Commentary

High-Profile Publishers Call For The Demise Of Ad Networks At The Industry's (And Their Own) Peril

Premium online publishers are spreading a gospel throughout the online advertising space that is both misguided and could be destructive to the future of online advertising. In calling for the elimination of Ad Networks, they are disregarding the well being of both advertisers and mid-size publishers. In defending their position, they make arguments that serve their own short term interests, but harm the long-term interests of the industry as a whole.
 
Their arguments tend to fail the collective online advertising landscape in three distinct ways:
 
1) In an industry otherwise dominated by players with the largest bank account and profile, Ad Networks serve to ‘level the playing field.’
 
2) In an industry desperately trying to come to terms with brand protection and content regulation issues, Ad Networks may be the only third party players positioned to facilitate these changes.
 
3) In an industry evolving faster than the speed of a Google search, Ad Networks provide both advertisers and publishers a single point of entry and management. 
 
Leveling the Playing Field
A currently unregulated online marketplace allows premium “marquee” level publishers free reign to charge advertisers whatever CPMs the market will bear. Advertisers with hopes of cashing in on these publishers’ enormous audiences are shelling out more money than they should be, in a falsely inflated market, where premium publisher sales teams continue to drive up the price. With this type of monopoly over inflated advertising dollars, it is not hard to see why premium publishers are fighting against inevitable CPM regulation, and waging a public relations war against Ad Networks.  
 
Further participation of all partners, large AND small, will drive price transparency and will lead to a smoother market pricing cycle. Currently, mid-size publishers who have valuable audiences, but who lack the cache of premium publishers, are selling their inventory short due to lack of proper representation. Selling under market value is just as harmful to the industry as selling far above market value. It drags down the entire industry and creates an atmosphere where mid-size publishers are not growing at the rate they otherwise could be.  
 
Meanwhile, advertisers are left confused by seemingly random pricing structures and only engage the industry with trepidation. A consolidated market, where Ad Networks move publisher revenue more towards a priced middle, and therefore regulate pricing structure, will create a reasonable across-the-board expectation of what ad space is actually worth. This will create the stability advertisers need to fully embrace the industry.
 
Brand Protection and Content Regulation
Centralized standards and practices continue to elude the online ad space, causing advertisers to continue to place the majority of their advertising dollars into traditional media. Even with the knowledge that people are increasingly spending more time online than they spend watching television, listening to radio or reading print periodicals combined, some advertisers are still opting for safety over increased potential brand exposure. Grabbing a larger share of advertising dollars requires trust, and trust is earned through proven content regulation practices. Ad Networks hold the key to this kind of regulation through their ability and power to create online standards and practices.  
 
Because they ‘touch’ a myriad of both advertisers and publishers, Ad Networks have the third party objectivity necessary to establish a code of conduct and ratings for online inventory. The continuous auditing and rating of online content will provide greater transparency for the advertiser, stricter content regulations for publishers, and a system of deterrents that will discourage violations. Organizations like the IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) and IASH in the UK are already collaborating with Ad Networks to propose ideas for best practices in the online advertising space, using other media regulatory ratings systems as established models from which to work.
 
Looked at with an open mind, then, Ad Networks could hold the key to ushering in a new era of online advertising security.
 
Ease of Use 
Providing a single point of entry into a space that not only contains multitudes, but continues to evolve at a breathtaking pace, Ad Networks have the ability to deliver true ‘ease of use’ for both advertisers and publishers. Advertisers enjoy pricing of scale, reaching a large audience within their demographic, and the convenience of spending their advertising dollars quickly and simply without the complications of speaking with thousands of publishers. When it comes to media buys, advertisers are accustomed to speaking to one, two or maybe three outlets to get all of their planning done. Advertisers do not want to take the time to go hunting for quality inventory nor do they want to haggle over pricing with thousands of publishers who can’t seem to agree on a set market price structure.  
 
Publishers should not get bogged down in the business of advertising sales. They are  most productive and most consistent  to their audience when they are free to focus on quality and growth of their content. While the highest profile publishers (those that are household names, for example) may be able to afford an internal sales team, for most rank-and-file publishers devoting resources to the ad sales process means taking resources away from what they know best.  Publishers should want to plug into the richest pool of advertisers possible and through the largest Ad Networks, serving hundreds of advertisers at any given time, are going to have the most advertisers to offer them.
 
Premium publishers can also benefit from the ease of use associated with Ad Networks.  
 
For every dollar premium publishers generate through in-house sales efforts, they are also hindering their ability to conserve revenue. Their profits are being undermined by paying for in-house salespeople whom require training, management, salaries and commissions. These expenses raise the stakes and perpetuate the cycle of inflation. Outsourcing their inventory to an Ad Network allows premium publishers to move their asking price more towards the middle, but allows them to continue to be profitable by streamlining their payroll, and focusing their efforts on content.

In industry that features a level playing field, strong brand protection through content regulation and single points of entry into a fragmented landscape is, in fact, an industry that can weather these harder economic times and provide a rising tide capable of lifting all boats. While the mammoth publishers may prefer that these reforms do not take shape, leaving them to prosper in an every-man-for-himself environment, the truth is that a stronger online advertising industry is a benefit to all and Ad Networks have a role to play in achieving that goal.
 
