City Drops Quest For Job Seekers' Passwords
"The extent of our request for a candidate's password, user name, or other internet information appears to have exceeded that which is acceptable to our community," city manager Chris A. Kukulski said in what's probably the understatement of the week.
Kukulski also said the city would "suspend" the practice of reviewing information already disclosed pending further review.
The turnaround came approximately 24 hours after news surfaced that the city was asking prospective employees for their user names and passwords to Facebook, YouTube, MySpace and other Web sites. It's not yet clear how many people had already provided such information or how the city used it.
Meanwhile, the debacle raises significant questions about how far employers -- public or private -- can and should go to investigate people's online activity.
While Bozeman appears to have been unique in asking prospective employees to supply names and passwords, some employers appear equally disrespectful of the privacy of people already on the payroll. Consider this: A branch of Houston's restaurant recently fired a waitress and bartender for complaining about management in a post to a MySpace group they created. The group was password-protected, but Houston's management allegedly persuaded another employee to disclose her password.
Consider also, The Associated Press recently reprimanded an employee based on a Facebook post criticizing McClatchy's management, according to Wired. (McClatchy is an AP member.)
In that case, the employee had apparently friended others at the AP and presumably knew that management might be monitoring his posts. Still, there's something distasteful -- not to mention repressive -- about monitoring people's every online statement.
At least the city of Bozeman seems to have realized that, even if other employers have not.
0 comments on "City Drops Quest For Job Seekers' Passwords ".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...


If something is illegal, then the person(s) who committed the illegal act is prosecuted and punished and has a criminal record. Plus, file sharing is illegal and the person who committed that crime could be fined into the tens of thousands or millions. So what punishment of these perpetrators aka employers, municipal or private should be fined? These are federal crimes. The elimination of the problem by the city does not erase what has been done and those who are still criminals should just have to face more serious federal consequences. ACLU, where are you?
Yeah!! This is good news. I replied to the other article.
Great Work.....