Google's Privacy 'Fix' Evades Real Issues
When asked about privacy by editors of The Wall Street Journal, Schmidt predicted that in the future teens will have the option of changing their names when they become adults in order to distance themselves from material posted by their friends. The Journal says this prediction was "apparently serious."
But it's hard to believe that Schmidt really was presenting this idea as a solution to very real privacy problems posed by digital media. Schmidt must know as well as anyone that pseudonyms can be easy to crack, as happened when AOL released search queries for "anonymized" users. Besides, there's nothing to stop the same people who made the initial, presumably embarrassing posts from updating them with their friends' new names.
It seems more likely that Schmidt's comments (at least as reported by the Journal) were aimed at deflecting questions about how Google itself compromises privacy by instead turning the focus to the ways in which users can be compromised by their friends.
That problem, of course, is beyond Google's control. After all, users have always been able to embarrass their friends, whether by circulating private emails, writing blog entries or otherwise making facts public.
It's also totally separate from the privacy problems that occur when companies leak information that users thought was confidential, as happened when Google launched Buzz -- which initially revealed names of users' email contacts, if users activated Buzz without changing the defaults -- or when AOL publicly released 650,000 users' search queries.
Google itself has never adequately addressed why it stores users' search queries as long as it does. The company also has never adequately answered concerns about how it will keep information about the books people read confidential, should the settlement in the book search case go through.
Schmidt should spend a little more time thinking about Google can address privacy issues, not about how users can protect themselves from their friends.
0 comments on "Google's Privacy 'Fix' Evades Real Issues".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...


Marriage is how female teens have always been able to separate from their wild youth.