"I think there's been a movement afoot to have people think that there's a tobacco advertising exception to the First Amendment," says David L.
Hudson, a scholar at the First Amendment Center. "There isn't, and there shouldn't be. It's not illegal to smoke in this country."
The FDA is taking
public comment on the 36 proposed images through Jan. 9 and then will pick nine of them to go on boxes by Oct. 22, 2012. R.J. Reynolds and Lorillard have already filed suit, saying the warning labels
will obscure the companies' brand names. Philip Morris says it intends to participate in the public-comment process.
advertisement
advertisement
Meanwhile, Forbes' Daniel Fisher blogs that a suit to break up the $200 billion tobacco settlement is "an excellent summation of the argument against an agreement that enriched Philip Morris, plaintiff lawyers and the National Association of Attorneys General at the expense of consumers and competing cigarette companies." But he doesn't think it stands much of a chance of making headway in the U.S. Supreme Court.