Developer Introduces 'Cost-Per-Second' Ad Model, Calls It The 'CPC For Brands'

In an effort to “de-risk” the cost of buying media, a mobile ad developer is introducing a new model that charges advertisers based on the amount of time a consumer is actually exposed to their ads. The model -- which is being introduced today by Sled Mobile, which has been marketing high-impact mobile ad units via a network of major publishers -- is called “cost-per-second," or CPS, and is intended to replace conventional media cost models like cost-per-thousand and cost-per-click, which charge based on gross impressions or actions.

Sled founder and CEO Marc Guldimann says the company is prepared to take on the risk of the time-based ad model, because it knows its ad formats work at attracting and holding consumer attention, and that over time, the model will encourage the development of even better ads in terms of users’ experiences.



“This is the CPC for brand advertisers,” says Guldimann, referring to the fact that performance marketers like cost-per-click models, because they only pay for actions that are potential leads or conversions. While CPC might be too high an order to ask of branding campaigns that don’t necessarily have a call-to-action, Guldimann says the cost-per-second model is its equivalent because advertisers are only paying for the time they have a consumer’s attention.

“They don’t have to take any risk for their brand advertising,” he says, adding that the model has two main criteria for ads to be successful:

“One, the ad has to be interruptive. And two, it has to be controlled by the user,” he explains.

Guldimann says those criteria are exactly what Sled Mobile’s formats are designed to do for advertisers and consumers on mobile screens, and in the six months that it has been operating it has fielded more than 80 campaigns across 20 different publishers -- companies such as AOL, Bonnier, Time Inc. and Wenner Media -- that shows consumers will engage with high-impact ad units that they can control by turning on and off.

Over time, Guldimann says the goal is to leverage the cost-per-second model beyond Sled Mobile’s formats to become an exchange for any cost-per-second ad formats, and it is building a platform to do exactly that. The platform, dubbed Parsec, is an allusion to the per-second model (as well as an astronomical unit of measure), and Guldimann envisions it emerging as a new programmatic ad model in which advertisers trade with publishers based only on the time consumers are exposed to and engaged with their ad messages. The model, he says, is an elegant solution to industry debates concerning “viewability,” fraud and non-human traffic, because brands only pay for exposure to user-controlled ads.

“We know this will work because we’ve been running these formats through publishers on a CPM basis for six months now. Now we’re just changing the metric for which it is sold,” he says, adding that Sled Mobile believes in the model so much that it is willing to play the role of an arbitrager to further de-risk the new marketplace for both advertisers and publishers.

While publishers can utilize the model directly as part of a straight rev-share model, Guldimann says Sled Mobile will also seek to make a market by buying publisher inventory it knows will reach attentive consumers and resell it to brands based on the cost-per-second model, making its own money on the spread between the two sides.

“What we’re really after here is to drive adoption of the metric over the long run, and we realized we had to assume some of the risk in the short run to do that,” he explains.

He asserts it is not much of a risk, because of the data, insights and market intelligence Sled Mobile has derived from testing high-impact, user-controlled units in the marketplace. Over time, he says, creative executions will only get better as brands, publishers and even other third-party developers come up with better, even more engaging units.

Ultimately, Guldimann says Parsec will introduce a programmatic model leveraging a “quality score” so that the process can be automated and brands, agencies, trading desks and others can use the platform to buy audience time with reasonably predictive confidence.

3 comments about "Developer Introduces 'Cost-Per-Second' Ad Model, Calls It The 'CPC For Brands'".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, July 22, 2015 at 2:45 p.m.

    Sounds good to me. But, if I were an advertiser buying digital video ad "impressions" and I used a 15-second commercial I would pay virtually zero for every "impression" that lasted less than 15 seconds. So where does that leave us?

  2. John Grono from GAP Research, July 22, 2015 at 6:10 p.m.

    I understand the idea behind this model, but there is an inherent assumption that every second of each ad is of equal value.

    Take an ad like British Airways famous 1989 'Face' ad.   The actual branding only appears in the last few seconds of the 60-second ad.   Having said that, it was such a powerful ad, and BA was such an iconic airline back then, that I still can't hear Lachme and not think of BA and the ad.

  3. Steve Latham from Encore Media Metrics, July 23, 2015 at 8:37 a.m.

    Good idea if it can be independently measured. Who will confirm viewability and time spent viewing?

Next story loading loading..