Court Rebuffs FCC In Battle Over AT&T's Mobile Broadband Slowdowns

A high-stakes but messy fight between the Federal Trade Commission and AT&T over its mobile broadband practices may have just become even more complicated.

Late last week, the Federal Communications Commission said in new court papers that it disagreed with a key contention made by AT&T at a hearing. On Tuesday, the appellate court refused to consider the FCC's new filing.

The battle dates to late 2014, when the FTC sued AT&T for allegedly duping people by selling them plans with unlimited data, but throttling their mobile broadband connections after they exceeded a monthly cap of 3-5 GB.

AT&T has argued that the case should be thrown out on the theory that the FTC lacks jurisdiction over telecom companies. A trial judge disagreed with AT&T, but a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the telecom and dismissed the case.



The 9th Circuit then agreed to review the case "en banc" -- meaning that 11 of the circuit's judges will vote on the matter.

Numerous outside groups -- including consumer advocates, lawmakers and the FCC -- weighed in against AT&T on the dispute. Among other arguments, they said that AT&T's theory would create a regulatory gap, meaning a situation where no agency can prosecute companies that offer common carrier services -- even if those services are only one component of a larger business -- for matters like deceiving consumers or violating privacy policies.

Last month, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on the matter. At the hearing, Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski questioned AT&T's lawyer about whether a ruling in the company's favor would create a regulatory gap.

For instance, Kozinski asked, what would happen if Procter & Gamble purchased a common-carrier company specifically in order to avoid regulation by the FTC. "Do I say bye-bye FTC?" Kozinski asked.

AT&T's lawyer, Michael Kellogg, responded that the FCC could require Procter & Gamble to run its common carrier business as a separate subsidiary

On Friday, the FCC attempted to dispute AT&T's contention. The agency said in court papers that it could require not a company to separate a common-carrier service into a new subsidiary solely to ensure that the FTC can bring enforcement actions.

"AT&T’s argument that the FCC has the legal authority to require structural separation in order to facilitate FTC regulatory authority is baseless," the FCC wrote in a letter it unsuccessfully attempted to submit to the court.

"Even assuming it has the necessary authority, FCC imposition of structural separation requirements to allow the FTC to exercise jurisdiction over a carrier’s non-carrier activities would be unprecedented," the agency added. "The FCC has imposed separation requirements for one purpose only: to prevent abuses by carriers with market power."

It's not clear why the FCC waited four weeks to submit its letter, or why the 9th Circuit rejected the filing.

Next story loading loading..