Haven't consumers shown that they don't want to pay for content? Hasn't the proliferation of shared information sites like Digg and user-generated
content in general proved that? It seems that there's far too much content out there to justify charging consumers--unless, of course, you're offering content of the same caliber as The Wall Street
Journal or The Financial Times (most of which is free anyway).
"If we had 5% of our audience paying $5 a month that would be $50,000," Baron muses, though he vacillates. Blogging, after all, is not journalism, nor is it held to the same standard as commentary from a respected news publication. So what about product placement? Baron worries that might "devalue the integrity of the audience." What, then, is a blogger to do?