Welcome | View My Profile | Sign Out
MediaPost Home About MediaPost Privacy/Terms Media Kit Sitemap
Publications Home News
Online Media Daily Media Daily News Marketing Daily Mobile Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
Daily Feed> Email Daily Feed> Video Daily Feed> Social
Online Blogs
Online Spin Email Insider Search Insider Behavioral Insider Online Publishing Insider Mobile Insider Video Insider Gaming Insider Performance Insider Metrics Insider Social Media Insider Just An Online Minute Daily Online Examiner Raw Blog
Media Blogs
Research Brief Diane Mermigas:On Media TV Watch TV Board Magazine Rack Media Creativity Notes From the Digital Frontier Digital Outsider Mad Blog Red White and Blog
Marketing Blogs
Engage:Hispanics Engage:Kids 6-11 Engage:Moms Engage:Boomers Engage:Gen Y Engage:Teens Marketing:Green Marketing:Sports
Magazines
OMMA Magazine Media Magazine
Subscribe
Feedback Loop RSS Feeds Archives Subscribe
Dec 2 Search Insider Summit (Utah) Dec 6 Email Insider Summit (Utah) Jan 11 OMMA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 12 MEDIA Agency of the Year (NYC) Jan 26 OMMA Social (San Francisco) Jan 27 OMMA Performance (SF) Feb 24 OMMA Metrics Measurement (NYC) Feb 25 OMMA Behavioral (NYC) Mar 15 OMMA Global (San Francisco) Apr 14 Search Insider Summit (FL) Apr 18 Email Insider Summit (FL)
Recently Concluded Events
Nov 3 OMMA Adnets (NYC) Oct 30 OMMA Video (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile (LA) Oct 29 OMMA Mobile & Video (LA) Sep 23 Creative Media Awards (NYC) Sep 23 The Future Of Media (NYC) Sep 22 Online All Stars (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Awards (NYC) Sep 21 MediaPost Live at Advertising Week All-Access (NYC) Sep 21 OMMA Global New York (NYC)
All MediaPost/OMMA Events Event Blogging Past Event Videos
Industry Events Calendar
2010 OMMA Agency of the Year 2010 MEDIA Agency of the Year
2009 Creative Media Awards 2009 OMMA Awards 2009 Digital Out-of-Home Awards 2009 Media Agency of the Year 2009 OMMA Agency of the Year
All Awards
Employment Situations Wanted Services Offered Post a Job
Briefs Reports Online
MediaPost Directories
Mobile Insiders Group
People Finder Edit My Profile View My Profile My Contacts My Calendar
HOME • MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS • MEDIA KIT
Do We Still Need A Click-Through Rate Debate?
by Amy Auerbach, Tuesday, June 20, 2006, 1:31 PM

SHARE

TOOLS

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST READ

Perhaps it seems foolish to you for me to write a column on click-through rate in 2006. The online industry really got burned in the past because of this little metric. A metric whose value rarely ever reached the number one! But if you take a leap of faith and are foolish enough to read it, I think it will be worth your while.

There seemed to be general industry consensus that click-through rate served one purpose, and only one purpose--and that was to compare the performance of creative executions. If the "Buy Now" banner has a higher click-through rate than the "Half-price" banner, you can safely say that the "Buy Now" banner is generating more interest, and therefore is the higher-performing banner.

Apparently, however, click-through rate is alive and well in our industry. It is misleading agencies and clients alike about the performance of the Web sites of a campaign. If Site A has a higher click-through rate than Site B, does that mean Site A is performing better? Is Site A's audience more interested in our product? What if our campaign's click-through rate is .52 percent or .25 percent? Is one or the other good, bad, or average? Click-through rate can't really answer these questions for us because there is a lot to consider behind that number.

When attempting to examine the performance of one site versus another in a campaign, we need to look at as many factors as possible--with consideration of the objective, of course. Sites have many different characteristics that affect performance beyond just the audience type or demographics, for example. For instance, does the site have a high percentage of loyal and frequent visitors or a high percentage of wham-bam-thank you ma'am visitors who get what they need and never return? If most of the visitors are loyal, there is a greater chance of excess frequency to these users and a smaller chance of clicks against these impressions. This would result in a very low click-through rate. But if you can buy this type of audience at a very low rate, the cost of that click could be very efficient, and therefore an important part of a traffic-driving campaign.

