Could ESPN offer an over-the-top (OTT) Internet option and have a strong business? One media analyst says this would result in fewer subscribers -- and a lot of tough competition from other cable networks.
Todd Juenger, senior media analyst at Bernstein Research, writes “the universe of younger adults, cord-nevers, with an interest in sports, who if given the opportunity, might be willing to fork over $20/month to see ‘SportsCenter,’ college sports, and the national games each week. That's the target market. We doubt it's very big.”
With all the attention focused on cord-cutters and crumbling pay TV providers having to pay high carriage fees, Walt Disney -- parent company of ESPN -- believes ESPN could have a good alternative to the current TV system by offering an OTT option.
advertisement
advertisement
The thinking now, Juenger says, is that some 100 million U.S. pay TV homes currently pay around $7 a month for ESPN -- but that around 33 million homes who are sports fans would pay $20 a month for an ESPN OTT service.
But Juenger believes any TV consumer would want more for their $20 a month. This is where the non-sports cable network competitors come in.
He says if ESPN launched OTT, then all the other cable network groups would jump in, and in a big way -- Discovery Communications, Viacom, AMC Networks, Scripps Networks Interactive, and Turner Broadcasting, to name a few.
“We believe the four companies listed above could team up and offer a mini-bundle, retailing at $15, with close to 50% gross margin... [which] would have scripted drama, comedy, non-fiction, lifestyle, news, kids, (and even some sports). Pretty much something for everyone in a non-sports household.”
Bob Iger, CEO for Walt Disney Co, says 83% of pay TV homes tune into ESPN over a broad time period. But Juenger says “many of those 83% of households are casually tuning into ESPN for short stints as they flip around the dial.”
He adds that spending an extra $20 a month on ESPN wouldn’t work because TV network consumers would figure out their overall TV network value.
“Plenty of non-sports households would probably keep the bundle [a traditional pay TV service] because it still offers by far the best value for the majority of U.S. households who continue to consume almost 8 hours of TV per day.”