Google Rightly Refuses To Give Up User Data
Consider, the company is facing a potential class-action lawsuit, an investigation by the Federal Communications Commission, potential questioning by Congress, and a multi-state probe led by Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. The incident also is in the running for most important privacy development of the year in a poll by the Center for Democracy & Technology.
Of all of the various probes, Blumenthal's seems to have created the biggest headache. That's because the outgoing Attorney General is asking Google to turn over the data it intercepted -- including, potentially, data that users would prefer to keep private, like the URLs they visited or their email transmissions.
So far, Google has refused to comply with Blumenthal's request. The company hasn't said why, but one possibility is that Google is afraid that cooperating with law enforcement here could further violate the privacy of WiFi users by turning over their emails and other communications to the government.
And there's no real question that disclosing people's emails to a state attorney general would compromise users' privacy. Consider, just last week the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in another context that law enforcement authorities aren't allowed to obtain people's emails without a search warrant.
Blumenthal told Politico that he wasn't requesting "names or addresses." Nonetheless, people can be identified even based on anonymized data.
Yes, maybe there's a chance that Google can provide enough information to Blumenthal for him to investigate while also protecting the privacy of users whose data was intercepted. But if there's even a possibility that complying with the subpoena will result in revelations about the contents of private emails, or of the URLs people visited, Google is right to refuse.
0 comments on "Google Rightly Refuses To Give Up User Data".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...


The senator truely does not understand. An excellent communicator needs to explain the details with respect. No doubt, there are many people at MediaPost who have this unique ability. Google should not be allowed to ascertain the information they did and the government should not be allowed to continue to do it. This is not about the government, via subpeana, to be able to obtain certain information at certain times on certain individuals for lack of a better term, crime fighting.