When 'Two Behind' In TV Sports Means 'Behind On Commercials'
Are sports on TV becoming more like a TV reality show? That's what at least one coach is suggesting.
TV critics complain that massive editing help give reality TV the "drama" it needs to draw in viewers. But business gets in the way as well. Cast members may need to talk up a makeup brand on "America's Next Top Model" or a new Burger King meal needing marketing help on "The Apprentice."
"Cast members" on sporting events might have to do their part as well when not enough of those 20 some-odd commercial breaks get into a telecast. Could ESPN have been asking the coaches during the Tennessee Titans 23-3 win over the Jacksonville Jaguars on "Monday Night Football" to slow things up, call some late-game time-outs so the network could work in more commercials?
Titans coach Jeff Fisher seemed to suggest this was going on. He said in a TV interview that "it's the first time" he'd heard of coaches being asked to call timeouts.
ESPN and Disney executives said that was not the case. Fisher clarified in a radio interview, "What happens at [the] two-minute warning, the NFL gives you the status of TV, and with commercials they said 'we're two behind.'" He added: "ESPN never came to me and said to call a timeout." Okay, we get that. But why is ESPN even telling Fisher that "we're two behind"? What does that have to do with Fisher's running of his football game? Further explanation is needed.
Television is all about managing content, and sports leagues want to put on the most dramatic stuff available. Big rivalries, major media markets going head to head, and Brett Favre returning to play his old teams, Green Bay Packers, or the New York Jets, for example -- make for good stories.
But the league also needs to conduct advertising business. Do coaches need to be cognizant of his? If anything, the alleged ESPN action seems to breach those communications lines between business and content, in this case unscripted sports content.
A fumble, for sure, in the eyes of football fans. The league says it's looking into it.
0 comments on "When 'Two Behind' In TV Sports Means 'Behind On Commercials' ".
Leave a Comment
Recent TV Watch Articles
-
TV Stations' Future Digital Goals: Not Living By Algorithms Alone May 24, 4:20 p.m.
Some TV station executives may not like the ROI specifics around the digital business model that ...
-
Media Execs Re. $1 Bil NewFront Estimates: What Are They Smoking? May 23, 12:51 p.m.
Wild upfront digital video estimates postured that many platforms/sites could get $1 billion in upfront money ...
-
TV Distributors Looking For More Programming Control, Possibly With Some Big-Media Approval May 21, 9:56 p.m.
DirecTV and Time Warner Cable are two traditional TV programming distributors kicking the tires at Hulu. ...
-
When News Twists In The Wind, TV Show Up Faster & With More Detail May 21, 12:24 a.m.
Seemingly minutes after a massive tornado hit, an MSNBC news image showed a speedboat sitting on ...
-
Big TV Broadcast Development for 2013-2014: But Where Is The New Reality? May 17, 9:37 a.m.
Good news for those who still believe in broadcast network television: There some 52 new shows ...
-
2013 TV Upfront Conclusion: Harder For Viewers To Avoid Commercials May 16, 7:40 a.m.
TV commercial overload: It's not over yet.While the TV industry works out its online and digital ...
-
Where Do TV Broadcast Networks Fit In A La Carte Programming? May 15, 9:58 a.m.
It may be no coincidence that Sen. John McCain's bill to revamp most of the modern ...
-
Will You Fail TV's test... Or Will TV Fail You? May 14, 9:56 a.m.
Take a TV test. TV networks still believe your positive results are crucial for their fall ...
-
Upfront Nerves: Digital Executives On Edge. TV Executives? Calm Before The Storm May 13, 1:57 p.m.
Pre-upfront time media executive nerves are on edge.Senior media agency executives are telling major digital video ...
-
Can Cable Or Digital Content Networks Provide Relief For TV's 'Failure Tax'? May 10, 4:41 p.m.
Failure tax? Is that what marketers continue to pay to TV broadcasters? Yes, according to Mel ...

Wayne Friedman is West Coast Editor of MediaPost.
"Looking into it," I'm sure.
Unfortunate, but not surprising. Ever go to a televised football game for a mid-major? It's right in-between can't-miss and I'll-read-about-it-later sports entertainment... and is usually stocked with the most remarkably hidden TV timeouts available.
And there's no such thing as sports betting or fixed odd either;)
TV has become so powerful, the medium has gone to the heads of those controlling it. Rather than having two teams play a game, and TV coming to "cover" it, TV producers/etc try to "control" the game to fit into their broadcast template.
I've been at plenty of live sports events which were broadcast live on TV and watched as TV controls the game. I don't like it as a spectator or as a viewer. TV needs to let the event take place as if they weren't there, and just broadcast what happens. Shame on advertisers that support (or make happen) TV getting involved.