Retrevo: Retailers Need To Get Their Apps Together

Mobile-PaypalYou can try to wish them away and reminisce about the days when people shopped and purchased in physical stores. But shopping apps for mobile devices aren't going away, and retailers have two choices when it comes to savvy shoppers with smartphones in their holsters: use 'em or lose 'em. Use the apps and mobile devices, that is -- or lose the consumers who view them as necessary shopping equipment for getting live reviews, price quotes and competitive deals.

Chains like Best Buy, Walmart and Target are up against it in this regard, according to consumer-electronics shopping and review site Retrevo.com. The site says that while shoppers have installed retailers’ apps, few have actually used it to help them buy something.

October data from Retrevo's ongoing Retrevo Pulse Report found that 43% of smartphone owners have installed a retailer's app on their mobile device, but only 14% of them have used that app to help them buy something in the store. Also, 78% of smartphone owners have checked out a product in-store, but then bought it from another online store, benefiting companies like Amazon at the expense of brick-and-mortar operations.

The demand is certainly there. When Retrevo.com asked study respondents if they had ever used a mobile device in a store to help them make a purchase, over half of smartphone owners said yes. Forty-two percent of them said they have used a mobile device in-store to check prices, and about 30% said they used the devices to read a review or look up specs while in stores, and a quarter have used a mobile device in-store to get a coupon. Clearly, retailers' apps are a link, but they appear to be the still-missing link.

Consumer electronics retailers apparently have the most to lose by not figuring out how to exploit the mobile Web and apps to expedite purchases in their stores versus losing consumers to online sellers or other retailers with lower prices. Retrevo's study found that 58% of smartphone owners have checked out electronics in a store, but then bought elsewhere online. The second-most-transient consumers are looking at shoes, with 41% of smartphone owners who shop footwear opting to buy online (nice work Zappos.)

After shoes comes the rest of the apparel arena, with 39% of smartphone owners using stores as clothes hangers and then buying elsewhere online. Then comes appliances, sporting gear and the home and garden category, where 19% of smartphone owners have gone online to close the deal through a Web seller after trudging the home and garden aisles.

A hint at what retailers could offer that might stem the tide is implied in the Retrevo.com stat that 53% of consumer electronics shoppers say they have gone into a store to buy electronics, but couldn't decide what to buy. Thirty percent of survey respondents said this happened because they did not have the information they needed (online prices, reviews, specs, etc.), followed by feeling overwhelmed by the number of choices.

And they also felt the salesperson was of little help.

Said Manish Rathi, Retrevo.com's co-founder and VP of marketing: "In today's market, where many brick-and-mortar retailers are trying to stay competitive, retailers can't afford to merely serve as a showroom for Amazon."

The firm says that as more consumers become smartphone owners, retailers will have to figure out how to exploit smartphones. Rathi says retailers have to focus on creating better, more informative mobile apps. 

Recommend (1) Print RSS
1 comment about "Retrevo: Retailers Need To Get Their Apps Together ".
  1. Richard Dysinger from ePrize , October 25, 2011 at 9:27 a.m.
    I have felt for awhile that the challenge of Mobile at Retail has less to do with the technology and more to do with the business model. . . The basic dilemma is that in the world of brick and mortar ownership of the consumer was pretty cut and dry. Outside the store they belong to the brand inside the store they belong to the retailer. Mobile completely upsets that apple cart and retailers have responded by trying to virtually stake out their brick and mortar space with an exclusive retail app. The sad fact is that for most retailers the average consumer is not an adherent to a retail brand and therefore sees little benefit in a retail branded app. The adoption numbers are bad and the usage numbers are even worse. What the consumer wants and or needs is an ecologically constructed app that allows the consumer to interact with the brand when he is off site and the retailer when he arrives at location. Technology exists in abundance to do that, but the level of agreement between the brands and the retailers is not there yet. Second retailers have to rethink what it is of value that they can provide at a retail location that is not provided virtually online or via mobile. . . They might take a cue from the Apple Store. . . The greatest retail app in the world is direct human interaction, centered around the customers needs, concerning the brands the customer is motivated to purchase.