Commentary

Speeches About Trump Dominate Golden Globes In La La Land

On Monday morning, the headlines on the Golden Globes stories were either about the night’s big winner -- the movie musical “La La Land” -- or the remarks by Meryl Streep and Hugh Laurie (and possibly others) whining about Donald Trump. Who else won awards? You have to dig deep into these stories to find that out.

A TV columnist (or any columnist) can be forgiven for combining the two prevailing storylines in a morning-after blog post that applies the “La La Land” movie title to a characterization of the divide between Hollywood and the rest of America -- approximately half of whose residents voted for Trump.

Possible headlines might be: “Message From La La Land: Half of the People Who Buy Tickets to Our Movies Are Idiots.” Or “Clueless Stars in La La Land Complain About Trump, Alienate Half of America.” Or “La La Land Luminaries Tell Nation: We’re Smarter Than 50% of You.”

advertisement

advertisement

It should go without saying that such behavior is bad for business. It doesn’t seem to occur to the residents of La La Land that they’re in a business that depends on Americans liking them.

Certainly, half the country can be relied upon to cheer when Meryl Streep makes a speech in which she warns that the Trump administration’s policies on immigration might mean the deportation of some of Hollywood’s top stars who are foreign-born. 

“If we kick ’em all out we’ll have nothing to watch but football and mixed-martial arts. Which are not the arts!” she proclaimed during Sunday night’s Golden Globes telecast on NBC.

Earth to Meryl: Many Americans enjoy football and mixed-martial arts. They also enjoy many movies and TV shows that come out of the industry you represent. Who died and made you America’s Arts Arbiter in Chief?

It’s just the kind of nonsense that the people who are still crying over Trump’s victory seem to love. They’re posting the text of Streep’s speech and the video of her delivering it all over social media today.

“This is what it’s like to view the world through Hollyweird glasses,” wrote New York Post movie critic Kyle Smith in a column published on Monday, “You actually worry that President Trump is going to deport Amy Adams [born in Italy] and Natalie Portman [born in Israel].”

Maybe Trump will try to deport the very people who put on the Golden Globe Awards every January -- the group known as the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. At the very least, maybe the Trump administration can succeed where numerous journalists have failed and identify who the 90-some members of this group actually are.

The political commentary emanating from Hollywood has grown tiresome. It also afflicted last year’s Oscars, in which a lack of African-American nominees became the “cause” of the day. Back then, the TV Blog applied the title of one of the Oscar-nominated movies, “Joy,” to a screed about the “joyless” Oscars.

Sunday night’s Golden Globes had that same world-weary tone, which to us ordinary folk watching at home doesn’t square with all the fabulousness on display in the Golden Globes banquet room and the red carpet outside.

It’s true that many people applaud when celebrities practice activism. When Meryl Streep makes a speech on social subjects outside of her profession, it’s seen as a way for this prominent personality to use her fame -- and presumably the respect she enjoys among many -- to do “good” on behalf of others.

At the same time, however, many people can’t stand it when celebrities get involved in this way -- particularly when they’re actors. Since these movie stars usually have no past history of scholarship or work experience in any of the areas they make speeches about, it’s reasonable to wonder whether they are simply playing the role of activist because they think it plays well to their constituency.

The Golden Globes serve as the unofficial kickoff for the Hollywood awards season that concludes with the Academy Awards (this year’s are on Feb. 26). The movie industry is really the only industry you can think of that gives itself so many awards that it requires a whole “season” to do it in.

Look for it to be a long, tired season of Trump-bashing too.

9 comments about "Speeches About Trump Dominate Golden Globes In La La Land".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Douglas Ferguson from College of Charleston, January 9, 2017 at 2:48 p.m.

    It's hard to ignore one's chance in the national bully pulpit. Hijacking a gratitude speech for politics is hardly new in Hollywood. I'm thinking of Sacheen Littlefeather at the 1973 Oscars. At least Streep accepted the award.

  2. charles bachrach from BCCLTD, January 9, 2017 at 3:46 p.m.

    Trump bashing should and will go on for at least four years.  He's is a classless moron (along with his family)  Meryl Streep, on the other hand, is an American treasure and I will stand with her
    on anything she says...ESPECIALLY about the useless TRUMP, his VP and Cabinet!!!!!!!!  The world hates Trump and this country will find that out soon enough!

  3. Chuck Lantz from 2007ac.com, 2017ac.com network replied, January 9, 2017 at 4:55 p.m.


    Please enlighten me by listing your allowable comments for an acceptance speech.

  4. Chuck Lantz from 2007ac.com, 2017ac.com network replied, January 9, 2017 at 5 p.m.


    I could not agree more. Last night, as soon as Streep finished her speech, my wife and I placed bets on how long it would take for Trump to tweet "ever-rated."

    The man does have some class, but it's all "third."

  5. Tony Jarvis from Olympic Media Consultancy, January 9, 2017 at 5:28 p.m.

    The usual biased twaddle from Mr. Buckman.  A report actually on the Golden Globes and the winners & losers and the stories behind them would have served readers far better.  Surely it is time that Media Post discontinued its relationship with Mr. Buckman who would serve Fox et al more appropriately.  The editorial staff at Media Post should note that most of us are not interested in, "a long, tired season of Trump" - pandering by Mr. Buckman. 
    BTW: Great piece by Joe Mandese on Honesty, The Press and The Golden Globes earlier today.
    http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/292491/more-from-some-very-dishonest-media-honestly.html

  6. Brigitte Clark from Access Media, January 9, 2017 at 5:39 p.m.

    Why am I not surprised by dear old Adam Buckman's stance on Meryl's speech! I definitely plan on looking at the World through "Hollyweird glasses" for the next 4 years or at the very least until Trumps impeachment. Our great divide continues.

  7. Gail Tregea from Freelance, January 9, 2017 at 8:19 p.m.

    People are getting bent out of shape because an entertainer is making a political speech.  See any irony here?

  8. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited, January 9, 2017 at 8:44 p.m.

    #1. Half the people in California did not vote for him. At best, about a million less than half the voters who voted voted for him which is less than 25% of the population. And wait until they find out they put in 3 quarters and declared winners when they get back 1 quarter. 

  9. John Motavalli from Freelance, January 11, 2017 at 8:07 a.m.

    Thumbs up, Adam

Next story loading loading..