non-commercial blog devoted to cats -- was an innocent infringer. The copyright law generally says that copyright infringers are liable for a minimum of $750, but allows innocent infringers to pay damages of only $200.
The law surrounding innocent infringers is the subject of debate, but two federal circuit courts recently ruled that peer-to-peer users who share files can't be considered innocent when a copyright notice was affixed to a CD, even if they never saw the hard copy. One of those defendants is now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review that decision.
Still, even if a judge doesn't deem Wong an innocent infringer, the court has the power to order only $750 in damages. If Righthaven prevails, it's entitled to ask for its attorneys' fees and court costs, but judges have discretion about such awards. All in all, the end result could be that these lawsuits aren't as profitable as Righthaven clearly hopes.
0 comments on "Report: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Owner Taps Righthaven For Copyright Enforcement".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...
-
FTC Rejects Request To Delay New Children's Privacy Rules May 6, 7:43 p.m.
The Federal Trade Commission has unanimously turned down a request by industry groups to push back ...


This has nothing to do with fairness, copyrights, justice or any such ideals. A few people found a lovely little formula to squeeze 10's of millions of dollars out of individuals and publications. Really, who benefits?