Likewise, The Seattle Times writes: "Amazon
wants to tamp down prices as competitors such as Barnes & Noble Inc., Sony Corp. and Apple Inc. line up to challenge its dominant position in the rapidly expanding market."
Macmillan wanted to raise its prices, so, on Friday, Amazon responded by pulling the publisher's books -- both digital and physical -- from its shelves. By Sunday, a backlash from Macmillan authors
and supporters forced Amazon to relent, and agree to the new pricing model.
"Pricing," notes author and Brave New World blogger Martyn Daniels, "is an emotive issue and digital pricing ... clearly is now becoming a
battlefield."
Though not directly involved, it was obvious to many analysts that Apple and its souped up e-reader were in fact responsible the coup.
"The unseen actor in
this little mini-drama, of course, was Apple," writes GigaOm. "With the launch of the iPad, the consumer
electronics giant tilted the balance of power in the e-book market decisively away from former leader Amazon, even though Apple's device isn't shipping yet."
Adds The Times:
"Amazon's decision is also a victory for Apple's chief executive, Steven P. Jobs, who first pitched the idea of selling e-books under the agency model to book publishers earlier this year ... Now
Apple, whose iPad tablet is due in March, can compete on fairly equal footing with Amazon."
Meanwhile, the debate continues to rage over at writer John Scalzi's Whatever blog, where he writes: "Leaving
aside the moral, philosophical, cultural and financial implications of this weekend's Amazon/Macmillan slapfight and What It All Means for book readers and the future of the publishing industry, in
one very real sense the whole thing was an exercise in public communications."