Berkman Center Stands By Broadband Proposals
In October, Harvard's Berkman Center said in a report to the Federal Communications Commission that broadband services are better in countries with open-access policies than in the U.S. Not surprisingly, telecoms and cable companies -- who currently have a duopoly over broadband services in much of the country -- take issue with the report.
The U.S. Telecom Association, for instance, challenged the center's analysis as well as its methodology. In a 19-page critique, the group said the Berkman Center incorrectly attributed other countries' success with broadband to open access policies "while ignoring more important factors, including facilities-based competition, direct government support, large private investment, and non-policy factors such as geography and demographics."
This week, the Berkman Center struck back with an new paper stating that it has examined 57 different studies and still disagrees with critics of open access principles. "The present unstated consensus in US telecommunications policy circles that open access is a theory in disrepute is without foundation in evidence," the paper concludes.
The Berkman Center isn't alone in suggesting line-sharing. Advocacy groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge also advocate such policies. "Imagine if a bunch of companies could get access to the cable company's wires at a wholesale rate and use it to offer consumers broadband internet. These companies would compete with each other, giving consumers real choice in broadband service," Public Knowledge said in its policy blog.
For now, however, the FCC doesn't appear ready to move in that direction. The agency's recent interim report, issued last week, disappointed some advocates because it didn't include recommendations to require networks to share lines with competing broadband providers.
0 comments on "Berkman Center Stands By Broadband Proposals ".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...
-
FTC Rejects Request To Delay New Children's Privacy Rules May 6, 7:43 p.m.
The Federal Trade Commission has unanimously turned down a request by industry groups to push back ...


... and thus the United States slips further toward global irrelevance for the sake of protecting a telecom cartel...
"Follow the money."