Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 17 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL) Apr 27 Outfront Conference (NYC) May 12 OMMA Mobile (NYC) May 13 Digital Out-of-Home Awards (NYC) Jun 15 OMMA Video Jun 16 OMMA Publish (NYC) Jun 17 OMMA Social (NYC)
Recently Concluded Events
Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 25 OMMA Performance (SF) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 (NYC) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 Digital Out-of-Home Awards
2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year 2009 2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2009 2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Huh? Newspaper Columnist Calls For Copyrighting News
by Wendy Davis, Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 4:15 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES
TAGS:  Content Issues, Newspapers

MOST READ

Columnist Connie Schultz at the Cleveland Plain Dealer has added her voice to those calling for new laws that would prevent Web sites from summarizing news stories that originate elsewhere.

Schultz joins figures such as influential judge Richard Posner and newspaper industry lawyers Bruce Sanford and Bruce Brown in claiming that this massive rewrite of copyright law is necessary to "save" journalism.

All are proposing some form of new copyright laws to make it harder for publications to rewrite news scoops that first appear elsewhere. Schultz endorses a specific proposal to ban any publishers from summarizing others' reports for at least 24 hours.

Recommendations of this sort should frighten anyone who cares about a free press. But one would think that journalists would be especially suspicious of any proposals to give someone ownership -- even if temporary -- over information.

Certainly, it wouldn't serve readers' interests to prevent one publication from rewriting and/or linking to another's articles. If the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports on something of national importance, isn't it a good thing that readers in, say, New York, who might not think to visit the Plain Dealer Web site, are able to learn of that story via Google News? And if the Cleveland Plain Dealer honestly believes the answer to that question is no, the paper has the ability to keep its pages out of Google's results. Or it could refrain from putting them online altogether.

Schultz has special contempt for "aggregators" that, she claims, make newspapers redundant. "Parasitic aggregators reprint or rewrite newspaper stories, making the originator redundant and drawing ad revenue away from newspapers at rates the publishers can't match." she complains. "The inevitable consequence: diminished revenue and staff cuts."

That aggregators also send traffic -- and potential ad eyeballs -- back to news sites seems to have escaped her.

Besides, some former advertisers have stopped spending as much on newspapers for reasons having nothing to do with aggregators. Newspapers' classifieds revenue dropped from around $20 billion in 2000 to $10 billion last year as listings migrated to the free Craigslist -- a site that no one would accuse of aggregating news.

27 people recommend this article. 

11 comments on "Huh? Newspaper Columnist Calls For Copyrighting News"

  1. Rebecca Rachmany from AdsVantage
    commented on: July 02, 2009 at 3:08 AM
    This is almost as innovative as systematically slapping lawsuits on your customers. Maybe the RIAA will help push for this bill as well.

  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@verizon.net
    commented on: July 01, 2009 at 9:01 PM
    David H, Not only smart publishers in short supply, I doubt if they exist. They have been in CYA mode.

  3. Walter Pike from PiKE
    commented on: July 01, 2009 at 6:29 PM
    Some people just dont get it.

    Why should I pay you if I can get it for free. You just dont add value and maybe realise that when I buy a newspaper I am not buying a paper I am buying news, I really dont care where I get it.

    You can fight it as much as you like until you topple over into the tarpit of history.

  4. Harrison Cochran from Aurora Sentinel
    commented on: July 01, 2009 at 5:44 PM
    The rhetorical debate continues without much recognition of the disconnect between the value of news, which has nothing to do with the cost of producing it or it's "value to society," and the delivery of customer attention which was all that was being paid for by the advertiser on page, screen or airwaves.

  5. Dick Harrison from BrainPosse, Inc.
    commented on: July 01, 2009 at 8:22 AM
    The proposed change to the copyright law does not prohibit other news outlets from reporting on a story within 24 hours or initial publication. IF they do their own investigative reporting.

    The proposed change does prohibit aggregators from stealing the valuable property of organizations that paid the reporters, editors and videographers who developed the story originally.

