Politics, Paterno and L'Affaire Romenesko Dominate News Business

Scandals of epic and not-so-epic proportions have fascinated the news business over the past couple of weeks.

The BIG ONE, of course rages on at Penn State, where an apparent leadership and moral vacuum has left the reputation of perhaps the most revered college football coach in the history of the game in tatters. Of course all the facts are not in yet, but if Joe Paterno did pass the buck and basically ignore the case of a one-time subordinate coach raping a child in the Penn State showers, well, that’s way beyond disgraceful. But apparently not illegal.

Then there’s the case of the presidential candidate, Herman Cain, whose past has come back to haunt him in the form of women who have stepped forward to accuse him of various forms of sexual harassment. His wife is standing by his side, suggesting that if there is one iota of truth to the allegations, the man must have a split personality.

That one is like déjà vu all over again. Anyone remember the famous 1992 interview that CBS’ 60 Minutes did with a certain presidential candidate denying allegations that he’d harassed a lady or two in his time? With his wife (now Madam Secretary) standing right beside him cheering him on? So who knows, if he can actually remember on stage why he wants to be president between now and next November, Mr. Cain just might grab the brass ring.

And then there’s L’Affaire Romenesko, the man who chronicled the highs and lows (and the in-betweens) of the news business for the Poynter Institute for about a dozen years. A man who has no love, or use for . . . quotation marks. Correct spellings of the institutions and authors whose stories he aggregated? Definitely. Links to said stories? When available. But quotes around verbatim passages in his rewrites of the stories he aggregated? Screw it.

Romenesko resigned—probably in disgust—after being called on the carpet in public by his boss, Julie Moos, for violating Poynter’s strict rules about applying quotation marks to every piece of verbatim copy lifted from aggregated stories.

Rules so strict in fact that no one at Poynter picked up on Romensko’s transgressions until an assistant editor at the Columbia Journalism Review detected the missing punctuation.

Is it me or is the public flogging that Romenesko received at the hands of the Poynter Institute WAY out proportion to his sin of omission? Granted, he violated the policy of the organization that was writing his paycheck. Never a smart thing to do. Still, it seems to me a “get with the program” warning would have been more appropriate, especially in light of that fact that Romenesko was attributing in ways that are standard for most digital aggregation sites--just not in the precise way the Poynter policy calls for.

Maybe Poynter was just plain embarrassed by the fact that it was another institution—the CJR no less—that uncovered the violations that led to the overreaction.

Maybe not. Apparently the facts in this case aren’t all in either. In an item on its The Kicker blog, posted Nov. 10, CJR said it would have more to say on the subject, “in the very near future.” Who knows, maybe they’ll come up with a missing link.

Tags: politics, sports, tv
Recommend (2) Print RSS
2 comments about "Politics, Paterno and L'Affaire Romenesko Dominate News Business".
  1. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited , November 17, 2011 at 6:53 p.m.
    The Paterno story will continue for at least a year if not more. It will all come out - how many in the football and sports programs and administration and the "charity" knew for a very long time. Their wives knew and kids were suspect. As more computers are stripped, more analysts in every field will prove they knew. This is a microcosm of power and control and money. Remember, besides the legal $100 million or more that football rolled in, there were so many more millions in gambling, secrets being paid off, favor trading and various other inside trading. If any kind of conspiracy (no doubt even now had shown itself) is proved, the feds could be filling many empty cells.
  2. Todd Brewster from Media Buying Decisions , November 22, 2011 at 12:48 a.m.
    The Sandusky incident is the fault of the Penn State administration people, even the board of directors, possibly the Governor of Pa along with the DA's office and State Police. However, as facts are revealed it will show little to do with PSU football and Joe Paterno. Your speculation that Joe passed the buck has no foundation and does not follow the pattern of a man of high integrity. Joe graduates his players and I have seen him lose games by taking out players to give them a lesson in life. A coach who sits out kids for under age drinking will not allow a kid to be molested. I am confident Joe did everything he could do. However, in hindsight, every honest man will feel he can do more.