Comcast to FCC: Our Traffic Shaping Was Lawful
But that doesn't mean there's no suspense left. Digital rights advocates are worried that the ruling might be too narrow to serve as a ringing endorsement of net neutrality. And Comcast is still clearly hoping that whatever order comes down has little impact on the company's practices.
Comcast just this week sent the FCC a new 22-page letter, again arguing that it did nothing wrong in delaying some peer-to-peer traffic. "The overwhelming majority of the billions of P2P sessions that are effectuated daily over Comcast's network are not delayed. And, when a P2P upload is delayed, in the vast majority of cases, that delay lasts less than a minute. By no reasonable definition of the word can this reasonably be considered to be 'blocking,' " Comcast wrote.
Comcast's most recent missive was prompted by a filing last week by net neutrality advocate Free Press, which hopes to persuade the FCC to issue as sweeping a ruling as possible. "Free Press claims that Comcast's approach for managing such congestion is unreasonable simply because it allegedly deviates from Internet standards," Comcast wrote. "This erroneously suggests that there exists a comprehensive list of standards governing how the Internet operates. That is not the case."
Comcast also argues that its approach is content-neutral, if not protocol-neutral. "Comcast's approach is to manage only those protocols that negatively affect the network and its users; this is entirely content- and identity-neutral, and certainly not discriminatory," the company argues.
But the reality isn't that simple. There might not be a "comprehensive list of standards," but the FCC has been on record since 2005 as saying that consumers should have access to applications of their choice. Of course, there are still real questions about whether that statement is enforceable. The FCC clearly thinks it has the power to enforce its policies, but courts might disagree -- and this matter seems certain to end up in court, unless Comcast and the FCC can agree to settle the matter.
The FCC is expected to make a decision next month.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...


Be the first to comment on "Comcast to FCC: Our Traffic Shaping Was Lawful"
Leave a Comment