Kim Kardashian: Paid Tweeter
New York Post, Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:49 AM
"Kim Kardashian tweets with one hand and collects cash with the other," writes The New York Post. Not so shocking. What is shocking is that that the erstwhile Maxim covergirl and reality TV star gets upwards of $10 grand per tweet to keep her 2.7 million followers in the know. She is signed to "in-stream advertising" company Ad.ly.
One of her latest gems: "The Carl's Jr grilled chicken salads came out yesterday!! I'm on my way to Carl's Jr for lunch now . . . have you tried them yet?" All of which begs the philosophical question: If Kim Kardashian tweets about ordering a salad at Carl's Jr. in a forest does a 12-year-old girl get an eating disorder?
Read the whole story at New York Post »
One of her latest gems: "The Carl's Jr grilled chicken salads came out yesterday!! I'm on my way to Carl's Jr for lunch now . . . have you tried them yet?" All of which begs the philosophical question: If Kim Kardashian tweets about ordering a salad at Carl's Jr. in a forest does a 12-year-old girl get an eating disorder?
0 comments on "Kim Kardashian: Paid Tweeter ".
Leave a Comment
Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now
Recent Around the Net In Online Marketing Articles
-
Google Glass Apps Adding Up May 17, 11:47 a.m.
In what has become a necessary step for any successful operating system, Google Glass is starting ... -
Groupon Drags Out CEO Search May 17, 11:46 a.m.
Speaking of Groupon, the deal site says it’s unlikely to name a permanent new CEO until ... -
Andrew Mason Plotting Next Company May 17, 11:44 a.m.
What’s Andrew Mason been up to since being booted from the top spot at Groupon? Well, ... -
Yahoo Kicking Tumblr's Tires May 17, 11:44 a.m.
Yahoo is reportedly considering partnering with, investing in, or buying Tumblr. “Sources said the talks were ... -
Google, NASA To Study A.I. With "Quantum Computer" May 16, 12:01 p.m.
Google and NASA are creating a laboratory to study artificial intelligence. Their focus, as The New ... -
Skift Closes $1 Seed Round May 16, noon
Skift -- the travel intelligence and news startup founded by Rafat Ali -- has closed $1.1 ... -
USA Network Vies For Social Media Control May 16, 11:59 a.m.
USA Network on Thursday is expected to debut a new Web and mobile platform that, as ... -
Microsoft, Google At Odds Over App Ads May 16, 11:58 a.m.
After Microsoft updated its own YouTube application for Windows Phone the other week, Google sent the ... -
Larry Page Explains Soft-Spokenness May 15, 10:30 a.m.
More than personal quirk or mere curiosity, Larry Page’s soft-spokenness has led some analysts to question ... -
Brightcove Bows Mobile Live-Streaming Tool May 15, 10:29 a.m.
Video distribution platform Brightcove is introducing a new module that is designed to help customers run ...


Professionally, I see nothing wrong with this, if the paid shill Kims of the world remain this transparent. Whether the targeted audience is listening and activating around the messages will determine whether this remains a viable media channel. Or, at least, how much they charge for these life-stream promotions.
The peeps I DO have an issue with are the Chris Brogan's and Magpies of the world who are much less transparent about their pay per tweet monetization machines.
As long as disclosure is available to the general public I do not see a problem. Ms. Kardashian is after all a celebrity (by way of released sex tape). Marketing online is marketing online.
FTC Publishes Final Guides Governing Endorsements, Testimonials. Changes Affect Testimonial Advertisements, Bloggers, Celebrity Endorsements
Visit http://www.clickz.com/3635221 for basic overview or from the horses mouth http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm
Kim went on twitter and said that she in fact was NOT paid for this. Just wanted to give you a heads up. www.haveuheard.net
I came across an article about what various sites charged per thousand, and the numbers were quite impressive for some sites. The article said that Kim Kardashian charged $10,000 per tweet. I posted this on Twitter. I think it is ridiculous, because why would anyone want to do that?