“According to the third-quarter 2016 Nielsen Total Audience Report, mothers of all kinds show tremendous utilization of media and technology. But while working mothers have the most access to these devices and platforms, stay-at-home mothers have more of a penchant for them, says the report.
According to the report, device penetration is higher among mothers who work outside the home than it is among stay-at-home moms,” says the report. “Working mothers also tend to be more affluent and highly educated, and are therefore more likely to live in high-tech homes.”
Video game console
Enabled smart TV
Source: Nielsen, January 2017
“Compared with stay-at-home mothers, working moms are more likely to own technology across the multimedia board. This includes penetration levels of 98%, 80%, and 74% for smartphones, tablets and subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) respectively… moms in out-of-home working environments consider being able to view content when it’s most convenient for them a necessity,” says the report.
“… there are 25.1 million females in the U.S. who are between the ages of 18 and 49 and have one or more child under the age of 12, and almost three quarters of them are in the work force. Meanwhile, the percentage of working moms increases with age: About 71% of moms 18-34 are working, whereas 77% of moms 35-49 are working. (And,) despite having lower levels of device penetration, stay-at-home mothers actually utilize different technologies for longer time periods than their out of home counterparts.”
Live TV Viewing And Connected Device Usage (Weekly HH:Min; % of TV Population)
DVR/Time shifted TV
Source: Nielsen, January 2017
“Because they spend more time at home, these women are able to spend more time with both live TV and TV-connected devices,” says the report “… stay-at-home moms spend over seven-and-a-half additional hours watching live TV and content via TV-connected devices per week than those who work. This increase in usage was seen… most notably in live television usage (over five hours more), where the ability to remain at home diminishes the pertinence of time-shifted viewing capabilities.
That doesn’t mean that stay-at-home moms aren’t taking full advantage of these content conveniences. Weekly DVR/time-shifted TV viewing for these women accounts for their second-longest TV-related activity at just under four hours, and that’s still more than working moms.
With smartphone users, stay-at-home mothers spend a weekly average of over seven hours on social media and nearly 23 hours on the device overall… (and) nearly twice as much time with their PCs. All mothers ages 18-49 spend almost two hours on PCs, nearly seven hours on smartphones and over two hours on tablets per week using social media.
Working mothers outpace stay-at-home moms in hourly radio use… For working moms, the average quarter hour rating for radio skyrockets to a high of nearly 17% and an average of more than 14% during the morning and evening commute. Away from home, working moms have the greatest percentage of out-of-home listening at 77%.
Regardless of working status,” concludes the report, “mothers show increasing adoption and usage rates of both well established and newer forms of media. But depending on their choice of media, advertisers should find it beneficial to distinguish between the habits of mothers who make their living outside their home and those who make their living in it.”
For more from Nielsen, please visit here.
Jack, some other tid bits from the same report may also interest Media Post readers. According to Nielsen, the average person's in-home "live" TV consumption has barely changed in volume---just over four hours a day----over the last three years despite huge increases in digital usage---mainly smartphones and secondarily, tablets. Not surprising, since much smartphone usage takes place away from home.
Also, according to Nielsen, the number of homes able to receive cable fare---by wired, telco or satellite means---dropped by 1.8 million between the third Q of 2015 and 2016, leaving us with 98.2 million cable homes, compared to 100 million a year ago. At that attrition rate it willl take about 50 years for cable, as we know it, to disappear like the dinasaurs. Finally, according to Nielsen, on a typical day, only 34% of the population streams content but, interestingly, these people tend to use traditional TV to a slightly greater---not lesser---extent than the total population---about 231 minutes per day vs. 210. So streaming activity does not automatically equate with reductions in ""TV" usage. Streamers may simply be more into electronic media generally.
A correction on my post. The 210 minutes per day of TV viewing is for non-streamers, not the total population. Also, the streamers base time frame is not per day, I beleive.