Privacy Advocates Have Issues With AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
Some advocates immediately suggested that the Federal Communications Commission should require AT&T to adhere to neutrality principles as a condition of the merger. That term seems logical, given that a merger would leave AT&T/T-Mobile subscribers with fewer alternatives than before should the network decide to start blocking traffic. At least one commissioner, Michael Copps, seems to agree; he recently said that neutrality conditions would be "important" to the deal.
But the concerns about the merger aren't limited to pricing or neutrality. Some privacy advocates have also raised questions about the deal. Privacy researcher Chris Soghoian called T-Mobile "the most privacy preserving of the major wireless carriers," noting that the company doesn't keep IP addresses of its mobile users. "In comparison, Verizon, AT&T and Sprint all keep logs regarding the IP addresses they issue to their customers, and in some cases, even the individual URLs of the pages viewed from handsets," he wrote on his blog.
Soghoian favors blocking the merger altogether. But, he said on his blog, if the deal goes through, "the FTC should at least extract strict privacy guarantees from AT&T that include a policy of not retaining IP address allocation or other Internet browsing logs."
Now, Jeff Chester, executive director of the privacy advocacy organization Center for Digital Democracy, is also urging regulators to examine AT&T's data collection practices when evaluating the planned acquisition.
His organization plans to call on the FCC and FTC to specifically address the privacy concerns posed by the merger. "As more Americans rely on their cell phones to conduct their personal and business affairs, it is critical that any merger of this significance trigger serious scrutiny on how it impacts both their privacy and consumer welfare," he writes in a letter slated to be sent to the FCC and FTC on Monday. "AT&T will have even more small and large business and consumer data available to use for its mobile advertising business after it acquires T-Mobile."
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


Be the first to comment on "Privacy Advocates Have Issues With AT&T/T-Mobile Merger"
Leave a Comment