Instagram Restores Old Terms, Vows To Move Slower In Future
Instagram has decided to stick with its old terms of service after all. Co-founder Kevin Systrom blogged last night that the Facebook-owned company is reverting to its October 2010 terms, and has no plans at the time roll out any new ad products that would require a change.
He also wrote that in the future, the company will decide exactly what kinds of ad products it wants to offer before changing the terms of service. That way, Instagram's lawyers won't draft terms of service that give the company far more expansive rights than it actually needs for ad purposes.
Here's his exact language: "Going forward, rather than obtain permission from you to introduce possible advertising products we have not yet developed, we are going to take the time to complete our plans, and then come back to our users and explain how we would like for our advertising business to work."
For now, that shift probably will stem much of the recent criticism -- and, more importantly from Instagram's point of view, the threatened exodus. But long-term, the company still seems to have the ability to change many of its terms on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
Already, experts are warning people not to rely on services they use for free. "Every cloud service provider goes rogue on its users inevitably," Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman says in a blog post about the Instagram debacle. "Where the business' interests diverge from users, users are going to be thrown under the bus."
Of course, there are some limits. For instance, a company that offers one set of terms when people sign up for a service, but then changes those terms midstream, might be engaging in deceptive behavior. Consider, Facebook faced a Federal Trade Commission complaint for changing its privacy default settings in 2009 in a way that gave some users less privacy than when they signed up for the service.
But even beyond any potential legal ramifications, users have the ability to walk away when they don't like new terms of service. As Instagram learned this week, companies that rely on users for content shouldn't take them for granted.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...


Be the first to comment on "Instagram Restores Old Terms, Vows To Move Slower In Future"
Leave a Comment