Tiger Woods Won't Take Questions -- But We'll Be Watching Anyway
No problem. I only have two small ones: Have you played any golf lately -- and when do you think you'll play again, giving TV golf marketers all those big rating points?
One could muse that perhaps golf-only questions would be okay. But his handlers know that a voracious press corps would try to slip in a few ones about his personal life.
But do we really need a press conference? Thanks to the fast-moving digital age, additional information may not be necessary. Woods voyeurs want something else: in-the-flesh responses, complete with facial expressions.
Here's an inquiry that Woods can't answer: What kind of ratings will your press conference get? No one has heard from Woods in some time. Will it be a case of "absence makes the heart grow fonder," or something of a train wreck?
ESPN did a feature on Wednesday about the return of Tiger Woods to the golf course possibly including some unusual audio extras -- heckling. This isn't what the mostly demure and polite golf fans are typically into. But the attention will surely be there - and that means ratings.
Point of reference: The 2009 Masters event posted an average 9.54 million viewers with Woods competing; the 2008 Masters was at 9.71 million with Woods.
We all know what a singular identifiable champion athlete like Tiger Woods, without controversy, has meant to a specific sport. It's what Lance Armstrong has meant to cycling races: significantly increased viewership.
Athletes are trained to control stuff: their training, schedules, diets, and, of course, their brand names. Why would we expect any less when it comes to their press conferences?
There's no question fans want more dramatic answers. There's also a need for more dramatic golfing from perhaps the best player in the world.
0 comments on "Tiger Woods Won't Take Questions -- But We'll Be Watching Anyway".
Leave a Comment
WAYNE FRIEDMAN
Wayne Friedman is West Coast Editor of MediaPost.
Recent TV Watch Articles
-
TV Stations' Future Digital Goals: Not Living By Algorithms Alone May 24, 4:20 p.m.
Some TV station executives may not like the ROI specifics around the digital business model that ...
-
Media Execs Re. $1 Bil NewFront Estimates: What Are They Smoking? May 23, 12:51 p.m.
Wild upfront digital video estimates postured that many platforms/sites could get $1 billion in upfront money ...
-
TV Distributors Looking For More Programming Control, Possibly With Some Big-Media Approval May 21, 9:56 p.m.
DirecTV and Time Warner Cable are two traditional TV programming distributors kicking the tires at Hulu. ...
-
When News Twists In The Wind, TV Show Up Faster & With More Detail May 21, 12:24 a.m.
Seemingly minutes after a massive tornado hit, an MSNBC news image showed a speedboat sitting on ...
-
Big TV Broadcast Development for 2013-2014: But Where Is The New Reality? May 17, 9:37 a.m.
Good news for those who still believe in broadcast network television: There some 52 new shows ...
-
2013 TV Upfront Conclusion: Harder For Viewers To Avoid Commercials May 16, 7:40 a.m.
TV commercial overload: It's not over yet.While the TV industry works out its online and digital ...
-
Where Do TV Broadcast Networks Fit In A La Carte Programming? May 15, 9:58 a.m.
It may be no coincidence that Sen. John McCain's bill to revamp most of the modern ...
-
Will You Fail TV's test... Or Will TV Fail You? May 14, 9:56 a.m.
Take a TV test. TV networks still believe your positive results are crucial for their fall ...
-
Upfront Nerves: Digital Executives On Edge. TV Executives? Calm Before The Storm May 13, 1:57 p.m.
Pre-upfront time media executive nerves are on edge.Senior media agency executives are telling major digital video ...
-
Can Cable Or Digital Content Networks Provide Relief For TV's 'Failure Tax'? May 10, 4:41 p.m.
Failure tax? Is that what marketers continue to pay to TV broadcasters? Yes, according to Mel ...
Completely gutless, he is. You know the questions he'd have gotten would fall over backwards being respectful, yet he hides behind his PR firm.
Per your point about athletes controlling stuff... that is exactly the problem. He controls the wrong stuff. If he really had control this situation would not exist to begin with.
Frankly, I'd love to hear him say something to the effect that he'd obviously been stupid in his personal life and that became fodder for the media mill. However, his personal life remains just that: personal. He should not be mistaken for anybody's priest, minister, rabbi, emam, monk or personal ethician, he is a golfer. From this point on, questions about golf will be answered and questions about his personal life will be ignored.
Tiger Woods is a professional golfer. Period end. The only explanation for his behavior owed is to his wife and family. Oh, and to the companies to whom he serves as a product spokesman/endorser. That's all.
If you're not married to him or not paying him to endorse your product, you really don't have a dog in this hunt. It's all salacious at this point.
Like my sainted mother used to say, Just because someone asks you a question, don't mean you owe them an answer.
Tiger Woods broke some of his contracts. He flouted high moral standards. Let's not forget those floosies (nice word for whores who got paid off in cash or cause celebrete) who knew and know he would not leave his wife and children for THEM. This is not a new male-female activity. All said, he didn't brake any public laws not counting his car crashing into a tree. When an advertiser or sport, etc., puts all of its marbles into one big bag, what does it say about that particular advertiser/sport? they've got nothing else? Risky business from the get go.