Facebook Asks Court To Dismiss Click Fraud Cases
"Contrary to plaintiffs' allegations, the contract does not require Facebook to police its website for all instances of click fraud nor does it limit Facebook's ability to collect fees generated by clicks on plaintiffs' advertisements," Facebook alleges in a recent motion to dismiss the cases.
The litigation grows out of complaints filed by sports site RootZoo and several other online marketers. They filed suit shortly after TechCrunch reported on an influx of complaints by marketers about perceived click fraud on Facebook. The cases were consolidated into one litigation, currently pending in front of U.S. District court Judge Jeremy Fogel in the northern district of California.
Facebook alleges in its motion papers that all cost-per-click advertisers were required to check a box stating that they agreed to the company's terms and conditions, which allegedly included the following language: "I understand that third parties may generate impressions, clicks, or other actions affecting the cost of the advertising for fraudulent or improper purposes, and I accept the risk of any such impressions, clicks, or other actions."
Late last week, the marketers filed a response denying that the disclaimer was part of their contracts. They also said that the disclaimer is "ambiguous" and "strikingly inconsistent" with Facebook's advertising policies and statements. For instance, they argue, Facebook posts a glossary that says: "We have a variety of measures in place to ensure that we only report and charge advertisers for legitimate clicks, and not clicks that come from automated programs, or clicks that may be repetitive, abusive, or otherwise inauthentic."
While Facebook clearly has a motive to draft terms and conditions that aim to avoid liability, the strategy also seems likely to pose a public relations problem, says online marketing consultant Greg Sterling. "They're in a difficult spot," he says. "They have to say, 'We will fight click fraud,' but they don't want to make themselves vulnerable to damage claims -- which could be quite substantial."
Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman says that Facebook's agreement with marketers appears to be clear, but adds that courts "often will consider additional documentation outside the 'four corners' of the contract." Facebook declined to comment for this article.
0 comments on "Facebook Asks Court To Dismiss Click Fraud Cases ".
Leave a Comment
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
Network Advertising Initiative Proposes New Mobile Privacy Rules May 22, 9:03 p.m.
Moving forward with its plan to issue mobile privacy rules, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative ... -
Entertainment, Travel Bet On Mobile Banners May 22, 4:16 p.m.
Banner ads have long been the whipping boy of online advertising, and the same is now ... -
Marketers Should Tailor Specific Pitches To Tablet, Smartphone May 22, 2:51 p.m.
Don’t lump tablets in with mobile. That’s the takeaway of a new Forrester study looking at ... -
Good TV Content Trumps On, Whether Trad TV Or Streaming May 22, 2:42 p.m.
While consumers continue to perceive TV programming as superior in quality to that of online fare, ... -
Google Releases Self-Serve Display Benchmark Tool May 22, 2:02 p.m.
Understanding how a brand's online campaign competes with competitors requires trending benchmark data like engagement rates ... -
Twitter Brings Lead Generation To Tweets May 22, 1:14 p.m.
Twitter began testing a lead generation tool Wednesday in its tweet stream that resembles a cross ... -
DigitasLBi, Razorfish Tap Execs For Global Ops May 22, 11:26 a.m.
Publicis Groupe digital agencies DigitasLBi and Razorfish have installed new executives to run their respective international ... -
More Consumers Turn To Mobile To Research, Book Travel May 22, 8:53 a.m.
More than half of consumers used a mobile device to book travel in the last 90 ... -
Showrooming Overhyped, Mobile Key To Shopping Purchases May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Given consumers' mobile in-store shopping trends, some consider the showrooming hoopla overblown. The research process still ... -
Shopping App Swirl Adds In-Store Capability May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Swirl entered the mobile shopping fray last year with an iPhone app allowing users to learn ...
This sounds like utter stupidity to me. So Facebook's defence is to say that they want to be paid for their media but have no intention of guaranteeing its integrity. Oh yes let me transfer my media budgets to Facebook immediately.. not!
If Facebook wins, surely no self respecting media buyer will ever consider buying space on Facebook again. They don’t seem to have thought this through at all.