FCC Bans Broadband Providers From Blocking Traffic Or Creating Fast Lanes

The Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday to impose net neutrality rules that prohibit broadband providers from blocking or degrading traffic and from creating online fast lanes.

“Today history is being made by a majority of this commission as we vote for a fast, fair and open Internet,” Chairman Tom Wheeler said toward the conclusion of the agency's meeting early Thursday afternoon.

The FCC's three Democrats voted in favor of the order, which reclassifies broadband service as a utility, while the two GOP commissioners opposed the move.

“The Internet is simply too important to allow broadband providers to be the ones making the rules,” Wheeler said, as the audience at the Washington, D.C. meeting cheered.

“The Internet has replaced the functions of the telephone and the Post Office. The Internet has redefined commerce and entertainment,” Wheeler said in a short statement delivered immediately before the vote. “The Internet is the ultimate vehicle for free expression.”

The FCC head also dismissed criticisms from Republicans that the new rules mark a government takeover of the Web.

“This proposal has been described by one opponent as a, quote, 'Secret plan to regulate the Internet,'” he said. “Nonsense. This is no more a plan to regulate the Internet than the First Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech.”

In addition to outright bans on blocking service, degrading service and creating fast lanes, the new rules also have a “general conduct” clause that will allow the FCC to take action if ISPs adopt practices that harm either consumers or content companies.

The FCC hasn't yet published its 300-plus page order, and details about the general conduct clause remain vague.

That lack of clarify spurred the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation -- which supports net neutrality principles -- to say that the general conduct rule we are deeply concerned that the FCC’s new rules will include a provision that “sounds like a recipe for overreach and confusion.”

Internet service providers stridently oppose decision to reclassify broadband as a utility service, which is regulated under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. Among other arguments, ISPs say that Title II regulations -- initially developed for telephone companies -- aren't suited to more modern technology.

Verizon played up that argument in a statement -- issued in Morse code, and translated on a separate Web page -- criticizing the FCC's “'Throwback Thursday' Move.” Verizon says the FCC's order “imposes rules on broadband Internet services that were written in the era of the steam locomotive and the telegraph.

But net neutrality proponents, including some academics and lawmakers, hailed the new rules. Stanford Law Professor Barbara van Schewick called the FCC's vote “among the greatest public interest victories in U.S. history,” while Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said the vote marked “our country’s Declaration of Innovation.”

Markey added: “Today, we say our economy and the free expression of ideas depend on net neutrality. Today, we say net neutrality is here to stay.”

The FCC's vote came more than one year after a federal appellate court invalidated prior net neutrality regulations, which were less stringent than the ones imposed on Thursday. Those regulations prohibited ISPs from blocking or degrading traffic, and prohibited wireline (but not wireless) providers from engaging in certain kinds of discrimination.

The appeals court vacated the old rules on the grounds that they imposed common-carrier regulations on ISPs, which were then classified as “information” services. The court said that only the FCC could not subject information services to utility-style rules.

After that decision came out, net neutrality proponents urged the FCC to reclassify broadband as a utility service in order to pass the kinds of rules that would hold up in court. Initially, Wheeler appeared to resist doing so. Instead, in May he proposed a set of rules that would have prohibited ISPs from blocking or degrading service, but could have allowed them to charge content companies higher fees for priority delivery.

That proposal drew an unprecedented 4 million comments, many of which opposed the plan. In November, President Obama publicly weighed in and urged the FCC to reclassify broadband as a utility service.

Obama's statement spurred some Republican lawmakers to question whether the White House exerted undue influence over the FCC. But Wheeler told reporters on Thursday that he has been developing a plan that included reclassification since the summer.

The new rules won't take effect until 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register.


3 comments about "FCC Bans Broadband Providers From Blocking Traffic Or Creating Fast Lanes".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. J S from Ideal Living Media, February 26, 2015 at 5:31 p.m.

    I much appreciate use of the word "Nonsense" above. The last-minute fear-mongering of the telecoms and their sycophants not only was far too little, too late, but made no sense whatsoever. It underscored the need for this FCC regulatory change.

  2. John Casey from Carmichael Industries, March 5, 2015 at 1:58 p.m.

    SXSW attendees, NFL game attendees, etc. will appreciate knowing that their mobile device connection speeds will grind to a near halt during times of heavy usage, since broadband providers won't be able to fairly ramp up bandwidth to match demand. ' We're here from the Government and we're here to help.'...now give us our new revenue stream. 'But see, it has to be good (and imposed), because we're using the right labels of "fair", "open", and "neutral". Just like the current White House's administration is the most open and transparent of all time (wink, wink).' Suckers!

  3. John Casey from Carmichael Industries, March 5, 2015 at 2:01 p.m.

    ...and yes, wireless devices frequently connect to WiFi networks. Just like the makeshift WiFi access points created for large events.

Next story loading loading..