Court Rules Against Best Buy In Robocall Lawsuit
In a defeat for Best Buy, a federal appeals court ruled this week that the company violated a telemarketing law by making robocalls that directed consumers to an ecommerce site.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Best Buy's argument that the calls were informational and therefore, shouldn't be considered advertising.
"These calls were aimed at
encouraging listeners to engage in future commercial transactions with Best Buy to purchase its goods," the court ruled. "They constituted unsolicited advertisements, telephone solicitations, and
telemarketing, and were prohibited."
The ruling reversed a decision in favor of Best Buy issued last year by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Jones in Seattle.
The case stems
from a series of robocalls made in 2008 and 2009 to Rainier, Wash., resident Michael Chesbro. He said that the calls -- which started shortly after he purchased a computer from Best Buy in 2008 --
advised him to visit the store's Web site in order to redeem his "Reward Zone" points.
Chesbro said he attempted to opt out of receiving calls and when that failed, complained to the
Washington Attorney General. When the calls continued, he filed a potential class-action lawsuit in federal court in Seattle, where he alleged that Best Buy violated the federal Telephone Consumer
Protection Act. That law bans companies from using automated dialing systems for marketing calls, without consumers' consent.
The trial judge ruled last September that Best Buy's robocalls
weren't covered by the federal statute, "because no property, good or service was advertised or even mentioned during the call."
But the appellate court disagreed. "We approach the problem
with a measure of common sense," the judges wrote. "The calls encouraged the listener to make future purchases at Best Buy. Neither the statute nor the regulations require an explicit mention of a
good, product, or service where the implication is clear from the context."
Best Buy declined to comment on the matter.
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
Network Advertising Initiative Proposes New Mobile Privacy Rules May 22, 9:03 p.m.
Moving forward with its plan to issue mobile privacy rules, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative ... -
Entertainment, Travel Bet On Mobile Banners May 22, 4:16 p.m.
Banner ads have long been the whipping boy of online advertising, and the same is now ... -
Marketers Should Tailor Specific Pitches To Tablet, Smartphone May 22, 2:51 p.m.
Don’t lump tablets in with mobile. That’s the takeaway of a new Forrester study looking at ... -
Good TV Content Trumps On, Whether Trad TV Or Streaming May 22, 2:42 p.m.
While consumers continue to perceive TV programming as superior in quality to that of online fare, ... -
Google Releases Self-Serve Display Benchmark Tool May 22, 2:02 p.m.
Understanding how a brand's online campaign competes with competitors requires trending benchmark data like engagement rates ... -
Twitter Brings Lead Generation To Tweets May 22, 1:14 p.m.
Twitter began testing a lead generation tool Wednesday in its tweet stream that resembles a cross ... -
DigitasLBi, Razorfish Tap Execs For Global Ops May 22, 11:26 a.m.
Publicis Groupe digital agencies DigitasLBi and Razorfish have installed new executives to run their respective international ... -
More Consumers Turn To Mobile To Research, Book Travel May 22, 8:53 a.m.
More than half of consumers used a mobile device to book travel in the last 90 ... -
Showrooming Overhyped, Mobile Key To Shopping Purchases May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Given consumers' mobile in-store shopping trends, some consider the showrooming hoopla overblown. The research process still ... -
Shopping App Swirl Adds In-Store Capability May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Swirl entered the mobile shopping fray last year with an iPhone app allowing users to learn ...
Be the first to comment on "Court Rules Against Best Buy In Robocall Lawsuit"
Leave a Comment