Law Firm's Case Against Blockshopper Allowed To Continue
A federal judge Thursday refused to dismiss a case brought by the law firm Jones Day against online publisher Blockshopper.com, accusing it of trademark infringement for having linked to the law firm.
But in a partial victory for the local real estate news company, the judge, John Darrah of Chicago, said that the lawsuit could only go forward against Blockshopper and not company principals Brian Timpone and Edward Weinhaus.
A written copy of Darrah's order was not available as of Thursday evening, so the reasons for his decision are not clear.
Jones Day brought the lawsuit in August, after Blockshopper published two articles about lawyers Jacob Tiedt and Dan Malone, Jr., who had recently purchased homes in the Chicago area. Those articles used the name "Jones Day" in the headlines and also linked to the associates' profiles on the firm's Web site.
Jones Day argued that these articles violated its trademark because they used the firm's name and linked to the site without authorization. The law firm asserted that the links might mislead people into thinking it was affiliated with the site.
Blockshopper asked for the case to be dismissed, arguing that there was no realistic possibility that consumers would confuse the real estate site with the law firm. The news company also argued that Web publishers don't need the permission of the people or companies they write about to mention their names or link to their Web sites.
"Fortunately for Blockshopper and other news media, Jones Day can no more stop the accurate news reports on www.blockshopper.com than it can stop articles in The Chicago Tribune, www.cnn.com, or any other print or electronic news source," Blockshopper's attorneys argued.
Jones Day had argued against dismissal, saying it was not appropriate at an early stage of the case because all of the facts had not yet come out.
The case drew the attention of digital rights groups including Public Citizen and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who attempted to file friend-of-the-court briefs. Darrah Thursday denied their motion to get involved in the case.
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
FTC's Ohlhausen Questions Privacy Recommendations May 21, 6:05 p.m.
The Federal Trade Commission's 2012 privacy recommendations could unintentionally disadvantage smaller online ad companies, Commissioner Maureen ... -
Subway's Comedy Promotes Brand, Content Strategy May 21, 2:43 p.m.
Setting a new bar for brands and their programming aspirations, Subway’s scripted comedy series, "The 4 ... -
Future of Social, Digital Shops In Doubt May 21, 1:48 p.m.
Companies talk a lot about fully integrated marketing strategies. One result may be the demise of ... -
Google+ Needs Android To Climb Out Of Experimental Phase May 20, 9:24 p.m.
Marketers continue to view Google+ as a fledgling network requiring experimentation, although the company released a ... -
AOL, Support.Com Settle Scareware Lawsuit For $8.5 Million May 20, 5:20 p.m.
Web company AOL and software vendor Support.com will pay $8.5 million to settle a lawsuit brought ... -
Gmail Hangouts Disable Google Voice May 20, 3:23 p.m.
Google's new version of Hangouts for Gmail eliminates Google Voice features. The move is frustrating heavy ... -
Digital Boost: Ziff Davis Acquires NetShelter May 20, 3:19 p.m.
Ziff Davis on Monday announced the acquisition of content network NetShelter from ad platform inPowered. Financial ... -
LikeableAds.com Launches, With Focus On Social Media Ads May 20, 3:04 p.m.
To keep up with growing demand from Madison Avenue, the social marketing consultants at Likeable Media ... -
Yahoo To Ramp 'Native' Ads On Tumblr May 20, 1:37 p.m.
With its $1.1 billion acquisition of Tumblr, Yahoo on Monday made clear that it plans to ... -
Gigya Improves Marketing, Adds 21 Social, Tech Partners May 20, 9:15 a.m.
Social services startup Gigya on Monday is expected to announce the addition of 21 social and ...
Be the first to comment on "Law Firm's Case Against Blockshopper Allowed To Continue"
Leave a Comment