The question is not, “Do Ad Networks have a place in the online ad space?” but rather, “If Ad Networks are the future of the online ad space, how can we open up a discussion that will allow for a united industry where everyone grows together?”
8 comments about "High-Profile Publishers Call For The Demise Of Ad Networks At The Industry's (And Their Own) Peril ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Brian Spencer from JWT Action, July 28, 2009 at 9:04 a.m.

    Premium sites may have a war against ad networks, but ad networks haven’t done themselves any favors. “Transparent” and “safe” are not the first words that come to mind when advertisers think of their experiences with ad networks.

  2. Katie Roper from Caring.com, July 28, 2009 at 9:11 a.m.

    "...Publishers should not get bogged down in the business of advertising sales." SAY WHAT? Does that mean software developers should not get bogged down in the mundane business of enterprise sales? Or car companies should not get bogged down in the petty business of selling cars (look how well that worked for GM).

    If you're a publisher, selling ads is how you pay for all your great content development. Ignore it at your peril.

    But calling for the abolition of ad networks is silly, too. All you have to do is not use them.

  3. Tom Bowman from BBC Worldwide, July 28, 2009 at 9:24 a.m.

    Ad Networks are not paragons of virtue and perhaps more significantly do not have the leverage to determine the future of the business - more likely they will get caught in the middle. Advertisers don't all want the same things, it is easier to imagine polarisation looking forward. Premium remains, Ad Exchanges at the other end provides the true cost savings for publishers and advertisers with different mass objectives. As a publisher how you segment and market your precious inventory is key. That is how you justify price. There is no 'artificial inflation' of pricing. Value is in the mind of the buyer. Always has been. EG for any purchase the question is: 'Did you pay the right price?' Answer: If you think you did, then you did.

  4. Tim Daly, July 28, 2009 at 11:56 a.m.

    An increased focus on providing substantial audience targeting capabilities is really going to be the key for Ad Networks over the next 12-18 months. You can already see this evolving at Ad Networks such as Turn and Collective Media, as they embrace a focus on effective audience targeting. Publishers and Advertisers are maturing in their media purchasing practices and need to receive more value than simple arbitraging optimization. Advertisers want to reach an audience that will take desired actions, not just views and clicks. Those Ad Networks that deliver upon the Advertiser demands will be the ones that will likely succeed by offering more than just basic arbitraging tactics.

  5. Rajeev Goel from PubMatic, July 29, 2009 at 2:23 a.m.

    There are two clear delineations in the market emerging (or perhaps they were always there): guaranteed delivery and non-guaranteed delivery.

    For some advertising campaigns, guaranteed delivery is required (specific time slots, locations, custom delivery, etc.). For some campaigns, non-guaranteed delivery is adequate.

    The market is becoming increasingly polarized with dollars flowing into highly customized guaranteed delivery campaigns on the one hand, and audience-based and performance-based non-guaranteed delivery campaigns on the other hand. Ad networks have a key role to play in the non-guaranteed solution space, and will continue to do well as advertisers shift dollars into this buying format.

  6. Q L, July 31, 2009 at 2:32 a.m.

    Wow. Respectfully, I could not disagree more.

    I honestly don’t believe that networks add all that much value. Seriously.

    To me, the author of the article seems to confuse the role of a marketplace, aka an exchange, and the role of networks – the middlemen/resellers/aggregators of online inventory.

    Exchanges make markets more efficient. They’re great.

    Middlemen are necessary inefficiencies in primitive markets. They eventually get disintermediated because in an increasingly efficient market, they have no place. As markets mature, a middleman is an extra mouth to feed with no good reason for existing.

    The hilarious thing is this: Agencies have flung themselves headlong into a collision course with networks. (You should have seen the sparks fly at the OMMA panel in LA on Tuesday.) Some get it: by learning the data skills of the networks, they increase their ability to advise their clients on how and when to buy inventory. Others don’t, trying instead to *become* networks, when that will create fundamental conflicts of interest and put them into a niche that will sooner or later die out anyway...

  7. Rob Rasko, August 5, 2009 at 3:50 p.m.

    I am thoroughly encouraged by the responses to my article, as creating a healthy debate is always my intension.

    I stand on our position that ad networks, because of their relationships with so many different types of publishers and advertisers are the unique position to help the ecosystem in the long term. Additionally, as this is a service industry, ad networks are much better positioned to deliver on this promise than are “no-service” exchanges.

    With that said, this is all a work in progress and, indeed, there is a long road ahead for all of us. One comment that did strike me, and that I tend to agree with with, discussed how networks can give more visability to their individual publishers. This is something that networks are going to have to do better in the future to help preserve and grow the brands of the publishers we work with. For those that may be interested, I wrote another article about what a network should look like in the future. You can read that article here. http://bit.ly/LaQrA

  8. Edmund Carey from Undertone Networks, August 10, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.

    Many service and entertainment businesses sell identical products through multiple sales channels, this is called price discrimination (think movie theater, then DVD, then cable, then broadcast...)

    Would the world be a better place if you could purchase an airline ticket ONLY from the airline instead of through travel discounters?

    What if you could only see a movie in the theater and nowhere else? It would cost $30 a ticket and that wouldn't be good for consumers or businesses.

    What if you could only buy Calvin Klein undies on Madison Avenue instead of Macy's?

    Online site content isn't different, although those producers think it is.

    The only markets that can avoid this are monopolies - hence the enormous success of the ad networks today, and tomorrow.

    Publishers and networks can be successful together, just like the examples mentioned here.

Next story loading loading..