Vanity Searcher Loses Lawsuit Against Google, Yahoo
Psychologist Carla Ison didn't like what she saw when she conducted vanity searches on Google and Yahoo.
Both search engines apparently returned ads and other links that Ison found troubling. Google allegedly associated the California-based psychologist's name with porn sites, as well as with "nonsensical" text and "practices considered unethical or very questionable." Yahoo allegedly returned a result showing a map of Ison's office location but wrongly indicating that she is a medical doctor.
In 2010, after finding herself unable to resolve the issues with Google and Yahoo informally, she sued both companies for trademark infringement. She indicates in her complaint that she took the matter to court because "members of her profession have an ethical obligation to ensure that information about them is presented truthfully in the media."
Now, three years after the case was filed, a judge in Santa Clara, Calif. has dismissed Ison's lawsuit. Judge Kevin McKenney granted summary judgment to Google and Yahoo last week, ruling that they are entitled to prevail because Ison couldn't prove that her name was entitled to trademark protection in her name. That's because she wasn't able to show that her name had any special associations to the public -- unlike, for instance, the company names "Holiday Inn" or "Vision Center."
Santa Clara University professor Eric Goldman, who reported the decision earlier today, points out that Ison isn't the only person to sue over how her name is used to trigger paid ads. A court in Wisconsin currently is considering whether people can bring privacy lawsuits when their names are used to trigger search ads.
In that case, personal injury lawyers at the firm Habush Habush & Rottier sued lawyers at the rival firm Cannon & Dunphy, for allegedly using the names "Habush" and "Rottier" to trigger search ads. That claim is based on a Wisconsin state law allowing suits for invasion of privacy if their name is used for commercial purposes without their permission.
A trial judge ruled against Habush and Rottier in 2011. They appealed and the Wisconsin Supreme Court is currently considering the matter.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...


1 comment on "Vanity Searcher Loses Lawsuit Against Google, Yahoo".
Leave a Comment