If you are still reporting the click-through rates of sites in any reporting presented to clients, I implore you to stop. Because it is so easy to look at and talk about, it becomes the go-to metric for so many folks, and its use undermines the complexity of online media measurement. Even clients who have embraced the Internet still resort back to that little number. It is a number that is so meaningless--and sometimes even dangerous--that when used by an untrained professional it can wreak havoc that can result in hours of de-programming that even hundreds of PowerPoint slides can't achieve.

If you've read this far, I thank you for believing in me that talking about click-through rate is still important. If you think I'm overreacting, let me know. We are building an industry here, folks--we have to work together to make it the best it can be.

1 person recommends this article. 

35 comments on "Do We Still Need A Click-Through Rate Debate?"

  1. Neal Roe from Cobalt Group
    commented on: June 26, 2006 at 9:51 AM
    Our tool allows auto dealers to see the number of page views, etc. I encourage dealers to look at the number of site visitors and compare them to other numbers such as number of floor visitors, phone calls, and service visitors. The number of sales is what matters most and when we can connect a site visitor to a sale the dealers get it. When it becomes abstract they get weaker. They know it's a numbers game but they always go for the spot sale. I go in and build the value of their sites using these numbers and appreciate your pointing me in the right direction.

  2. angie onassis from peppermints
    commented on: June 25, 2006 at 2:54 AM
    Do you have any information about click through rates and sales? Im debating a campaign. My market is teens and tweens. I can imagin that tweens are likely to click on flashy banners on web site such as disney.com, but am having a hard time determining % of sales from clicks. IS there a standard? For example, 50,000 click throughs will produce this many sales?

  3. Kate clough from MRM Worldwide
    commented on: June 23, 2006 at 2:24 PM
    Thank you for writing this! I have been imploring my clients, peers, etc. to stop referencing CTRs for years, and yet, I hear people continuing to do this all the time. They are now caveating their comments by saying that the CTR is just one metric; just one piece of the total picture and that it should only be used "directionally", which is progress, but still dangerous. It should not be used directionally. I can only think of one reason to look and that is to spot any red flags that your creative may not be functioning properly (e.g., 0.001% CTR). That may sound rash to DR marketers, so I should mention that I work on brand-building (leading to offline sales) programs only.

    I'm stealing your second-to-the-last paragraph in hopes that you've said this better than I've ever been able to and that it will have more of an impact. Don't worry...I'll source the material. :)

  4. Chip Arndt from MerchantAdvantage
    commented on: June 22, 2006 at 11:15 AM
    Amy,

    Well stated, but I do think there are tracking tools in the marketplace on click through rates which do allow this metric to be very helpful. For instance, MerchantAdvantage (the name says it all) specializes in helping online merchants list only their best performing products on shopping destination sitees. It then offers its Chanlaytics(cool name) tool so online Merchants can then analyze how those marketing campaigns are working, which includes seeing what clicks are converting to sales. Check out MerchantAdvantage.com for their complete solution which I believe answers your concerns about click throughs and what they mean for online retailers.

    In my line of business, IF analyzed correctly, click-throughs are still critical...and if click-throughs don't then equate to a sale then you can see that immediately and tailor your marketing campaign accordingly with MerchantAdvanatge.

    And the best part is that you can have all of this for only $245 a month, pretty cost-effective.

    Best, Chip Arndt EVP Business Development MerchantAdvantage www.MerchantAdvantage.com

  5. Alison Childers from Range Online Media
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 5:46 PM
    On one hand, CTR is a junk metric. Keep in mind, in relation to Google and their QBB, it (CTR) is of supreme importance.

  6. Jordana Reim from Special Ops Media
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 3:35 PM
    This is great, but what do you pose as the solution? How do we track success for campaigns if not with CTR?

  7. Zorluhan Zorlu from Tribune
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 2:39 PM
    wow, there are a lot of comments and discussions here moving with multiple threads...That clearly shows that we still need debate on this topic :)

    Very nice post Amy!

  8. Scott Alperin from TechTracker, Inc.
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 2:11 PM
    Both the article and the discussion have been excellent, and I would love to see more thought and effort put into this area.

