Paste
Eighth? Behind Brian Wilson, last seen wandering around the "Hollywood" sign in a muumuu and slippers? This is sacrilege. I acknowledge the unvarnished majesty of radio ditties like "I Get Around" and have read many, many times that "Pet Sounds" is a lush, glorious slice of California blah blah blah. But one guy remains as creatively vital now as he was at the start of his career in 1976; the other just got around to finishing a record he started in 1966. Can we take it easy on the lifetime-achievement awards? Please?
(To answer your question: Yes, of course I'd prefer writing about music to writing about magazines. Hiring? I need comprehensive dental and a generous short-pants allowance.)
Anyway, if the June/July Paste provoked one-seventeenth the reaction in most readers that it did in me, the mag's editors clearly did their job. The "100 Best Living Songwriters" compilation, the issue's centerpiece, does everything a super-listy cover feature should. It presents compelling arguments for each of its inclusions, a glut of lyric excerpts, a few sober nods to songwriters no longer with us (Jeff Buckley et al) and top-tens from tastemakers/music dorks like Cameron Crowe.
The list's supporting stories are slightly more hit-and-miss. The features on XTC's Andy Partridge and producer/songwriter/Elvis Costello's bestest buddy T Bone Burnett offer fresh insight into underrated performers, but the Dylan-music-as-a-soundtrack-to-some-dude's-life memoir rambles. Nonetheless, you can't argue with the overall comprehensiveness. If you take your tunes seriously or if you just need some fresh fodder for debate with your pals, leave Paste on your coffee table and let the sparring begin.
(Patty Griffin over Ray Davies? No Freedy Johnston? Shame on you.)
I'm not as sold on the rest of the issue. On its cover, Paste touts its search for "signs of life in music, film & culture." To mangle a lyric by Jim Steinman (happily left off the list), one out of three ain't bad. Paste's coverage of film and culture, while notable for its passion and occasional intellect, isn't in the same ballpark as its music content; I'd estimate the music/film/culture ratio at something like 70/20/10. Either go full-throttle with the film and culture, or ditch it altogether. An ostensibly high-thinkin' title like Paste shouldn't waste its time, or ours, flagging the release dates of "Click" and "Nacho Libre."
While travel columnist Hollis Gillespie adds welcome bite (her recounting of a trip to "fall-of-the-wall"-era Berlin begins, "It's generally not my policy to piss off drunk people--especially foreign-speaking drunk people surrounded by broken bottles and stolen bikes"), other featured writers in the June/July issue fall into the stodgy-old-person-yearning-for-the-good-ol'-days trap. The front-of-book "Scrapbook" features a whine-tastic essay on the use of music for commercial purposes; the exegesis on roller derby contains the same babble about "china-doll gladiators" that you've read 4,200 times before.
Then there's the "Before the Music Dies" feature, which lost me with its subhead ("Idealistic filmmakers take the mainstream-pop assembly line to task"). A suggestion: if you don't like Jessica Simpson's contributions to the cultural canon, simply ignore them. I'm sure she won't take it personally.
I'm similarly split on Paste's music, book and DVD reviews. On one hand, the level of thought that goes into them trumps anything you'll see in, say, Rolling Stone. On the other, the reviewers seem to have left their critical faculties at the door: of the 60-odd CDs evaluated in the June/July issue, around six are assigned fewer than three stars and none are treated to the type of rhetorical thrashing that Lester Bangs used to mete out with happy regularity (R.I.P, Creem). It's a tough world out there, kids. Things occasionally suck. Acknowledging this, in music reviews as in pre-trial motions, can be quite liberating.
Paste does more things right than it does wrong, and presents its content quite stylishly (though the dimly lit, detail-free photos of the Raconteurs hunched over their guitars might as well be some random kids in a suburban garage). But until the mag either bolsters or entirely eliminates its film and cultural coverage, it won't escape multi-genre purgatory. It's a case of what top-living-songwriter appointee Robby Z. might call "mixed-up confusion."
Recent Magazine Rack Articles
-
This Old House Aug. 24, 2 p.m.
I live in a Greenwich Village apartment. If you have one bedroom, you're considered fortunate; two ...
-
Popular Mechanics May 19, 2:45 p.m.
Usually, I only read magazines whose content appeals directly to me: ones with glossy spreads of ...
-
Cooking Light May 13, 2:15 p.m.
It's been quite a while since I gave Cooking Light short shrift in a 2006 review ...
-
Publishers Weekly March 30, 2:45 p.m.
I read regional pubs of places I refuse to visit; enjoy enthusiast mags on subjects I'd ...
-
Bloomberg Markets Dec. 29, 2:02 p.m.
There may be, to quote George Costanza, painful shrinkage in key sectors, but Bloomberg Markets is ...
-
Bloomberg Businessweek Dec. 17, 2:30 p.m.
It's been over a year since Bloomberg bought the venerable yet ailing Business Week, and since ...
-
Weight Watchers Nov. 12, 2:15 p.m.
Anna Wintour be damned. The September/October issue of Weight Watchers magazine features plus-sized models who look ...
-
Adirondack Life Oct. 27, 12:45 p.m.
Outdoor magazines always amaze me. Yes, nature is lovely to look at -- but what do ...
-
Guitar Aficionado Oct. 21, 2:50 p.m.
I was in a really cool guitar store in Brooklyn, Retro Fret, talking about guitars with ...
-
Essence Sept. 30, 1:30 p.m.
Should Essence, one of very few magazines exclusively for black women, have hired a white fashion ...


Be the first to comment on "Paste"
Leave a Comment