    The concept that "content wants to be free" is absurd. If there's no compensation for content there won't be any content. Except, perhaps, inane YouTube postings of people's pets being comically cute. No doubt diverting if one's mind has turned to mush, but not much of a basis upon which to build the informed electorate that's essential to a functioning democracy.

    It seems unlikely that the provised revision will be enected. Because without it investigative reporting will wither away. And when it does the poltroons who populate our political system will be able to gorge at the trough of political corruption with no fear of being found out. And they're shrewd enough to figure that out.

  6. Rich Reader from WOMbuzz
    commented on: July 01, 2009 at 2:39 AM
    Copyrighting copywriting. Genius.

  7. David Hawthorne from HCI LearningWorks
    commented on: June 30, 2009 at 5:39 PM
    'You supply the pictures, and I'll supply the war,' was not the cry of the journalist, but of the publisher. Publishers have to evolve -again. How can you 'ad value' to the info you gather and organize? Thinks 'app-like'. Can I facilitate multiple perceptions and invidual viewpoints by tagging alternative data structures (fashion, chemistry, legislation, economic impact) to a that same photo/story? What additional info would I want vs. additional infor my wife, chile, friend, boss, would want? Would my customer pay me 25-cents, every time s/he wanta a 'photo/story' parsed for his own ideosyncratic perspective? Please, smart publishers must me in short supply!

  8. Mark Moran from findingDulcinea
    commented on: June 30, 2009 at 5:08 PM
    This column violates Connie Schultz' law. Go directly to jail, do not collect $200. When a newspaper breaks a story, anyone else has to summarize that story in order to build upon it or present a alternative viewpoint. The proposed law gives the source breaking the story a 24-hour monopoly on the story. This sounds like a pretty severe infringement on the First Amendment. What is needed is a tighter definition of Fair Use, greater penalties for violation of it, and a practical mechanism for copyright owners to pursue Fair Use claims and seize any advertising revenue generated from the guilty parties.

  9. Frank Russo from RoughWave Advisory Group
    commented on: June 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM
    The Free Press is not "free"; someone paid for the journalist to do his/her investigation and reporting. Perhaps a royalty system would work. If you were to use someone's song in a commercial application, you are supposed to pay royalties. Why not do the same for other kinds of content.

  10. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@verizon.net
    commented on: June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM
    She is a very limited person.

  11. Joshua Chasin from comScore
    commented on: June 30, 2009 at 4:34 PM
    Similarly, I believe that the horseless carraige should be outlawed. Those things are killing the stable business!

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In



ARCHIVES

Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
RIAA Stands Firm On High Damages For File-Sharing   
Should Web users who share music for free have to face the same potential liability as...
Will Google's Super Bowl Ad Backfire?   
For years consumer advocates have warned that Google poses a threat to Web users' privacy. Now,...
Showdown Looms Over Future Of Google Books   
In late 2008, the Department of Justice threatened to file an antitrust lawsuit against Google unless...
Will Comcast Move To 'Three Strikes' Regime After Buying NBC?   
Some digital rights advocacy groups have long criticized the prospect of "three strikes" policies, which would...
Critics Still Unhappy With Google Book Deal   
Some critics aren't any happier with the revised deal in the Google Book Search case than...
Obama Touts Neutrality, But Can FCC Deliver?   
President Barack Obama reiterated his support for net neutrality this week during an interview on YouTube....
Software Company Backs Passage Of Privacy Laws   
Faced with the use of its technology to track consumers without their permission, software company Adobe...
EFF Shows How Web Companies Can Track Cookie-Deleters   
Flash cookies aren't the only way of circumventing users' ability to opt out of online tracking....
Flash Of Criticism At FTC Privacy Roundtable    
Behavioral targeting companies had better call their lawyers. Federal Trade Commission consumer protection head David Vladeck...
Note To Facebook: Yes, Web Users DO Care About Privacy   
Earlier this month, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg infamously said that Web users no longer cared about...
>> Daily Online Examiner Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2010 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com