    A major problem is that not enough is invested in tracking other metrics. CTR is easily tracked, and reported in every system out there, but setting up effective post-click and conversion tracking can be time consuming (expensive). Tracking branding impact is much, much harder. The more layers you have (web site managers, marketing dept., ad agency, interactive creative production agency, media agency), the harder it is to effectively track past the click.

    No matter how difficult or expensive it is, there is so much evidence that CTR doesn't give you much useful information that it is crucial that post-click tracking is part of any campaign. If all you have is CTR, you are likely to come to the wrong conclusions about creative and site effectiveness.

    Another difficulty as a publisher is that campaigns are frequency optimized based on CTR, but then evaluated afterwards on ROI. So if you are tracking conversions, ROI, or other success metrics, use them or share them with the publisher early on. Any good publisher will take that information and make changes to hit the success metrics. If the only thing being used to optimize mid-campaign is the CTR, ROI will suffer.

    Finally, one of my pet peeves has always been the combination of focusing on CTR, but not paying attention to frequency. In almost every campaign I've ever looked at, the CTR drops to almost zero after 2 or 3 exposures. If CTR is the most important metric for you, buy frequency capping.

    Thanks,

    Scott Alperin Senior Manager, Strategy and Marketing, TechTracker Media

  9. Pascal Fintoni from The North East Regional Portal
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 3:47 AM
    Thank you very much for sharing you thoughts on click-through rates. For many years we have been advising businesses that looking at click-through rates in a vacuum is just as helpful as being obsessed with hits on a website.

    As you indicate in your article conversion and sales from the secured traffic are far more interesting indicators of success and I have experienced many instances whereby a site with modest click-throughs and visitors still did wonderfully well.

    It is very tempting to fall into the trap of the 'popularity contest' and forget about what we are all trying to achieve: getting the right number of potential customers finding out about our businesses and buying online, and if this number is only 10 per day and it is working for you then keep at it.

    Regards

    Pascal Fintoni, Head of Business Development, www.n-e-life.com

  10. Javed Sharif from Pinstorm Technologies Pvt Ltd.
    commented on: June 21, 2006 at 2:55 AM
    Hi Amy,

    I think CTR (Click Through Rate) is very important cause it tells us whether our audience is finding our ads useful or not. High CTR also means high interest in our ads. However I have also noticed that the same ad has low CTR at lower positions vis a vis at higher positions. So in deed CTR can be misleading in some cases. But for search professionals it can be one of the parameters to continually optimise the campaign and the ads.

    Cheers, Javed

  11. David Berkowitz from 360i
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 8:18 PM
    For the record, I'm in the camp that it is still a relevant metric, but it's a building block for reporting. It's the nucleus of a cell, for example. The cell wouldn't be alive if it didn't have that nucleus, but it needs all those other parts to be a living organism.

    Okay, my nephew's taking a high school biology final. He'd clearly outscore me if I had to take it, but I stand by the metaphor.

  12. Marc Kozai from Primedia
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 4:52 PM
    It is great that you are talking about how relative a CTR can be.. but what other measures do you use to impress advertisers?

  13. Eric Koefoot from Five Star Alliance
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:43 PM
    I could not agree more. Add in the complexity of the value of different audiences and their clicks such as their transaction size, their decision/purchase authority, and their ability to influence others on behalf of your company (just to name a few) and suddenly measuring click-throughs is merely the starting point.

    Eric Koefoot CEO, PrimeAxis Media

  14. Ron Welby from South Of Boston Media Group
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:34 PM
    Amy, Well said. Ask the advertisers how many click throughs the get from a billboard and other out door advertising.

    Regards, Ron Welby

  15. Bob Gordon from The Auto Channel
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:29 PM
    Thank for the article...I have been fighting the inexperienced, unknowledgeable and dishonest ad agency guys and gals for almost 11 years... so I thought you might get a kick out of an email exchange that I had 6 years ago with a rep from advertising.com...it seems that something just don't change easily...please read from the bottom up..oldest to newest... Bob Gordon President and Co-Flounder The Auto Channel.com

    I agree on the branding aspect of internet advertising. And the advertisers know darn well it exists. However, if we're ever going to get all the bucks these guys are spending on TV, radio, and print, we are going to have to prove the interactivity and performance of the net. We can do an effective CPM deal with you that includes a minimum CTR. Tell me what you have in mind.

