Why First Price Auction's Time Has Come, Magna's Take
- by Joe Mandese @mp_joemandese, March 7, 2019
In light of Google Ad Manager's shift to a "unified first price auction" model for programmatic media-buying, we are republishing the findings of the Spring 2018 "Programmatic Report" from IPG Mediabrands' Magna unit, which does an excellent job of explaining the evolution of programmatic auctions, and why "first …
Reminder: You are seeing this premium content because you are a subscriber to MediaPost's Research Intelligencer and/or a member of the Center for Marketing & Media Research. This content cannot be viewed by non-subscribers/non-members.
3 comments about "Why First Price Auction's Time Has Come, Magna's Take".
Read more comments >
Next story loading 
Astounding to read a report stating that 60-70% of spend is on tech and only 30-40% on the actual media. Add in fraud and everything else and your really seem to be wasting a lot of money.
Interesting POV, Jack, that it's a waste of money. The marketplace only supports it if it works, and much of the programmatic marketplace is based on explicit ROI models, not indirect ones like GRPs and CPMs.
Also, traditional media allocate a lot to technology, data, proof-of-performance, etc., but we just don't normally look at it that way.
Not sure what makes programmatic digital that different in terms of a lot of money being wasted.
Both are used only if they work and both could improve their margins of efficiency.
Easy to tell if it works for online products. Not so much for anything else. When you target most likely customers you often see good ROI, but that’s not the same as maximizing profit. If ROI is that great, advertiser should be spending even more.