Profanity Ruling Could Boost Net Neutrality
In the case decided this week, the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's finding that broadcasting "fleeting expletives" -- in this case, instances of swearing by celebrities on live TV -- was indecent.
Prior to 2004, the FCC took the opposite position -- that the use of fleeting expletives wasn't indecent.
Fox and other TV broadcasters argued that the FCC's sudden reversal wasn't fair. But the Supreme Court rejected that argument, in part because the FCC didn't impose fines or other penalties on the networks. (The Supreme Court didn't decide whether the FCC's stance violates the First Amendment. Instead the court told the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to consider that question.)
In Comcast's case, the FCC sanctioned the cable company for violating net neutrality principles by slowing peer-to-peer traffic, but didn't fine it. Instead, the FCC ordered Comcast to stop throttling peer-to-peer traffic (which Comcast had already done by the time the FCC ruled on the case) and to provide the agency with details about a new traffic-shaping plan.
Comcast is now arguing in court that the FCC had no authority to even make that order because it was based on a 2005 policy statement and not an official rule.
But some lawyers say that if it's OK for the FCC to do a turnaround on fleeting expletives, the agency also has the power decide that particular methods for shaping Web traffic are unlawful without first issuing formal regulations. Harold Feld, legal director of digital rights group Public Knowledge, for one, made that argument in a blog post about the issue. "It is hard to argue that the FCC can reverse policy consistent with due process, but cannot announce/clarify policy consistent with due process," he wrote.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


Be the first to comment on "Profanity Ruling Could Boost Net Neutrality "
Leave a Comment