    Mike Syran Network Account Manager Advertising.com (410) 244-0654 mailto:msyran@advertising.com

    -----Original Message----- From: Bob Gordon [mailto:bgordon@theautochannel.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 1:36 PM To: Mike Syran Cc: Mjrauch@Ns.Net Subject: RE: advertising

    Thanks Mike...we believe that there is a branding element to advertising on The Auto Channel and that someone should pay for that. We can work out a favorable CPM and you can keep all of the above your 21 cent pc revenue. Bob

    -----Original Message----- From: Mike Syran [mailto:msyran@advertising.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 12:45 PM To: 'Bob Gordon' Subject: RE: advertising

    Bob,

    Thanks for your reply. What I would like you to consider is the advertising inventory that is unsold from month to month. It earns you "zip". I can give you html codes that you can cut and paste as needed, and we'll throw ads for you while you continue your inhouse marketing efforts. When you get rate card for the inventory, simply replace us. When a campaign ends, stick us back up. Its a 100% sold out solution. Our payouts start at around $.21 per click and we have standard and odd sized banners as well as daughter windows and text links. If you publish a newsletter, we can help you generate revenue from that as well.

    Mike Syran Network Account Manager Advertising.com (410) 244-0654 mailto:msyran@advertising.com

    -----Original Message----- From: Bob Gordon [mailto:bgordon@theautochannel.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 9:21 AM To: msyran@advertising.com Cc: Mjrauch@Ns.Net Subject: RE: advertising

    Dear Mike,

    Thank you for your interest in The Auto Channel (TACH).

    As you've seen while TACH'ing, we go "Way Beyond The Banner" and offer a broad range of exciting and impactful sponsorship and advertising opportunities...from exclusive integrated co-branded advetorial sections, which are custom designed for each sponsor, to broad reach multi-platform impression programs, to targeted rotating banners at competitive CPM's.

    Unlike virtually every other "automotive site", only The Auto Channel acts like an Interactive Television Network with a unique editorial direction, "everything that is automotive".

    TACH attracts an Internet savvy audience comprised of both automotive enthusiasts and smart consumers who visit us to use the best research tools on the web: "New Car Buyers Guide", Used Car Buyers Guide, Aftermarket Buyers Guide and soon to come, Tire Buyers Guide, Classic Car Buyers Guide and Auto Service Buyers Guide.

    TACH on-line tools are free and deliver information that "levels the playing field" and allows consumers to make intelligent purchase decisions.

    Viewers also use TACH to access information to help them answer a variety of maintenance and parts questions like,"how to do it?", "who makes it?", "where to buy it?" "is it worth it?" and "do I really need it?"

    In addition to transportation-focused information, TACH visitors have access to the broadest and deepest on-demand live and archived Motor Sports...from exclusive saturation coverage of NASCAR events to pre and post race reports from around the world.

    In fact "Yahoo Internet Life" magazine named The Auto Channel as the "Best Auto Sports Web Site" in their July 1999 issue.

    TACH continues to lead the industry by exploiting the Internet's native capabilities, which allows our editors, writers and producers to deliver information and entertainment in the "best media available", as: Text; Video; Images; or Audio.

    As the Broadband revolution builds momentum and "Fat Pipes" become ubiquitous, TACH's Interactive TV-like content delivery philosophy, will attract an even larger audience by meeting the exploding functionality expectations of sophisticated Internet users.

    I would like to understand your advertising goals and budget levels in order to recommend the most effective way to participate as a sponsor on The Auto Channel ...let's speak.

    Bob Gordon 502 584 4100

    -----Original Message----- From: Mike Syran (by way of Mark Fulmer ) [mailto:msyran@advertising.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 1:02 PM To: bgordon@theautochannel.com Subject: advertising

    Hello:

    I represent Advertising.com, an interactive internet advertising agency. I am interested in purchasing advertising inventory on your site.

    Please get back to me at your earliest convenience.

