Pool Makes Splash At IAB: Reveals User-Selected Ads Five Times More Effective Than Pre-Roll

Pool Book Covers

 

It may have seemed like a no-brainer when Publicis' VivaKi unit leaked the findings of an ambitious study to find an alternative to the current online video advertising standard - the pre-roll unit - that consumers might simply prefer select which ads they are shown online, but the real surprise is how much that preference affects the effectiveness of online video advertising. According to detailed findings released Monday at the Interactive Advertising Bureau's Leadership Conference, it is nearly five times more effective.

"That's crazy good," gushed Tracey Scheppach, the Starcom executive who oversaw the 16-month study, which collaborated with a variety of online video purveyors, including Hulu, who's AdSelector method was deemed the best new online video advertising format, albeit somewhat modified. Instead of simply enabling users to select, which creative from a given advertising brand they could watch prior to an online video session, the modified approach enabled users to pick brands from different product categories that might be more personally relevant to a user.

The result, Scheppach said during a briefing with Online Media Daily late last week, was that "unaided awareness," the criteria she prizes most among advertising recall criteria, rose 386% over conventional pre-roll ads evaluated during the test.

"If you love them, set them free," Scheppach said of the finding, paraphrasing a popular song by Sting. By them, of course, she means the consumer's ability to choose which ads they see, a concept that has been assumed to boost relevance and recall, but which has never before been validated to the extent of the new research. Specifically, she said, the average findings of the study found that when people select their own ads, they have an unaided awareness of 68% vs. only 14% for standard pre-roll ad exposure.

Another key finding of the research, and one that Scheppach said was personally even more surprising for her, was that when given the option, people selected their own online video ads 45% of the time.

"I was surprised that 45% of them chose, primarily because we didn't use any sophisticated addressability to it. We basically just took three different ads and put them up there," she explained.

Asked why the other 55% of users did not proactively pick the ads they were exposed to, Scheppach said half of those respondents said it was because none of the three ads they were able to choose from were personally relevant to them.

"The sophisticated part is that we have to figure out how to serve the most relevant ads to them," Scheppach said, adding that would be the focus of the next phase of research, which falls under the broader banner of "The Pool," a series of research studies VivaKi has embarked on to improve the effectiveness of online advertising for its clients, and to boost Publicis' P&L in the process.

Among other things, the findings of the Pool's research, and how it is applied, are the intellectual property of Publicis, and the agency holding company is developing a strategy for how to exploit that. Scheppach said that's still formative, and that the agency ultimately would like to see the entire industry benefit from the findings and utilize the techniques developed through the Pool, but she said the initial application would likely be for Publicis' agency clients, and that it remained to be seen whether other agencies and marketers would pay Publicis for the privilege of its insights. Among the possible scenarios she said, was the idea of spinning the AdSelector system off into a separate, free-standing business that would service the entire industry. Ad agencies have successfully incubated similar technology solutions in the past. DoubleClick, which the No. 1 ad server in the online industry, which is now owned by Google, for example, was originally incubated at Poppe Tyson, a now defunct ad agency that was part of Bozell, another now defunct ad agency, that has been absorbed into Interpublic.

Scheppach said the commercial exploitation of the AdSelector findings would likely take time to develop, and that the next phase of the research would focus on methods for improving "addressability" and finding ways to get a greater percentage of online users to select the ads they are exposed to.

5 comments about "Pool Makes Splash At IAB: Reveals User-Selected Ads Five Times More Effective Than Pre-Roll".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. The digital Hobo from TheDigitalHobo.com, February 23, 2010 at 1:34 p.m.

    Why not open the options up to more advertisers by letting a consumer choose a category of ads, but running a number of different advertisers through it?

    still seems like we're talking about targeting capabilities and not about "formats" per se.

  2. Walter Sabo from SABO media, February 23, 2010 at 4:14 p.m.

    Hitviews has found that far more effective than a pre-roll which has a ZERO X in it, is to have online webstars integrate brand information into their highly watched shows.

    People select their favorite stars is even more effecitve than people selecting their favorite ads.

  3. Nelson Yuen from Stereotypical Mid Sized Services Corp., February 23, 2010 at 4:16 p.m.

    I agree with the digital hobo. An ad is comprised of relevancy + appeal. Great ads may not necessarily be relevant to the end user, but maybe the end user prefers to consume the ad given limited options. Giving audiences choice of brands doesn't really say anything. Getting opt in for the types of things the audience is interested in is a TOTALLY different story.

    So the study doesn't say much about HOW to approach audiences, as it represents just another way to target end users with certain brands. (In this case, targeting is based on audience choice.)

    EX. If you force me to pick between 3 brands, Victoria Secrets, Frito Lay, or Bounty, guess which one I'm picking?

    (Frito Lay... duh I love Corn Chips... JK)

  4. Jim Burnette from FreeAllMusic.com, February 23, 2010 at 6:06 p.m.

    FreeAllMusic.com has been using a similar Brand Selector ad model for months. Registered users CHOOSE a brand to FREE premium content (music downloads). The Brand Selector page has 12 choices. Brands provide their Target demo and we serve ads to our users based on the info. A Male 18-34 user is NOT going to see a Brand that is targeting W18-49.

    Unlike HULU, Free All Music provides its users with OWNERSHIP of premium content. 5 downloads a week/20 a month.

    Loyalty Component Unique to FAM Model:

    I Choose Your Brand To Get the Music I Want

    You’re Giving Me Something I Want-Free!

    I’m Coming Back Every Week for More

    Join Now!!!

  5. Alex Danzberger from A Harris & Associates LLC, February 24, 2010 at 8:26 a.m.

    Not so sure the conclusions are "new" or "novel" as relevancy has always driven consumer interest and awareness. To Digital Hobo's point, this is really about targeting, isn't it? Aren't the algorithms just trying to estimate relevancy based upon behavioral and appended demographic information? If a consumer can provide EXACT preferences and demographic data, relevancy will increase dramatically. So, the answer seems to be to let consumers into the process?

Next story loading loading..