Appeals Court Considers File-Sharer's Case
Attorneys for file-sharer Jammie Thomas-Rasset seemingly won a major victory against the Recording Industry Association of America in 2008, when U.S. District Court Michael Davis ruled that merely making tracks available on a peer-to-peer network didn't infringe copyright.
Instead, he ruled, the RIAA must prove that someone else downloaded the tracks that Thomas-Rasset uploaded. At the time, he vacated a jury's finding of liability and its decision that Thomas-Rasset should pay $220,000. He then ordered a new trial.
Unfortunately for Thomas-Rasset, that victory proved pyrrhic. Subsequent proceedings resulted in an award of $1.5 million.
The trial judge found the large award unconstitutional and reduced it to $54,000. Both sides appealed. Thomas-Rasset says that even $54,000 is too high, while the RIAA says that the $1.5 million award was constitutional.
The RIAA also says that the first verdict for $220,000 should never have been vacated. That's because the RIAA still wants a ruling on the books stating that merely making tracks available infringes copyright.
Ironically, Thomas-Rasset now also has no objection to a ruling stating that merely making tracks available infringes copyright, given that such a ruling will reinstate the $220,000 verdict -- which is better for Thomas-Rasset than the $1.5 million order.
"I think the court should grant the other side the relief they sought in their brief," Thomas-Rasset's lawyer told a panel of the 8th Circuit this week. He added that such a result would be "better for our individual client" -- even if it's also more helpful to the RIAA in the future.
An audio transcript of the hearing doesn't give too many clues as to what the court intends to do. But attorney Ray Beckerman, who posted a link to the recording, offered the prediction that the court will affirm Davis. If so, the $54,000 award will stand, as will the decision that merely making tracks available doesn't infringe copyright.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
NSA News Drives Consumers To Seek More Privacy Protection June 19, 5:30 p.m.
If nothing else, news about the National Security Agency's extensive surveillance activities seems to have left ...
-
BuzzFeed Slideshow Leads To Copyright Lawsuit June 18, 7:31 p.m.
BuzzFeed has been hit with a copyright infringement complaint that could have a significant impact on ...
-
Can Ad Networks And Advocates Close The Gap On Do-Not-Track? June 17, 7:54 p.m.
Will the World Wide Web Consortium's effort to forge online privacy standards come to naught? Some ...
-
Analyst: NSA Surveillance Will Raise Awareness About Big Data June 14, 6:18 p.m.
The National Security Agency's data collection from Web companies remains top of mind for analysts and ...
-
Ad Group Warns Of Possible Backlash From NSA Surveillance June 13, 6:42 p.m.
For almost one week now, the ad industry has been digesting the revelations that the National ...
-
Cable Companies Try To Prevent New Platforms From Gaining Foothold June 12, 6:45 p.m.
Cable companies and telecoms apparently are so spooked by the prospect of cord-cutting that they're now ...
-
Mozilla, Other Web Companies Lobby To Rein In NSA June 11, 6:50 p.m.
Search engine Duck Duck Go, browser developer Mozilla and social news site Reddit are among dozens ...
-
Will NSA Revelations Bring Added Privacy Pressure To Ad Biz? June 10, 5:57 p.m.
The recent revelations that tech companies are sharing information about users with the National Security Agency ...
-
Universities Garner Support In Battle Against Authors Guild June 7, 5:26 p.m.
A broad array of outside organizations is aligning themselves against the Authors Guild in its lawsuit ...
-
FCC Poised To Vote On Wireless Privacy Protections June 6, 6:38 p.m.
The Federal Communications Commission will vote at the end of this month about whether to issue ...
Be the first to comment on "Appeals Court Considers File-Sharer's Case"
Leave a Comment