    Warm regards,

    Mike Syran Network Account Manager Advertising.com (410) 244-0654 mailto:msyran@advertising.com

  16. Bob Gordon from The Auto Channel
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:24 PM
    Aprapo

  17. Amy Auerbach from Media Contacts
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:23 PM
    Hi Folks,

    Thanks for all the feedback!

    Dana-I'm only referring to click through rate here as clicks/impressions for banner ads on websites. I would call home page to landing page a click stream of some sort.

    Others-I agree with many of your points, it can be used in the context of other metrics perhaps but definitely never alone or even singled out. I think Dave said it well as a "nice to know"

    Also, I was only able to use the one scenario of loyal vs. light users because I only have 600 words :) There could be dozens of scenarios where CTR is misleading.

    I am looking forward to ongoing dialogue!

    Best, Amy

  18. Jason Cantor from Ubisoft
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:20 PM
    There are two factors that determine the cost per click.

    1. The click through rate 2. The CPM

    When you discount the importance of one of these factors I don't see how you can effectively forecast a targeted CPM to meet your client's marketing objectives. Without a balance between analyzing CPM and click through rate you are providing your client with an ineffective media strategy completely ignores 1/2 the cost per click equation.

    To ignore the click through rate means you must also ignore the cost per click metric for online advertising campaigns.

  19. Marcus Miller from WSM Advertising & PR
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:07 PM
    Wow, I havene't seen "wham-bam-thank you ma'am" used in an article in a long time. I love it (really, I not kidding.) If you're really brave, you'll use "your turn in the barrel" next.

    Marcus Miller Host- The Advertising Workshop BizRadio 1360, Saturdays 10a-11a

  20. Peter Nein from HighBeam Research
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 3:01 PM
    Do you think that it is useless for determining how well emails and newsletters perform?

    Not usless, but I have always felt newsletters, at least, tend to be more print and hang on the cubie wall or fridge or what-have-you. If you newsletter is relevent and contains actual information on the front page rather than a bunch of links, it can then truely become a branding tool.

  21. Molly Louthan from Thomas, Townsend and Kent
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:53 PM
    Do you think that it is useless for determining how well emails and newsletters perform?

  22. Rebecca Muller from Delvinia Interactive
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:49 PM
    I think click-through rate is important - and as was said needs to be taken into account and compared with multiple factors.

    For example, how does the click-through rate look in comparison with the conversion rate and overall ROI objectives (CPA/CPC)?

    You can take some directional learning from those findings, perhaps the site or ad had a really high click-through rate - but maybe the ad was just fun. Perhaps the ad not as interactive had a better conversion rate.

    Click-through rates are still important, but definitely should not be the only metric that is measured with regards to campaign or site success.

  23. jeffrey kent from adbrite
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:22 PM
    Perhaps I came off too strongly in my last note... lol... In my statement I mean to suggest that there are few givens when it comes to finding success and determining complete and total perfect metrics when it comes to digital advertising. CTR is as much so, if not more, relevant that CPM, CPV, and CPC. CPA is the ultimate statistic that these measures come to, but when looking at the measure of success on a site- if it's conversions or simply traffic brokerage- CTR can very easily fall into that important statistic category.

  24. jeffrey kent from adbrite
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:17 PM
    I think your article is unnecessary and certainly oversimplifies the issue. There are so many factors taht go into the successful advertising of a website that CTR is one of the most relevant tools available to determine potential conversions and audience reach. Regardless if they are many uniques or few loyals, the reach is still applicable. If there are any other relvent measures so readily available to use, I'd like to see an article written about THAT instead.

  25. Tarah Higgins from VEGAS.com
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:12 PM
    I hear what you're saying, and I think in the wrong hands/context, that metric can be very misleading. Another common mistake people make is assuming that a high click through rate is always better. Savvy marketers know that higher click through doesn't always mean higher buy through; deciding to optimize campaigns solely based on CTR is negligent, particularly if you are in a Direct Response focused environment. People have to be willing to use additional metrics like buy through rate, ROI, net revenue, CPA, etc in order to get the full picture of how a media buy or a site is doing.

  26. Dave Benefiel from Avenue A|Razorfish
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 2:00 PM
    We'll keep showing CTR, along with 10 other metrics. No single one tells the whole picture. Click through rate is sort of a nice-to-know, but tracking through to conversion is obviously more important.

