WWW.MEDIAPOST.COM
Viral Isn't A Four-Letter Word
by Bryan Boettger, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:46 PM
But the word "plan" is. I'm officially over talking about a "plan" for viral social engagement. This could be my Jerry Maguire moment, so prepare for either a rant or a manifesto -- you tell me
which. Viral videos are either "lucky" or an act of "faith" -- fittingly, both five-letter words just like "viral." The reason I hate the words "viral" and "plan" put together is that
they usually connote an expectation of cheap costs, no advertising support and wildly successful sharing. It's similar to the old creative adage: You can have cheap, fast or good, but only two at a
time. Here's my request. My plea. My call from the mountain top... Every time you are about to use the word "viral" in a request, replace it with the word "successful." Let's look at the
math:
- Cheap Costs + No Advertising Support = an act of faith. You're putting something out there, but you know it might not gain traction, and the small amount of money
you spent is a pure gamble you have to be willing to lose.
- Cheap Costs + Wildly Successful Sharing = something fueled by advertising support, so this makes it
“successful” and not “viral.” If it happens quickly inside your distribution network without advertising, that's not viral either, it's simply targeted communications.
If it happens slowly outside your distribution network, that's being patient, not viral.
- No Advertising Support + Wildly Successful Sharing = a budget to make
really amazing content. This certainly doesn’t guarantee it becoming viral, but it certainly ups your chances.
So, you see, I’m not against the idea of viral, I’m
against the current connotation of the word “viral.” I’m against expectations that something will be cheap, unsupported and have wildly successful sharing. Call something
viral
after the fact. NEVER say you
plan for something to go viral. Instead, say you are taking a viral gamble. And, like playing blackjack in Vegas, you can up your odds in
this gamble. I’ve written for Mediapost in the past about "
10 Factors of Viral
Propensity": Authentic, irreproducible, odd, funny, musical, surprising, impressive, parodied/copied, painful/embarrassing, and pop culture timeliness. But, while you can up your
odds by counting cards, you can’t guarantee a win. That’s why it’s called gambling. If you’re going to hold people accountable to success, then ask for a
“successful” video, not a “viral” video. Spell out the terms of that success. Otherwise, test a concept. Take a gamble. Let a creative have fun. Be quirky. Bond as a
team. All those 10 factors mentioned above have the propensity to go viral. Know that. Plan for that (once again, see the post linked above). But don’t set expectations for that.
For every Dollar Shave Club (cheap costs, minimal advertising support and wildly successful sharing), there’s also a Red Bull Sky Diver Breaking The Sound Barrier (wildly high costs, massive
advertising support, wildly successful sharing). For every Orabrush Tongue Man (cheap costs, minimal advertising support and wildly successful sharing), there’s an Old Spice Guy (high costs,
massive advertising support, massive sharing). Calling all four of those examples “viral” is simply confusing. If you want to be vague, by all means, ask for something to go
“viral.” But, if you want to be clear, accountable and actionable, don’t use the word “viral” until after the fact. What do you think? Rant or manifesto? Let me
know in the comments. Then, share this article with three people. I promised my boss it’d go viral.