Fox's Web Site Block Turns Internet Policy Debate In New Direction
While Fox's actions probably didn't violate neutrality principles as currently defined by the Federal Communications Commission, the network's decision nonetheless could prove instrumental in shaping new rules. The current FCC proposal on neutrality would require Internet service providers to access all lawful content. If enacted, that proposal would make it unlawful for ISPs like Cablevision to prevent subscribers from reaching Fox sites, but not vice versa.
But that's only the current version of the neutrality proposal. Fox's steps this weekend could easily result in new blueprints for regulations. After all, the current neutrality debates were kicked off when former AT&T CEO Ed Whitacre complained that Google was getting a "free ride" on the telecom's pipes. At the time, some industry observers could imagine that ISPs would degrade traffic to sites like Google, but not too many people seemed to envision that publishers would block users because of disputes with their ISPs.
But now that Fox appears to have discriminated against users of a particular ISP, policymakers could well decide that they have to protect Web users from discrimination based on the identity of their ISP. Already, some lawmakers already are expressing concern over the events of the weekend. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) sent a letter to the FCC arguing that Fox's actions are contrary to the agency's Internet policy statement of 2005. That statement says that consumers are entitled to access the lawful Web content of their choice. (As it turns out, that statement is unenforceable because the Internet is classified as an information service and not a telecommunications service, but that, too, could change.) Markey went on to urge the FCC "to actively defend Internet freedom and consumer rights."
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...
-
FTC Rejects Request To Delay New Children's Privacy Rules May 6, 7:43 p.m.
The Federal Trade Commission has unanimously turned down a request by industry groups to push back ...
Be the first to comment on "Fox's Web Site Block Turns Internet Policy Debate In New Direction "
Leave a Comment