    Let's talk about the scenario you mentioned, whereby CTR is driven down due to attracting loyal customers. You are suggesting we ignore the low CTR because it is attracting the loyals who are later ignoring our creative. Are you going to stake your business on the few loyal customers you have? You aren't worries about attracting droves of new customers? If you aren't looking at both, you aren't going to make it.

  27. Paul Plawin from Governing Magazine
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:57 PM
    I couldn't agree with you more! Nice job!

  28. Caradoc Ehrenhalt from ValueClick
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:55 PM
    Excellent!

  29. Lynn Haller from The Adsert Group
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:55 PM
    What exactly is "click through"?

  30. Eric Nash from LoanWeb
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:52 PM
    Hi Amy,

    While I agree with you that too much emphasis gets placed on CTR (8 out of 10 times, our highest CTR creatives get a worse ROI than the lower CTR creatives), I dont necessary agree that it's irrelevant.

    The first step in the puzzle is getting consumers to your site -- and that starts with CTR. From that point, you've got to have an effective Click to Conversion (C2C) to really make it work.

    Being in the very competitive mortgage space, we certainly have seen most of the magic happen on the landing page -- changing copy, images, and layout have all produced the biggest bang for the buck.

    Enjoyed the article. Thanks! Eric Nash Online Marketing Manager LoanWeb.com

  31. Alec Campbell from iChannel Strategies
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:47 PM
    CTR is a useful metric but only when used in context with other metrics. For instance, a high ad CTR on a CPC campaign would be considered poor performance if no actions were taken post-click.

  32. Dana Todd from SiteLab International Inc.
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:45 PM
    Can you clarify "click through rate" as is pertains to Websites? Do you mean the percentage of people who click from home/landing page into a secondary page, or do you mean the percentage who click an "action" button such as Buy, Download, or Join? Thanks, Dana Todd SiteLab

  33. David Dalka from Free Agent
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:42 PM
    happy to befriend people who think like you...

    David Dalka www.daviddalka.com

  34. Cathy Knight from TDS Telecom
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:42 PM
    Thank you, thank you, thank you. I'm in the middle of a heated debate about this very topic. Thanks for the ammunition.

    Cathy

  35. Dayna Lown from Verizon
    commented on: June 20, 2006 at 1:40 PM
    Hey Amy!!!!

    Just thought I would say hello and say what an awesome article!!

    Hope all is well with you!

    XOXO Dayna

Leave a Comment

You must be signed in to comment. Sign In

Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this article -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.

AMY AUERBACH
  • Amy Auerbach is VP, Group Account Director at Media Contacts.


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES

Recent Online Spin Articles
The Loss Of Apprenticeships Is A Tragedy    
I had breakfast earlier this week with Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack, a friend who is...
Time To Eliminate Vacation Policies?   
There was quite a stir a few months ago when an internal presentation about how Netflix...
A Simple Prediction For 2010    
I've decided that making predictions in a climate which is so tenuous and conservative could be...
Understanding Social Media 2.0: The Widget Is Dead    
The Internet was around for many years before it got its "2.0" designation. Social media has...
How News Spreads Today: The Media-tization Of The Big Black Phone    
When I was a kid, a phone ringing in the middle of the night meant only...
Caskets? Great Deals At Costco   
'm not easy to market to. I'm loyal to few brands. I shun most advertising. I'm...
End The Debate: Go Ahead, Charge For Your Online Content    
"Web communism" and "ubiquity is the new exclusivity" were among the lines being traded in a...
Coupon Clippers Proven To Drive Incremental Sales   
Digital couponing has risen dramatically in the last 12 months because consumers are more concerned with...
The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace   
There is a race going on that a lot of people don't fully understand -- but...
Brand Velocity And Your Business Model   
We often affirm the necessity of thoughtful consumer brand marketing that conveys and sustains the brand....
>> Online Spin Archives 
ABOUT MEDIAPOST • MASTHEAD • MEDIA KIT • RSS FEEDS • PRIVACY/TERMS & CONDITIONS
©2009 MediaPost Communications. All rights reserved.
1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001
tel. 212-204-2000, fax 212-204-2038, feedback@mediapost.com